One step forward, 3 steps back -- Clatsop County Matters

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

04/18/26 12:51pm

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4 ]

Subject: One step forward, 3 steps back

Author:
Walter Richards

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 09/13/06 11:41am
In reply to: gene roddenberry 's message, "and the rockets red glare" on 09/12/06 10:36pm

Asked: if the reason the terrorists attacked was jealousy of our freedoms, as purported by the current regime, and their desire to curtail it, they have won have they not?

Answer: Yes, there is less freedom in America since 9/11/2001. But there's more freedom in Iraq and Afghanistan. Not to mention that Libya has ceased all support for terrorist operations.

So, if they did attack to "curtail our freedoms" (which, btw, I don't buy) ... they got a small step forward, and 3 steps back.

-

Btw - Most of the freedoms curtailed in America were already losing ground. Of course, it was still all going on in the name of "the children" and "safety".

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject	Author	Date
wake-up wally!!!!!!!!!!!	mohamet	09/13/06 4:41pm