Poor investigative work costing the taxpayers money each day -- Clatsop County Matters

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

04/18/26 2:19pm

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2, 3, 4 ]

Subject: Poor investigative work costing the taxpayers money each day

Author:
Sandy

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10/13/06 2:44pm
In reply to: Josh 's message, "Ask the DA" on 08/ 7/06 11:00am

How much money, notwithstanding the police budget for the initial investigation but adding on costs of any further investigation ordered by the DA's office/indicated per grand jury indictment, was spent to prosecute Tom Cain?

How often does a grand jury refuse to indict when the DA's office asks?

How much money will the DA's office be wasting to prosecute the two boys, represented by Roman, tagged with alleged fishing violations when they were 15 years old that is now 2 years ago? Corks not red enough and other such nonsense. A lie told to your ADA that these two had outstanding warrants in Washington kept them from getting this case thrown out last year, leading to the judge saying if they kept their noses clean for one year this case would be thrown out. Now, over a year has gone by and another lie that cases "pending" against these two young fishermen in Washington state's Pacific County is keeping them from having this all dismissed.

What is the matter with you that you allow your ADAs to be led by the nose by the lies of dirty DAs in another county, especially those counties that are the haven of the Oregon Fishermen hater, Mike Censi?

These two juveniles do not have any outstanding warrants, nor a case pending. Neither of them have so much as a parking ticket or an overdue library ticket on either side of the river.

This is flat out sloppy investigative work by your office. All it would take is a phone call and a fax to resolve this case, in particular, and the matter would be resolved. However, it will drag on and on, creating havoc for that fishing family, and you become a partner in the harassment of one of the backbone industries of our area. And for what? To add two violations to two young boys' records and collect $1000 each from them and another year probation? HARASSMENT and who pays for them being on probation? Who watches them? Who do they check in to/with? And how many people are checking in with that same person on the same type of petty charges?

THIS IS JUSTICE in clatsop county?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
and.....	Curious George	10/13/06 11:05pm
doesn't someone have to hand over "the books" -- asking, 10/14/06 12:45pm You Can Petition For A Financial Audit Through Secretary Of State's Office -- Patrick McGee, 10/14/06 1:03pm