VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Thursday, June 04, 8:59:44Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]345678 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 08:15:59 01/17/08 Thu
Author: kgp
Subject: I'd have no problem with Bobby not mentioning Tom as a minor inconsistency if it means we get Tom back. Cook would be more important to Bobby than a valet.
In reply to: devenhuis 's message, "yes, but unfortunately, Bobby says nothing about a valet when describing the situation to Roger after resigning from LJG's service (something about his Lordship & the cook only). wouldn't he, if Tom were there? Admittedly, it would be more fun if Tom was there." on 07:23:37 01/17/08 Thu


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:





[ Contact Forum Admin ]




Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.