Re: What is his thesis? -- The MB of Ian Alex Blease

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Tue, May 19 2026, 1:31:47 [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 14:35:23 07/01/09 Wed
Author: Barry
Author Host/IP: c-24-13-235-113.hsd1.il.comcast.net / 24.13.235.113
Subject: Re: What is his thesis?
In reply to: warwick 's message, "Re: What is his thesis?" on 11:29:27 07/01/09 Wed

Warwick,

I respectfully disagree. The debates engaged by Clive,Don and others with the those of the ortho persuasion are absolutey black and white.

If PI, PHI is found in the Pyramids, the orthodox dimsiss it as coincidence or there must be some reference in some text that says these concepts were important to the AE because we can find PI and PHI on urinals today (I don't beleive that I am in anyway exagerating the derivise way such arguments are dismissed).

The classic example that I recall was the alignment of the GP to true north. Experts (inter alia, Owen Gingerich) said that such a precise alignment could only be done using astronomical means and that humans only accquired such knowledge in the 17th century (Brahe).

Yet, the orthodox pretended that Gingerich's statement never existed and said how such an alignment could be achieved by solar means. Others said that there was no evidence that the AE intended such a precise alignment (implyng it was due to chance as, apparently, some urinals are perfectly aligned to North!). Still others pointed out that the other pyramidds did not have such a perfect alignment.

A common sense conclusion would that the AE knew more about the stars than the orthodox give them and that if they wanted, the could align any pyramid to true north. Hence, the deviation from north was intentional and has some significance.

No -- we can't have that. That AE did not know anything about the stars. It was th Greeks who were self taught in everything. There can be no pan generational plans as that would be culturally prohibited!

Warwick, it is black and white. The Pyramids are nothing more than gigantic funerary structures. It so written.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

that poor strawman has had enough -- warwick, 09:34:59 07/03/09 Fri
- Re: that poor strawman has had enough -- Barry, 02:46:49 07/13/09 Mon
  - Re: that poor strawman has had enough -- Warwick, 09:33:15 07/16/09 Thu
    - Re: that poor strawman has had enough -- Barry, 10:39:07 07/18/09 Sat