Re: The deadliest threat we have ever faced. -- General Discussions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 14:22:34 12/03/05 Sat
Author: Ashley
Subject: Re: The deadliest threat we have ever faced.
In reply to: Jason 's message, "Re: The deadliest threat we have ever faced." on 02:22:10 12/03/05 Sat

>>Oh come on, it's only 2005, the planet has plenty of
>>resources, prolly more than 50% of which have not been
>>even found yet. This planet ain't that old, it's like
>>a baby.
>
>That isn`t what the scientific community is telling
>us. They are very worried about the rate at which
>natural resources are being consumed. As virtually
>every corner of this planet is known about, it would
>be odd if most natural resources hadn`t been
>discovered yet. The planet is old(4.5 billion years)
>but that`s not relevent.What is important is that
>humans consume more resources that the Earth can
>naturally replenish in any given period of time.

Humans aren't depleting as much as those nut-job junk scientists say. Jen's right, there are a lot of places with remaining resources, besides, we're constantly developing new technology so that we won't have to use the natural resources anymore. There are plenty of reserves remaining, but we have little to worry about. Besides, bear in mind that most of those who are causing problems for their environment aren't White, traditionally Christian societies, like you might hear about, but they're backwards third world countries who can't even grasp the concept of national unity.

>
>>Everyone talks about this stuff everyday,
>>even stuff like Global Warming, that's like the big
>>thing this year cuz of all these record outbreaks of
>>hurricanes. Don't read int too much of what you
>>see.....I mean how does one know that when someone
>>reports these things that they're not actually trying
>>to create like a panic & draw attention?
>
>Everybody does talk about global warming too much.
>True. I know it`s important but sometimes people
>mistaken any weather anomoly as a sign of GW.The fact
>is, we don`t know how much warming is directly caused
>by human activity but our main global problem in my
>view is overpopulation.

Here's how much is caused by human activity - about as much, if not less, than what was caused by the dinosaurs in the mesozoic, and the trilobites in the paleozoic.

Overpopulation isn't really that much of a problem, it's mostly confined to third-world and fourth-world countries which are overpopulated only because of getting foreign aid from the new world, Europe, the middle east, and north Africa. Notice that north America and all still White central American and south American countries, along with Europe, the mid east, and north Africa don't really have overpopulation problems. The only exceptions to this are east Asian nations, which are first world or second world (Communist), and overpopulated.

>
> Ur 19,
>>life's too short to be worrying 'bout stuff like that.
>> I mean, I'm like 22 & I'm not the least bit worried
>>about somethin like this. Don't worry about the
>>little things, trust me on that one Jas. :-)
>
>Yeah I do live my life to the full and am usually
>very cheerful :)
>But it`s my future grandchildren I fear for. They will
>almost certainly have a poorer quality of life than
>our generation does.

Well, if we don't do something about the third world invasion, we WILL have a poorer quality of life, but I think a high quality of life like you will see due to advancements by the White man such as hydrogen powered cars will be what improves life.

Note for everyone: I'm a far right hardline conservative when it comes to politics, except that I'm not xenophobic, and I don't place TOO much emphasis on religion.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]