Peace vs. Dead Argument(s) -- kellie's diary

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4] ]

Subject: Peace vs. Dead Argument(s)

Author:
Jonathan

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 13:54:40 08/08/07 Wed
In reply to: Leah 's message, "You're all correct" on 05:31:55 08/08/07 Wed

There is a not so subtle difference between constructive criticism (welcomed) and bullying (unwelcomed). Your attention to detail when comparing the woman's flesh and blood, pride and joy, to a common Paris Hilton accessory goes far beyond what I would have considered constructive criticism. Your attacks were too personal to be taken lightly by her or any of those who allign with her.

Are you going to continue to defend yourself (sarcastically or not) against a legion of her fans plus those who just consider your remarks rude all by themselves, or are you going to step back into the shadows?

I reccomend the latter. The former just ignites useless arguments as to whether or not you were right in what you said, which doesn't make any difference to me or any other listeners anyway. You're never going to truly believe you have been invalidated in what you've said. The listeners here are never going to let you continue to demean Kellie in the way you do peacefully.

It's cyclical wastes of your/all the listeners' time. I'm not calling you any bad names. I only wished evil on you because you attacked Kellie's focal point of "happy" by basically calling the baby (who cannot defend herself) mentally challenged, and since I was diagnosed with cerebral palsy and thus "mentally challenged" several months after birth, I have every right in the world to wish some degree of evil on you for implying the term/concept so casually.

Don't continue to beat on a dead horse. Please, please, please. But if that's your intent...don't you have better things to do, ma'am?

May you go with God,
Someone "Special"

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
Re: You're all correct	Stacey (Ticked)	15:31:44 08/08/07 Wed