Garner -- Clatsop County Matters

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

04/18/26 2:19pm

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2, 3, 4 ]

Subject: Garner

Author:
F. Lee

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 11/ 3/06 1:06am
In reply to: Josh 's message, "Poll" on 11/ 2/06 7:23am

What about the numerous reports circulating through the legal community during the Garner trial that you used real time voice stress analysis computer programs on Garner during direct examination in trial? If true, and there isn't any reason to doubt that it is true considering how many people in the courthouse were talking about it, isn't that considered unethical, maybe illegal and certainly unfair to the defense? Couldn't you have won a conviction on your own ability rather than have to resort to gimickery, expensive technology and unethical practice? Did you have such little confidence in the State's case that you deemed in necessary to compromise the concept of a "fair" trial?

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
Silence is golden?	Cuckoo The Bird Girl	11/12/06 2:23am
Silence -- abe, 11/13/06 1:15pm