VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Thursday, May 23, 23:11:48 [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 22/07/03 19:08
Author: Peter
Subject: Re: 小動物和大城市
In reply to: patsy 's message, "Re: 小動物和大城市" on 22/07/03 15:22

首先,我從沒"咒罵"過你,請不要偷換概念.我一早就說可將牠們轉送他人或機構.一定要以大量死亡作威嚇?
既然香港沒有多少土地可稱大自然,即是本地己不適合養寵物,為何還要養?令無辜生命被繁殖?要求將寵物養到老死,如再令香港出疫潮,是人的生命重要,還是動物?廣東不是有瘋狗症了嗎?
公屋居民遣反合約是不對的,為何還以受害者姿態出現?
世界各地可有同樣條例？全世界有香港如此狹窄公屋,且要求養喜愛跑來跑去,跳上跳下的動物嗎?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT+8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.