VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Sat, May 16 2026, 13:43:29 [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, [9], 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 08:32:09 04/16/08 Wed
Author: Katherine
Author Host/IP: dpc6682009104.direcpc.com / 66.82.9.104
Subject: Re: A Tomb For Akhenaten ?
In reply to: Ian 's message, "Re: A Tomb For Akhenaten ?" on 05:05:08 04/16/08 Wed

It also occurs to me, why did the buliders not begin extend WV 25 for Tutankhamun if it as we think, it was abandoned by Amunhotep IV.

The only reason I can think of is that they didn't want any association whatsoever with Akhenaten. After all nobody used it at all until the 21st or 22nd dynasty (can't remember which now) when some intrusive burials were placed in it.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.