Re: Hands Off Is a guideline not a policy -- Loss Prevention

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4] ]

Subject: Re: Hands Off Is a guideline not a policy

Author:
Marc

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10:14:14 05/20/07 Sun
In reply to: Nick 's message, "Hands Off Is a guideline not a policy" on 19:30:07 07/20/05 Wed

>I don't think that there is a retailer out there, at
>least I hope not that means "hands off no matter what"
>It even aggrivates me when they "the retailer" say
>that you "have a right to defend yourself" . Gee

God I remember the beginning of my LP career back in 1980. Hand cuffing a lifter was policy. You could be fired for not cuffing a shoplifter except for juveniles and senior citizens. There was no restitution! No civil demand. EVERYONE WENT TO JAIL! and eventually to court. But as the saying goes; "All good things must come to an end."

P.S. I think I recognize some Marshalls or Maxx lingo in that last post?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]