VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345678910 ]
Subject: Judge OK's $2.8B settlement, paving way for colleges to pay athletes


Author:
Tim
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 08:40:13 06/07/25 Sat

I'm not sure the term "college" sports has any meaning now.

Schools are now free to begin paying their athletes directly, marking the dawn of a new era in college sports brought about by a multibillion-dollar legal settlement that was formally approved Friday.

Judge Claudia Wilken approved the deal between the NCAA, its most powerful conferences and lawyers representing all Division I athletes. The House v. NCAA settlement ends three separate federal antitrust lawsuits, all of which claimed the NCAA was illegally limiting the earning power of college athletes.

Wilken's long-awaited decision comes with less than a month remaining before schools are planning to start cutting checks to athletes on July 1. Both sides presented their arguments for approving the settlement at a hearing in early April. While college sports leaders have been making tentative plans for a major shift in how they do business, the tight turnaround time means schools and conferences will have to hustle to establish the infrastructure needed to enforce their new rules.

The NCAA will pay nearly $2.8 billion in back damages over the next 10 years to athletes who competed in college at any time from 2016 through present day. Moving forward, each school can pay its athletes up to a certain limit. The annual cap is expected to start at roughly $20.5 million per school in 2025-26 and increase every year during the decade-long deal. These new payments are in addition to scholarships and other benefits the athletes already receive.

Friday's order is a major milestone in the long push to remove outdated amateurism rules from major college sports. Since 2021, college athletes have been allowed to make money from third parties via name, image and likeness deals. Boosters quickly organized groups called collectives that used NIL money as de facto salaries for their teams, in some cases paying millions of dollars mostly to top-rated basketball and football players. Now, that money will come straight from the athletic departments.

"It's historic," former college basketball star Sedona Prince, one of the co-lead plaintiffs in one of the lawsuits, told ESPN. "It seemed like this crazy, outlandish idea at the time of what college athletics could and should be like. It was a difficult process at times ... but it's going to change millions of lives for the better."

In June 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court unanimously ruled against the NCAA in a case that made it clear that college athletics should be treated less like an education-based endeavor and more like a lucrative entertainment industry. The decision unleashed a flood of fresh legal challenges to NCAA rules that have led to unprecedented turmoil.

The settlement approved this week will not put an end to the barrage of legal challenges. Questions about whether athletes should be considered employees and the current rules that dictate how long an athlete can play college sports remain unanswered.

However, NCAA president Charlie Baker and others believe the deal will help schools regain control and tamp down the skyrocketing, largely unregulated market for paying college players through third parties.

https://www.espn.com/college-sports/story/_/id/45467505/judge-grants-final-approval-house-v-ncaa-settlement

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
[> Subject: Re: Judge OK's $2.8B settlement, paving way for colleges to pay athletes


Author:
sparman
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 13:14:33 06/07/25 Sat

Here's a quick summary: https://bleacherreport.com/articles/25181018-winners-and-losers-house-v-ncaa-nil-settlement-college-sports

Don't know how accurate the description is, including categorization of winners and losers.

Seems to me if there are hard caps on roster sizes and school payments, this might work in ivies' favor. I suppose it depends partly on how large the "fair market value" allowance for outside NIL is stretched. But the cynic says it may not be long until this exception swallows up the intended settlement limits.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> Subject: Big Ten Press Releases; What Will Happen to the Best Universities in The World?


Author:
An Observer
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 20:33:04 06/10/25 Tue

I just channel surfed by the Big Ten Network. On the news crawler at the bottom of the screen is a succession of press release statements from the 10/11/14/18 members of the Big Ten conference, all to the effect of, "We will not skimp. We will pay out the maximum dollars allowed to our 'student-athletes.' Recruits should know that Indiana/ Nebraska/ Oregon/ Purdue/ Rutgers is in it to win it."

First of all, would you please finally stop the increasingly fraudulent use of the term "student-athlete"? You can resume the next time that a starter asks his or her coach to be excused from practice for a chemistry lab or a make-up exam -- and is then excused.

No coach is going to countenance the normal inconveniences of academia when the student is making more than any of the assistant coaches and, in a few cases, more than the head coach.

Secondly, nobody doubts that the maximum allowable budget will be spent. Indeed, we expect that the budget will be exhausted and then more funds will be transferred, above the table, below the table, in plain white envelopes, in brown paper bags, in Samsonsite brief cases and wired to Swiss bank accounts. The money will keep going up until we find the limits of what boosters want to pay and what players demand to be paid. I ain't betting on a low ceiling.

Lastly, and I've said this a million times here, this is terrible for America. Check back in ten and twenty years to see the state of (1) higher education; (2) secondary education; and (3) middle school education. I predict that all three will be worse, especially (2).

Say what you will about American higher education with all of its faults and warts, with its crazy left wing faculties and its whack-a-doodle athletic boosters, who undoubtedly skew right wing, right now American universities are still the best in the world. That is a tremendous asset for our economy, our culture and our society. American universities help America.

But it doesn't have to be that American universities are ranked #1, any more than it has to be that Princeton or Harvard is ranked #1. From the early nineteenth century through the 1930's, far and away the best universities in the world were German and Oxford/Cambridge. Things changed, including wars and an explosion of scientific research in the US. Thus did American universities begin their ascendancy.

People forget that, for at least half of their existence, Harvard Yale and Princeton were not the leading universities in the world. Stanford just ascended to the top in the last five minutes.

Today, nobody considers the best universities in the world to be German or Oxford/Cambridge.

There's no reason to think that we are entitled to be preeminent forever. In twenty years, NIL deals and the transfer portal will be seen to be one of the worst things that's ever happened to American higher education. It's a shame.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: Big Ten Press Releases; What Will Happen to the Best Universities in The World?


Author:
observer
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 08:49:47 06/12/25 Thu

Given that many Ivy students were given permission to protest instead of taking exams, one should be leery of throwing stones from glass houses.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]


Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
* HTML allowed in marked fields.
* Message subject (required):

Name (required):

  Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:


Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.