Re: is this right -- Loss Prevention

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4] ]

Subject: Re: is this right

Author:
clay

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 13:56:44 11/26/07 Mon
In reply to: James 's message, "Re: is this right" on 00:23:57 11/25/07 Sun

> In my experience where I work, I'd have to say that I
>agree. Even though the person was caught and
>convicted of shoplifting in one place(city or state),
>and then spotted in another store of the same company,
>yes, they do have the right to stop the
>individual(s)and have them arrested for tresspassing.
>Especially if the company has the proof from the
>previous incident then there shouldn't be a problem.

even though he was told by the courts to only stay away from the store in the city he was arrested. he has documentation from the courts saying to only stay out of the one particular store. not any other. and as far as i know was not told by the arresting store he couldnt go anywhere else

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]