VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123[4] ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 16:54:02 11/06/03 Thu
Author: No name
Subject: 幾個幾得意口既Point
In reply to: http://www.info.gov.hk/justice/new/chi/legal/right.htm 's message, "沒錯,那麼為何舉證責任一定要在控方呢?(內文)" on 08:31:52 11/06/03 Thu

問:控告別人以短暫形式誹謗時,要提出甚麼額外證據?

答:除了上述要求外,在大多數短暫形式誹謗訴訟中,被誹謗者還必須證明蒙受了"特殊損害",即是可以用金錢衡量的損失。失去朋友一般並非特殊損害,但失去朋友答應作東的晚宴卻是特殊損害,原因是晚宴的價值可以用金錢衡量而失去朋友並不能用金錢衡量。

問:如果該誹謗性言論所言屬實,怎麼辦?

答:那麼,發表該言論的人便未必需要負上誹謗之責。在民事誹謗訴訟中,言論屬實是充分的免責辯護。

舉例說,A先生為人不誠實,但因為善於掩飾,人人都以為他是個老實人。如果你以口頭或書面發表言論,指稱A先生其實為人狡詐,那麼,雖然你的言論會貶損A的聲譽,但他亦不可因此而控告你,因為你只是實話實說,把他的聲譽降低至"正確水平"。

不過,你在這樣說他之前,最好先肯定有證有據,而如果他控告你,你可向法庭提出證據支持,但你在法庭上可能會被要求傳召大量證人,證明A先生其實為人狡詐,這麼,你在法庭提出證據既困難,耗費又高。還有,A先生也可以傳召他的證人證明他是老實人。最後不論你勝訴還是敗訴,冗長的審訊過程都會引起甚昂貴的費用。

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.