VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12[3]4 ]


Welcome to the OTHER CPO Board

The purpose of this board is to communicate and not dictate. No names required. Blatantly obscene posts defeat the purpose and will be deleted.

Links to Other Sites

COPS LOCAL 509 SBCC FRAMINGHAM NORFOLK BUGHOUSE III MCI CJ CONCORD SECC MASAC OCCC NCCI MCOFU

Mesothelioma

Subject: get the story straight


Author:
Anonymous
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 01/11/09 3:54pm

Cutting knew for quite some time that the servicing agreement was up on 12/31/08 however he nonchalantly looked into such boob-like options as making us program coordinators and putting us in a local with no transfer rights. Little effort was put into legislatively getting us out from under 509. When 1/1/09 came, Grunko refused to discuss renewing the servicing agreement. Cutting knew this was coming because Grunko told him repeatedly that he would not renew the servicing agreement. Grunko tried to discuss the return with Bob and Bob in his infinite wisdom just stonewalled him and ran to the IBCO attorneys. Since Bob refused to speak with Grunko, Grunko pulled his release time. In my opinion, BOB is the one who has not represented his members. He should have gone back to 509 and fought the battle while being allowed his release time to represent his members and deal with union issues such as labor mgmt. The union has not had a labor mgmt meeting since October. We have now missed the boat on discussing entrance procedures, contract negotiations have heated up yet Bob chose not to attend the latest meeting because he thought it was more important to meet with IBCO attorneys. You should have eaten some crow Bob and returned to 509 so that you could continue to represent members. Instead you selfishly acted like a spoiled child and threw a temper tantrum and got yourself and Ernie kicked out of your positions.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Replies:
Subject: Elections


Author:
Anonymous
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 01/14/09 7:05pm

lets start by getting everyone to vote this time around instead of the lame turn out last time!!!

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Replies:
Subject: Agency Fee


Author:
Anonymous
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 12/22/08 6:10pm

where's the cards, who's got the cards????

No union, is better than this one.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Replies:
Subject: Group 4 Legislation


Author:
Anonymous
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 04/21/08 4:06pm

URGENT ALERT

GROUP 4 LEGISLATION ACTION NEEDED!!!!
House … 2765
By Mr. Toomey of Cambridge, petition (accompanied by bill, House, No. 2765) of Timothy J. Toomey, Jr., and Robert L. Rice, Jr. relative to retirement benefits for certain employees of the Department of Correction. Public Service

The Commonwealth of Massachusetts

——————

PETITION OF:

Timothy J. Toomey, Jr.

Robert L. Rice, Jr.

In the Year Two Thousand and Seven.

An Act to amend retirement benefits for certain employees of the department of corrections.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Court assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:



SECTION 1. Group 4 paragraph (g) of sub-division 2 of section 3 of Chapter 32, as amended by section (1) of Chapter 71 of the acts of 1996, is hereby further amended, by inserting after the words “supervising prison camp officer,” the following words:— “correctional program officer I, II, III.”

________________________________________________________________________________________

Greetings,

Now that the State Budget has been released from House Ways and Means the Committee can begin to take up other legislation pending in the Committee. President Cutting met with Chairman Deleo before the Bill was released to his Committee and the Executive Board will be attending a follow-up meeting with him shortly.
IT IS ESSENTIAL THAT ALL MEMBERS HELP PUSH THE BILL IN ORDER TO GET IT RELEASED TO THE HOUSE FLOOR FOR A VOTE!
IMMEDIATELY CALL; PREFERABLY WRITE AND EMAIL YOUR LEGISLATORS ASKING THAT THEY SUPPORT THIS BILL (H2765) AND REQUEST THAT IT BE RELEASED FROM WAYS & MEANS!
IT WOULD BE MOST EFFECTIVE AT THIS POINT , IF YOU CONTACTED THE MEMBERS OF THE WAYS AND MEANS COMMITTEE (LISTED BELOW) ESPECIALLY IF THEY ARE YOUR LEGISLATORS.
DON’T STOP WITH JUST DOING THIS YOURSELF. ASK YOUR FAMILY AND FRIENDS TO DO THE SAME.
BE PREPARED TO ANSWER QUESTIONS ABOUT YOUR DUTIES AND THE HAZARDOUS NATURE OF YOUR ASSIGNMENT! SEE LOBBY SHEET INCLUDED BELOW!!!!!
LEGISLATORS CONTACT INFORMATION CAN BE FOUND AT <a rel=nofollow target=_blank href="http://www.mass.gov/legis/">http://www.mass.gov/legis/</a> .



If you don’t know who your Representative is go to <a rel=nofollow target=_blank href="http://www.mass.gov/legis/">http://www.mass.gov/legis/</a> . You can find your reps. Name and contact info there by City/Town ; precinct etc.



The key members to contact are :



DeLeo of Winthrop **** Chair
St. Fleur of Boston **** Vice Chair
Vallee of Franklin **** Vice Chair

Ways and Means - Members appointed to the committee:
DeLeo of Winthrop **** Chair
St. Fleur of Boston **** Vice Chair
Vallee of Franklin **** Vice Chair
Speliotis of Danvers
Hynes of Marshfield
Kennedy of Brockton
Galvin of Canton
Kafka of Stoughton
Greene of Billerica
Quinn of Dartmouth
Kujawski of Webster
Garry of Dracut
Naughton of Clinton
Creedon of Brockton
Finegold of Andover
Wolf of Cambridge
Malia of Boston
Timilty of Milton
Linsky of Natick
Falzone of Saugus
Gobi of Spencer
Grant of Beverly
Lantigua of Lawrence
Koczera of New Bedford
Speranzo of Pittsfield
Moran of Boston
deMacedo of Plymouth
Polito of Shrewsbury
Evangelidis of Holden
Loscocco of Holliston
Perry of Sandwich

List of matters currently referred to the committee

House, No. 2765 -- Corrections department, -retirement.













H2765

An Act to amend retirement benefits

for certain employees of the department of corrections.



§ Presently, some 8000 Public Safety Officers who work in the Commonwealths Prisons and Houses of

Correction are classified in Group 4 of the States’ retirement System



Ÿ Correctional Program Officers “C.P.O.s” (approximately 300) have been denied this same opportunity. Just under 40% of the Officers referred to in this Bill are women. Of the positions in the DOC Charged with care and Custody, CPOs have the highest number of Female Officers.



Ÿ C.P.O.s provide security, inmate transportation, and supervision of inmate community work crews and are qualified for and sworn in as Special State Police Officers.



Ÿ C.P.O.s provide non-therapeutic counseling, direct inmates towards program participation and provide care and custody at all levels of security.



Ÿ C.P.O.s are Civil Service, Public Safety Officers who meet all the requirements of the Correction Officers and Deputy Sheriffs who are currently classified in Group 4. In fact C.P.O.s are the only position among those titles that require at minimum 2 years prior related experience or a Bachelors Degree as a requirement of hiring.



Ÿ C.P.O.s attend the same Recruit Academy as all titles within the department who are currently classified in Group 4 of the retirement system.



Ÿ C.P.O.s are the only group of employees within the Department of Correction who have Care and Custody who are not classified in Group 4 of the retirement system.



Ÿ A PERAC study completed this year has noted that the financial impact to the Commonwealth of placing CPOs in Group 4 would be minimal



Legislators- If you have any questions regarding our legislation or would like to join us on a tour of our worksites please feel free to contact :

IBCO LOCAL R1-75 President Robert M. Cutting 508-328-9300.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Replies:
Subject: Please tell me it ani't so......................


Author:
Anonymous
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 12/ 1/08 2:24pm

information gleaned says that our Chapter president is a PERMANENT CORRECTION OFFICER?? How does such a person become a COPIII, and the figurehead of a CPO"S Union? And, how does one continue to hold down a permanent position in one civil service title and advance through the ranks of another, (years in the making) without becoming PERMANENT IN THE TITLE???????????

This smack of serious collusion and opens the door to a myriad of conflicts I don't EVEN want to think about!

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Replies:
Subject: from today's herald


Author:
Anonymous
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 12/ 3/08 5:05pm

the story about state police little known perk

"The governor’s office told the Herald last night all active contract negotiations are being suspended while the state braces for more bad economic news."

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: ??????????


Author:
Anonymous
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 11/13/08 2:29pm

is there anything NEW on ANYTHING????????????????????

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Replies:
Subject: Hey! I hear Local 509 is tryin to force us back!


Author:
Anonymous
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 11/22/08 5:55pm

Who wants to go back with those hippies? What say you?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Replies:
Subject: contract


Author:
Anonymous
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 09/30/08 8:34am

I'll give some contract news, 2% for 6 months beginning 7/1/08, no retro. I have good reliable info, trust me. BK

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Replies:
Subject: Parole Packages


Author:
Anonymous
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 01/16/08 6:24pm

Here we go again.....tomorrow...3 more parole packages to be submitted.....Opps I forgot the upgrade....I think some other people have also....as I said before....It's not so much the work but parole has more people than us to do this..Again I'm glad our union is standing up for us....Bessy

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Replies:
Subject: staffing matrix


Author:
Anonymous
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 07/31/08 9:13pm

Does anyone know anything about the staffing study that was conducted? It was due to be released on July 22nd. Any comments from our Union or will we have to wait for our cons. or ex-cons. to tell us we are understaffed yada yada yada?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Replies:
Subject: illegal promotions


Author:
Anonymous
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 08/10/08 7:16am

Sex offender unit CPO A/B was secretly promoted to a CPOC. The position was not posted for others to transfer into and cards were not sent out for those above her on the list (and there are a couple above her on the list) to sign. This bullshit needs to stop.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Replies:
Subject: Contract


Author:
Anonymous
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 09/21/08 9:31am

What's the latest? Can we get passed the FMLA and SL2 bullshit? These issues affect virtually no one. We got screwed on the upgrade, we're getting screwed on the 20/50, and now what? Anythng? Is anyone else sick about this?

All I read now is our latest main table negotiation date was changed to a union caucus. Caucus? WTF is that? Really, what IS that? (Except a reason for our union reps to get another day away from their institutions while accomplishing nothing.)

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Replies:
Subject: Unit Managers Returning??


Author:
Anonymous
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 08/25/08 11:05am

Anyone else hear a rumor that the DOC is bringing back unit managers??

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Replies:
Subject: new pre-releases?


Author:
Anonymous
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 03/ 2/08 11:18am

The state’s new prison chief wants to reverse what he sees as the failed “busting rocks” philosophy of the past two decades and make inmate rehabilitation and re-entry a cornerstone of his tenure.

In a wide-ranging interview with the Herald, Department of Correction Commissioner Harold W. Clarke, 56, said the punishment-only approach ushered in during the William F. Weld years - when the former two-term governor famously declared that state prison should be a rock-breaking tour of hell - has made society less safe and failed to provide exiting inmates with the basic skills needed to lead lawful or productive lives.

“We got tough and what have we gotten for that? Do we feel any safer?” asked Clarke, who began on Nov. 26, 2007, after years at the helm of prison systems in Nebraska and Washington state. “Rates of recidivism are climbing. We are going in the wrong direction and this is getting worse.”

He cited statistics that show that 80 percent of state prison inmates read below a sixth-grade level and more than 50 percent were unemployed at the time of their incarceration. A Pew Center on the States report released Thursday found that close to 2.3 million Americans - one in every 100 American adults - are behind bars.

Some 97 percent of those inmates - 11,000 of whom are in Massachusetts state prisons - will be released one day, he noted.

Clarke said Massachusetts recidivism rates are alarming. In 1999, for example, of the 2,1912 inmates released to the street, 589 (20 percent) were re-incarcerated within the first year of post-release, 352 (12 percent) in their second year of post-release, and 185 (6 percent) in their third year of post-release, for a total of 1,126 (30 percent) recidivists over the three-year period.

“Good re-entry is good public safety,” said Clarke, who most recently ran the Washington State Department of Corrections for two years. “Offenders do not come to prison to be punished. They came to prison as punishment.”

While touring DOC facilities for the past three months, Clarke noted he is repeatedly given the same welcome from staff, guards and inmates alike: “Hi. How are you? Welcome and good luck.” He said: “Everyone seems to agree this is a job that requires a lot of luck.”

Clarke said he wants to jump on prisoner classification, concerns about the professionalism of some correction officers and security related to inmate shakedowns. While Clarke said he has not observed any serious security breaches, he said he is concerned about staff exposing the facilities to security problems by “cutting corners.”

He said the DOC has a technical assistance grant from the National Institute of Corrections to conduct a review of the system’s culture, especially relationships between staff and offenders. Clarke, who unlike his predecessors wants to be out front both inside the prisons and before the public and the Legislature, made clear he has no problem being tough.

“We need to at all times be professional in our actions. If it requires us using force or taking measures to control an offender’s behavior when they are being abusive or posing a danger we must do so. But when that behavior on our part is not necessarily required then we must show the offender the other side,” Clarke said.

Clarke, who has 34 years of experience in corrections, recalled years ago hearing Weld’s oft-quoted statements that prison should be “a tour through the circles of hell” where inmates should learn the “joys of busting rocks.”

“I think that would be totally counterproductive to what we are trying to achieve,” said Clarke.

The DOC is in the process of reviewing its programs for re-entry, job training, education and substance abuse treatment, Clarke said. Of the system’s 11,003 inmates, there are only 250 prisoners assigned to four pre-release centers, Clarke said. The DOC discharges 2,500 inmates annually.

In Washington, about 700 of the 18,500 inmates in the state prison system were enrolled in a work-release program, Clarke said. A new law there requires the building of one new pre-release center in Washington each year over the next 10 years, he said.

The Massachusetts Correction Officers Federated Union, which feuded bitterly with former DOC Commissioner Kathleen M. Dennehy, is hoping to have a better relationship with Clarke, said union president Steve Kenneway.

“This guy seems to want to be part of the solution for our issues as we have committed to be part of the solution for the department’s problems,” said Kenneway.

He said the union is opposed to re-allocating funds used for security to pay for re-entry measures.

“We’ve been painted as this group that’s anti-re-entry. What we are opposed to is taking funds from the security end of the this business to fund a program that is basically experimental,” Kenneway said.

Lawmakers said there is legislative support to focus on re-entry.

“No one is talking about sending people to Harvard, giving them a nice TV and pampering them. We are saying, Let’s segregate the dangerous and the sexually dangerous and let’s look at the 90 percent of substance abusers in jail and get them treatment and get them ready to come back,” said state Rep. Michael A. Costello (D-Newburyport), chairman of the House Committee on Public Safety and Homeland Security, the legislative panel that oversees DOC matters.

State Sen. James E. Timilty (D-Walpole), whose district includes the maximum security prison at MCI-Cedar Junction, said the morale of correction officers has improved since Clarke took over.

“I am excited that this new commissioner is here and that he’s engaged and I want him to succeed,” Timilty said. “The re-entry centerpiece is not just the commissioner talking about that. That’s the correction officers too.”

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Replies:
Subject: irony


Author:
Anonymous
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 08/12/08 7:59pm

Veronica Madden, Steve Silva, Jeffrey Quick, Ken Nelson, Tim Hall, Ron Duval, Harold Clarke, James Bender, Steve Ayala all get their own private vehicles yet several of these people are the same ones that want to make sure that we don't get mileage for trainings.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Replies:
Subject: LMAO


Author:
Anonymous
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 07/31/08 9:02pm

It is funny reading through all the Mass DOC sites as an ex-con.

The ire between the CO's and the CPO's is especially ironic, cosidering.

I spent 12 years in the DOC, and truth be told, the most effective security I have seen was during my last couple of locked years at PCC. And that is after Walpole, Norfolk, Shirley, etc....

The CPO's there (2000-2002) were nasty good at their job. No need for names, but you know who you are.

But I got to tell ya, the DOS was just plain creepy.

Anyhoos.

And no, I am not a PCC staffer. Username is "Meh" on other DOC board sites. Ex-con, yadda yadda yadda.....

And work on your site, PCC - is lame empty.

;)

Thought you all were supposed to be using divide and conquer on us and not between yourselves.

Sorry for sarcasm (just tired) - and post is made with respect to all.

A former Rocketteer,

Meh

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: Information


Author:
Anonymous
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 06/ 4/08 2:27pm

The last post on this site by the e-board was 4/21. Could we get an update on SOMETHING???

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Replies:
Subject: teaching PREA?


Author:
Anonymous
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 04/19/08 1:37pm

CPO to Inmates: "this is how it's done,just follow my demonstration"

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Subject: teaching


Author:
Anonymous
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 04/18/08 5:37pm

Is anyone aware that CPOs are going to be teaching PREA to the inmates?

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Replies:
Subject: meetings


Author:
Anonymous
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 04/ 3/08 5:38pm

there isn't much to tell about mtgs- the "3-some" gets up there and their lips move but sorry nothing to tell- the president still is so out of touch that he insists that we have always done the INS job- telling the federal agent that a guy has a place of birth outside the US is a lot different than DOING the whole job- he's absolutely clueless. When people tell him the state of affairs at their facility - he actually said (yes quote) "what do you want me to do?" Like the CPO was supposed to hold his hand and correct the issue. Lead -ership -no such thing w/ this union. Have you ever heard of a union meeting w/out someone taking minutes? They don't want their lame mtgs on record.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
Replies:
Main index ] [ Archives: 12[3]4 ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.