Re: 書生小賢, 恕我直言… -- 香港自由派基督教留言版 Liberal Christian Forum of Hong Kong

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9 ]

Subject: Re: 書生小賢, 恕我直言…

Author:
天力

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 15:18:25 12/01/04 Wed
In reply to: XOX 's message, "Re: 書生小賢, 恕我直言…" on 10:05:23 11/30/04 Tue

或者可以咁睇拉,對於我們閱讀聖經,何謂對與錯呢,怎檥才能說聖經有錯呢?
對於馬太福音有關童女生子的事，我認為一方面可以說有錯，但也有對的地方
若你字面地理解童女生子的事,若耶穌真的不是由童貞女(身理上)所生,即該經文為錯,
但若我們透視經文的含意,表示著耶穌的獨特性及神性，我們又可以認為童女生子只是一個神話,去表達耶穌的這些特性,我們又不必視該經文為錯
故此,問題往往是我們如何理解經文,如何判斷該經文的體裁
而且,我們得承認,一般教會認為是可以字面解(即不當是神話,寓言,比喻...)的經文，會產生出得多問題,
最明顯的例子就是創世故事,很明顯有兩個版本
創1:1-2:3
創2:4-25
很明顯兩者是有衝突的,創造的次序不同,而且若我們將這些創造次序視為事科學事實,會有很多不合理的地方...
總之一切問題皆在於我們怎樣去「看」聖經

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]