Re: OBAMA IS TOO INEXPERIENCED TO BE PRESIDENT -- Massachusetts Correction Officers Forum For Political Discussion

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4 ]

Subject: Re: OBAMA IS TOO INEXPERIENCED TO BE PRESIDENT

Author:
Just my observation

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 06:23:40 10/17/08 Fri
In reply to: Obama may win 's message, "Re: OBAMA IS TOO INEXPERIENCED TO BE PRESIDENT" on 02:53:22 10/17/08 Fri

Last night on the Letterman show, John McCain was asked if he thought Sarah Palin had enough experience to be President. McCain answered that there was a gentleman from Arkansas that was an name that did a great job an a person for whom he now has great respect (Bill Clinton). He also said that A cowboy who knew nothing about foreign policy ended up as one of the greats (Ronald Regan). He went on to say that Sarah Palin has good leadership qualities.

With that said, the line about Obama not having the experience was put to bed by McCain himself. If the argument was to continue, than it can be argued that John McCain admittedly lacks the experience or education in economics, which, at this time weighs heavily on his campaign.

I respectfully disagree with the above post with regards to both being bad choices. Both candidates have a tremendous amount of education, imagination, and experience in dealing with people. They also both surround themselves with highly competent people (all great leaders do that)that would be advising them on various issues.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]