Name (required):

  Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

  E-mail address (required):

* Type your message here:
>>>>I am referring to the knock-on ruling aginast Stacey >>>>Jones last night that occurred right at the end. >>>> >>>>I would be curious if anyone finds out the >>explanation >>>>for this ruling. >>>> >>>>Was the ruling that it touched Jones' hand then went >>>>back onto the foot (which is not a knock-on), or >that >>>>it hit the foot and then when it went forwards >>touched >>>>the hand (which is a knock-on). >>>> >>>>Viweing it on tv, it appeared that the touch was >>>>before it hit the foot, and there was no clear >>>>evidence that it hit the hand after it hit the foot, >>>>so I thought it was play on. >>> >>>I was at the game last night, from what I saw the >ball >>>hit his leg and touched his hands. Although I was a >>>fair distance away, so my observation could be >>>completely wrong. >>> >>>It was an interesting call none the less. >> >>are you saying that if you saw that in a game you >>would have given the field goal. it hit his foot then >>hands and was prepelled towards the opponent's goal >>line therefore giving a knock-on correct decision was >>made. > >What I was implying is that it was the second scenario >which Greg spoke about from my view, but that could be >wrong because I was more than 100m away and was >relying on the big screen to see it. From what I saw >the decision was correct.
Choose Message Icon: None :-) Happy ;-) Wink :-D Joy :} Smirk <:-} Innocent ☮ Peace >:) Mischief B-) Shades <3 Heart |O Yawn <:P Sick >:-( Angry :~( Sad ? Question *!* Alert Thumbs Up Thumbs Down (!) Idea [Info] Info Oo. Talk [ View Emoticons ]

Note: This forum is moderated -- new posts are not visible until approved.

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.