Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4] ]

Subject: Re: SEIU vs IBCO Author: Anonymous [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 10/10/07 7:40pm In reply to: 's message, "Re: SEIU vs IBCO" on 10/10/07 5:41pm Our Union is only as good as its leaders. We keep voting for people like Bob, Laurel, and Dave and expect different outcomes. IBCO hasn't done all that was promised, but a lot more than 509 ever did. Try some new blood that has a reason to fight for us. Bob and Laurel don't care about the 20 year bill because it doesn't matter to them. People that would be effected by it are the ones that would most likely push it. The 20 year bill gets heard next Thursday have they called anyone, arranged for good speakers to represent us. Asked for copies of EPRSs, job duties, job functions etc. to compare with the C.O.'s that work at the other minimum. We need to show that if a C.O. at NECC, NCCI-Min., SHI-Min, or BPRC center gets the 20 year bill we should get it to. If security staff at PCC or SMCC don't deserve the 20 year bill than the C.O.'s at the other minimums don't deserve it either. Since all CPO's like all C.O.'s can be transferred or called on to do security work all CPO's should get it. Job Hazards, PCC is the only medical minmum in the state. The staff there not only face the same possiblity of inmate assaults (like the other minmums), they face the greater danger of being exposed to a large population of chronic medical issues and open mental health inmates. These inmate can only be placed at PCC because it is a medical minimum. These are the unknown and unseen dangerous that the CPO staff face, that the C.O. staff (with 20 year retirement doesn't face). Encourage the E-Board to represent us by getting us some professional help. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date Re: SEIU vs IBCO Anonymous 10/11/07 4:31am Re: SEIU vs IBCO -- Anonymous, 10/11/07 7:52am