VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]3 ]
Subject: Re: Well Regulated Militia


Author:
DHard3006
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 11:24:38 12/28/02 Sat
In reply to: Dan Johnson 's message, "Well Regulated Militia" on 16:27:59 12/27/02 Fri

I am somewhat puzzled by people that constantly mention the militia part of the 2nd amend. No where in the 2nd amend does it state a requirement to be in a militia to have a gun. It simply states a well regulated militia, and the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.

The gun haters want to use the well regulated militia part to imply people must be in a militia to have arms. When you ask the gun haters where does the 2nd amend or any document state a person must be in a militia to have arms the gun haters cannot answer it.

The 2nd amend is a very simple right. The people that want to ban the right to have guns want to make it appear to be a very complicated right. There is only twenty-seven words in the 2nd amend. None of these words are in the 2nd amend, requirement, ban, assault weapon, sniper gun, military style weapons, or high powered rifles. The 2nd amend simply states the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed! Sure it also mention a well regulated militia. But it does not state you must be in a militia to bear arms!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]



Forum timezone: GMT-3
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.