VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123[4] ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 08:31:52 11/06/03 Thu
Author: http://www.info.gov.hk/justice/new/chi/legal/right.htm
Subject: 沒錯,那麼為何舉證責任一定要在控方呢?(內文)
In reply to: 你見過差佬拎住搜查令,爆門捉誹謗的被告? 's message, "當然係民事" on 08:02:25 11/06/03 Thu

刑事=舉證責任在控方

民事=民事案的舉證責任較刑事案易於履行,舉證準則是基於可能性的權衡。

其中誹謗的舉證責任在被告,被告要證明說的話符合事實或屬於誠實的評論
唔信可以回去問楊金權,甚至你的律師

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:



Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.