Re: 50周年有咩好慶祝 -- 九濟堂

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Apr 26 2026, 1:29:55, Sun

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, [8] ]

Subject: Re: 50周年有咩好慶祝

Author:
不憤

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 00:46:34 09/05/04 Sun
In reply to: 學生 's message, "50周年有咩好慶祝" on 16:33:36 09/04/04 Sat

<更正>

1)<(10)個有至少7個都係上堂時間搞破壞,阻礙進度?
2)<學校收生當然想愈(高)分愈好,可是在此情況下
公理可在?>

謹此致歉

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> Subject: 成王敗寇
Author: Richard [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 01:09:37 09/05/04 Sun 錯字更正 ""只求多福"" 自求多福 ""只要自己AL考好CE已經係對學校最好既回報"" 只要自己考好AL同CE已經係對學校最好既回報

[> [> Subject: 成王敗寇

Author:
Richard
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 01:28:10 09/05/04 Sun

對唔住, 之前按錯左野, 令到原來篇post冇出到, 反而令後來更正既post出左黎. 各位可無需理會上一篇post
外人睇一間學校既好壞只在乎公開試成績, 從來冇一間學校因為學生操行好而出名, 只有成績一流既學校被稱為名校. 我既睇法, 即使一間因為校園暴力事件而臭名遠播既學校, 只要係公開試拎返四五百條A, 出返幾個十優生就可以擺脫臭名, 成為地區名校或者全港名校.
香港教育制度一直"一試定生死", 只注重學生學業成績, 成績好等於有前途, 扼殺左學生既才能同平均發展. 我好同意之前有位師兄講"出到去,冇人理係係學校做咩post, 搞活動有幾勁, 只睇成績決定收唔收你". 所以有成績好就係好學生呢個情況出現, 但你同我都冇辦法去改變現實.
我深深感受到你既情況, 都親身經歷過你所講既"上堂搞破壞影響進度", 令到想聽書既學生無法聽書, 但我所見更加嚴重既係搞事人放學後唔係去補習社努力, 而係波照踢, 機照打, 唔做功課唔溫書, 測驗時拎到個位數字分數, 居然同其他人鬥低分, 越低分反而越威. 相信到公開試果陣, 受害者唔單止係佢本人, 更加影響濟記整體表現.
自求多福吧! 只要自己考好CE同AL已經係比濟記最大既禮物.

仲未有人答我問題, 濟記自波子老退休後, 成績大約邊幾年開始下滑? 有冇人諗過濟記出現今日既情況同最高決策者有關?

[> [> [> Subject: Re: 成王敗寇

Author:
學生
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 12:06:25 09/05/04 Sun

> 仲未有人答我問題, 濟記自波子老退休後,
>成績大約邊幾年開始下滑?
>有冇人諗過濟記出現今日既情況同最高決策者有關?

濟記約 4-5 年前開始下滑...我不大 Sure.
當然有關吧.

香港係97 大事慶祝.無人理當年樓市價高.抄樓花等...
結果咩事大家知.

如果sfxc 仲唔改善.或者以為學生問題.
將來害概係我地概師弟

香港成日講 : 今時今日咁概服務態度係唔夠嫁.

當有人話學生問題.如果你果班係乖概.<--咁多班一定有一班係掛.
但成績一樣不濟..咁係咩問題呢??

我想講係: 今時今日咁概教學,咁概質量質素的老師係唔夠嫁.
濟記唔再係咩 Band 1...我想band 2 就差唔多.

[> [> [> Subject: Re: 成王敗寇
Author: info [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 01:11:56 09/09/04 Thu > 仲未有人答我問題, 濟記自波子老退休後, >成績大約邊幾年開始下滑? depends on what u mean by 開始下滑 jar wor if u mean when the CE results started to fall below 100A, i heard from a "see hing" that in 1990 or 1991, there're still around 140A's. then it all went downhill from there since 1992 as for AL results, not sure lu