Yes, Jamie had taken care of that problem in France prior to returning to Scotland. John didn't say he'd been raped with an object (I assume he could tell the difference even at 16), so it couldn't have been Jack. -- LJG Discussion board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Monday, April 20, 0:17:02 [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 15:55:44 12/06/07 Thu
Author: Jane
Subject: Yes, Jamie had taken care of that problem in France prior to returning to Scotland. John didn't say he'd been raped with an object (I assume he could tell the difference even at 16), so it couldn't have been Jack.
In reply to: Karen 's message, "Interesting point! I did notice the reference but I completely forgot where BJR would have been at the time. Still, was this after Jamie's duel with BJR, or before? If it was after, then I can't see how he would have been in condition to rape anybody." on 15:42:57 12/06/07 Thu

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Still, the fact that John might have known him is thrilling enough eh? (NT) -- Oleander, 07:59:49 12/07/07 Fri
- I can't think that John (who was was very young at the time) would have been impressed by Jack or would go out of his way to associate with him at all. I would think that Jack's reputation as a harsh commanding officer (after all his men were afraid of him) would be off putting enough, even if John had no inkling of the sadistic side of Jack's nature. The difference in their ages alone should have put some distance between them. On Jack's side, I can't imagine him risking angering John's brother by trying anything on with him, even if he were very attracted to the pretty young boy. The very thought that Jack might have had access to John would make me sick. (NT) -- Jane, 07:58:25 12/08/07 Sat

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.