VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123[4] ]


WELCOME TO THE MASSACHUSETTS CORRECTION OFFICER'S FORUM FOR POLITICAL DISCUSSIONS!

All postions and parties are welcome. All we ask is that you try not to make your messages overly offensive. Try to keep things light and informative. Remember we're all in this together. Thank you and stay safe!

Cedar Junction- MCOFU Homepage- Union Issues- Framingham- Old Colony- Gardner-
Concord-
SECC Alumni- The Bughouse- SBCC- Bay State- Shattuck- MASAC- Eboard Candidates


Subject: If he isn't elected President, John McCain has the right credentials to be a DOC manager


Author:
Just say NO to McCain
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 06:30:54 09/15/08 Mon

John McCain:
Unfit to serve as Commander-In-Chief
The spoiled son of military privilege got a free ride throughout his military career despite repeated instances of sex scandals and screw-ups
By Ted Sampley
U.S. Veteran Dispatch
January 27, 2008
John Sidney McCain III entered the United States Naval Academy at Annapolis, Maryland in 1954. Young McCain wanted to become an admiral. He planned to be the "first son and grandson of four star admirals" to achieve such a distinction. But that was not to be. McCain III possessed none of the innate character and discipline traits that helped mold his father and grandfather into great military leaders.

His father, John S. "Junior" McCain, and grandfather, John S. McCain, Sr., were famous four-star Admirals in the U.S. Navy. His father commanded U.S. forces in Europe before becoming commander of American forces fighting in Vietnam. His grandfather commanded naval aviation at the Battle of Okinawa in 1945. Both men became highly influential in U.S. Navy operations.

At the Academy, aside being known as a "rowdy, raunchy, underachiever" who resented authority, Midshipman McCain became infamous as a leader among his fellow midshipmen for organizing "off-Yard activities" and hard drinking parties. Robert Timberg wrote in his book, The Nightingale's Song, that "being on liberty with John McCain was like being in a train wreck."

McCain's grades were "marginal." He drew so many demerits for breaking curfew and other discipline issues that he graduated fifth from the bottom of the class of 1958. Despite his low "class standing," and no doubt because of the influence of his family of famous Admirals, McCain was leap-frogged ahead of more qualified applicants and granted a coveted slot to be trained as a navy pilot.

Good Party Animal - Bad Pilot:

He spent the next two and a half years as a "naval aviator in training" at Naval Air Station Pensacola in Florida and Naval Air Station Corpus Christi in Texas, flying A-1 Skyraiders.

While a pilot trainee, McCain continued to party hard. He drove a Corvette and dated an exotic dancer named "Marie the Flame of Florida." Timberg wrote that McCain "learned to fly at Pensacola, though his performance was below par, at best good enough to get by. He liked flying, but didn't love it."

McCain Lost Five Military Aircraft

McCain, the "below par" pilot, eventually lost 5 military aircraft, the first during a training flight in 1958 when he plunged into Corpus Christi Bay while trying to land. The Navy ignored the crash and graduated McCain in 1960.

While deployed in the Mediterranean, the hard partying McCain lost a second aircraft. Timberg described the crash: "Flying too low over the Iberian Peninsula, he took out some power lines which led to a spate of newspaper stories in which he was predictably identified as the son of an admiral."

Unscathed, McCain returned to Pensacola Station where he was promoted to flight instructor for Naval Air Station Meridian in Mississippi. The airfield at Meridian, McCain Field, was named in honor of McCain's grandfather.

In 1964 McCain became involved with Carol Shepp, a model from Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, he had met at Annapolis. They were married in Philadelphia on July 3, 1965.

Flight instructor McCain lost a third aircraft while flying a Navy trainer solo to Philadelphia for an Army-Navy football game. Timberg wrote that McCain radioed, "I've got a flameout" before ejecting at one thousand feet. McCain parachuted onto a beach moments before his plane slammed into a clump of trees.

The Navy dismissed the crash as "unavoidable" and assigned McCain to the aircraft carrier USS Forrestal in December 1966, which was patrolling the Mediterranean Sea and Atlantic Ocean. In Spring 1967, the Forrestal was assigned to join the Operation Rolling Thunder bombing campaign against North Vietnam.

McCain lost his fourth plane on board the Forrestal on July 29, 1967 when a rocket inadvertently slammed into his bomb laden jet. McCain escaped, but the explosions that followed killed 134 sailors. McCain was transferred from the badly damaged Forrestal to the USS Oriskany. Shortly afterwards, on Oct. 26, 1967, he was shot down and captured by the Vietnamese.

Post-POW Years: Political Ambition and a New, Young, Rich Wife

Upon his release from North Vietnam and return to the United States in 1973, McCain reunited with his wife, Carol, who had been permanently crippled in a car accident while he was a POW.

Still yearning to become an admiral, McCain enrolled in the National War College at Fort McNair in Washington, D.C. and underwent physical therapy in order to fly again. The Navy excused his permanent disabilities and reinstated him to flight status, effectively positioning him for promotion.

Timberg described McCain's advancement: "in the fall of 1974, McCain was transferred to Jacksonville as the executive officer of Replacement Air Group 174, the long-sought flying billet at last a reality. A few months later, he assumed command of the RAG, which trained pilots and crews for carrier deployments. The assignment was controversial, some calling it favoritism, a sop to the famous son of a famous father and grandfather, since he had not first commanded a squadron, the usual career path."

While Executive Officer and later as Squadron Commander McCain used his authority to arrange frequent flights that allowed him to carouse with subordinates and "engage in extra-marital affairs."

This was a violation of the Uniform Code of Military Justice rules against adultery and fraternization with subordinates. But, as with all his other past behaviors, McCain was never penalized; instead he always got away with his transgressions.

Timberg wrote, "Off duty, usually on routine cross-country flights to Yuma and El Centro, John started carousing and running around with women. To make matters worse, some of the women with whom he was linked by rumor were subordinates . . . At the time the rumors were so widespread that, true or not, they became part of McCain's persona, impossible not to take note of."

In early 1977, Admiral Jim Holloway, Chief of Naval Operations promoted McCain to captain and transferred him from his command position "to Washington as the number-two man in the Navy's Senate liaison office. McCain was promptly given total control of the office. It wasn't long before the "fun loving and irreverent" McCain had turned the liaison office into a "late-afternoon gathering spot where senators and staffers, usually from the Armed Services and Foreign Relations committees, would drop in for a drink and the chance to unwind."

In 1979, while attending a military reception in Hawaii, McCain met and fell in love with Cindy Lou Hensley, 17 years his junior, who was the daughter of James W. Hensley, a wealthy Anheuser-Busch distributor from Phoenix, Arizona. McCain filed for and obtained an uncontested divorce from his wife in Florida on April 2, 1980 and promptly married Cindy on May 17, 1980.

He resigned from the Navy in 1981 and went to work for his father-in-law in Phoenix; where he used the opportunity to make powerful and wealthy friends in Arizona including banker Charles Keating and Duke Tully, the editor-in-chief of the Arizona Republic. Keating was later convicted of fraud, racketeering, and conspiracy and Tully was disgraced for concocting a phony military record of combat in Korea and Vietnam including medals for heroism.

McCain ran for Arizona's First Congressional District in 1982. McCain won the congressional seat. In 1987 McCain was elected to the Senate.

Join the U.S. Veteran Dispatch Eagle message board.
Subject: Important Reminder - State Board Retirement Election


Author:
votesteen@hotmail.com
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 22:38:47 10/07/07 Sun


Attention

State Workers and Retirees
Do not forget to Vote


Our important election for the Massachusetts State Board of Retirement is this October. Ballots will be mailed to your home on October 12, 2007.

Vote
Michael
Steen


Lieutenant – Massachusetts department of corrections
Bachelors Degree – University of Massachusetts
Masters Degree – Anna Maria College

Feel free to contact me with any questions, comments or concerns at votesteen@hotmail.com or visit my website at votesteen.bravehost.com
Replies:
Subject: Hey EBoard Retards


Author:
McCain/Romney???????
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 12:09:48 07/22/08 Tue

Are we still going to back McCain when he chooses Romney as his Vice President candidate??
Replies:
Subject: Thank you for your hard work at www.massretirees.com


Author:
Dubrule
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 22:13:45 06/21/08 Sat

reposted from www.massretirees.com

June 12, 2008 - We are now approaching the final days of meetings between the House and Senate FY’09 State Budget Conference Committee members. While the House and Senate earlier voted on a new $16,000 COLA base for state and teacher retirees, subject to a final budget vote, the House budget did not include local government retirees. However, the Senate did unanimously vote for an amendment, which would include retires for all of our 104 local retirement systems.
The statewide opposition by the press has focused on all retirement systems – state, teachers as well as local. The Mass. Municipal Association (MMA) has focused on local retirement systems, portending dire fiscal results if the legislation passes. In a letter to individual members of the House and Senate the MMA predicted staggering costs to the cities and towns if the House and Senate vote in favor of the bill. We have countered with truthful fiscal data and the very stringent requirement for county and regional governments to accept the proposed statute.

By now, the members of the Conference Committee have heard from both sides. We thank you for writing or calling members of the Legislature and Conference Committee on behalf of this $10-a-month maximum COLA increase. In these waning days, please continue to make contact with members of the Conference Committee and your own Rep. or Senator on behalf of the small $10 COLA adjustment. It’s the right thing to do.

God Bless You,

Ralph White, Association President
Shawn Duhamel, Legislative Liaison
Subject: American voters getting sucked in


Author:
one who knows
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 16:15:28 02/20/08 Wed

I can't believe that people vote for a guy like obama, who has a campagne based on false hope and no substance. "A change we can believe in" Well whats the change, has anyone asked? I'll give you the ansewer, there is no change. How can our educated young, middle aged and seinor voters be so blind or desperate to be sucked into this rederick. I thought only us assholes in Massachusetts fell for this bull when we voted in "yes we can" Deval Patrick. He turned out to be a real GEM. I can't believe were going to put a Muslum in the white house. "GOD HELP US"
Replies:
Subject: RIP


Author:
SAD
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 09:40:38 06/08/08 Sun

Michael P. "Mick" Rafferty, 51, passed away peacefully on Friday, June 6, 2008, at home, after a year and a half battle with cancer.

He was born in Worcester, the son of Arthur and Eileen (Flynn) Rafferty and made his home in Westminster.

Mick was employed the last 26 years as a Corrections Officer at the North Central Correctional Institute in Gardner where he thoroughly enjoyed his role as a Sector Union Steward. He was a member of the Boston Labor Guild and a passionate advocate for his fellow officers and their workplace conditions.

Mick enjoyed fishing, hunting, boating, orienteering and listening to his traditional Irish music. His fondest memories and favorite vacations were time spent with his wife and children either at the rustic family "Camp Kellzraff" in the woods of Maine or fishing and boating the waters of Cape Cod. His times spent at camp with his in-laws and friends, fishing, hunting, four-wheeling and sledding were precious to him. Mick was a proud father of his three children and excited and thrilled with choices they have made and educational and life goals they have set for themselves. Mick immensely enjoyed watching his daughter learn to Irish step-dance and his sons play hockey and baseball. Mick will be sorely missed by his inseperable companion and personal therapist, his blocky Yellow Labrador Retriever.

Mick leaves his wife of 23 years, Joan (Kelly) Rafferty; his daughter, Caitlin Kelly Rafferty; his two sons, Padraic Kelly Rafferty and Liam Kelly Rafferty; his father, Arthur Rafferty; three sisters, Caron Robertson, Christine Anderson, and Colleen Stowell; a brother, Stephen Rafferty and several nieces and nephews. His mother, Eileen, passed in 1999.

Mick also leaves and enjoyed great relationships with his father-in-law, Jack Kelly; his mother-in-law, Elaine Kelly; his sister-in-law, Rose Kelly Pond and his two brothers-in-law, Timothy Kelly and Patrick Kelly.

The funeral will be held Tuesday, June 10, 2008 at 11:00 a.m. in St. Edward the Confessor Church, 10 Church St. Calling hours are Monday from 5-8 p.m. Burial is private. Brandon Funeral Home, 305 Wanoosnoc Rd., Fitchburg is directing arrangements.
Subject: Support Our PAC Fund.


Author:
DDD
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 20:10:53 06/17/07 Sun

Do some good sign on to join the PAC fund. This is how things get done here.
Replies:
Subject: Bye Bye Romney you piece of shit.


Author:
thank god
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 10:59:43 02/09/08 Sat

Replies:
Subject: DO SOMETHING


Author:
rep
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 17:03:52 02/02/08 Sat

JOIN JOHN MCCAIN
for a
CAMPAIGN RALLY



MONDAY 9:00AM

Faneuil Hall

Faneuil Hall Square

Boston, MA
Replies:
Subject: Good for yous


Author:
DDD
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 09:46:38 01/28/08 Mon

RALPH WHITE IS RE-ELECTED TO THE RETIREMENT BOARD

Incumbent Ralph White was re-elected to the Retirement Board. He fills one of the two elected positions of the five-member Board.
Subject: Merry Chrstmas


Author:
Massmoderators
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 08:18:10 12/23/07 Sun

We moderators want to take a moment to thank all the working men and women in the DOC for what they do for society. You are very much needed and very much underappreciated. Keep your perspective when you open presents with your kids and/or families. Remember some are not so fortunate as you. Some people are without the means to provide for their families, some have no families to provide for. Be grateful for what you have. The new year will be challenging for officers. Regardless, we as moderators stand with you and wish you all a Merry Christmas and a happy New Year!
Subject: Have you ever received a speeding ticket in Massachusetts? It may have been ILLEGAL


Author:
Fed Up
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 14:48:17 11/01/07 Thu

Have you have ever received a speeding ticket? Did you know many speed limits in Massachusetts are ILLEAGL? You read it right, many speed limit signs are posted illegally under Massachusetts law and police and legislatures are well aware of it. Not only are they aware of it, they use the illegal speed limits to generate revenue off of state tax-payers backs like you.

Here is a true story example;

In August of 2007 a 17 year old male and a friend were leaving the Greendale Mall in Worcester, Ma. The road being traveled was a two lane road in both directions, and the individual mentioned above was going up a slight incline. Thinking the road was an on ramp to route I-190, the individual began to accelerate so as to enter the highway at or close to the speed of flowing traffic (that’s what was taught in driving school). Just before he crested the hill he noticed a 35 MPH speed limit sign, so he began to slow down. Seconds later, as he looked down the hill, he noticed police cruisers with officers standing outside the vehicles signaling drivers to pull over. He pulled over and was told that he was clocked by radar going 51 MPH in a 35 MPH zone, and received a ticket totaling $160.00. The individual, believing a police officer’s word would be taken over his paid the fine.

Approximately 1 month later the 17 year old junior operator received notification in the mail that he would be losing his license for 90 days under the new Massachusetts Junior Operator Law.

In order to get his license back, the young, man has to take a road rage class (which he must pay to attend), an attitude adjustment class (which he must pay to attend), pay a $500.00 reinstatement fee, re-take the written driving test and the road test (both of which must be paid for), and of course the rise in insurance premiums. To add insult to injury the loss of license was appealed (after paying a $50.00 appeal fee) and quickly rejected.

Knowing all this, it’s easy to say, “Well, he broke the law.” That’s what he thought too, but hours of research proved differently. Here is the condensed version…

Speed limits are set in accordance with MGL Chapter 85 Section 2. An engineering study MUST be conducted along with other factors. If a speed limit is posted without this procedure, it is in violation of Chapter 90, Section 18, and is therefore considered illegal and unenforceable.

If a speed limit is not posted in accordance with Chapter 90 Section 18 it then falls under MGL Chapter 90 Section 17 which states… Massachusetts General Laws Chapter 90, Section 17 governs the speed of motor vehicles on unposted roadways. The speed limits on roadways that fall into this category are often referred to as ``prima facie'' speed limits. The present prima facie speed limits according to Chapter 90, Section 17 are condensed below:
....it shall be prima facie evidence of a rate of speed greater than is reasonable and proper if a motor vehicle is operated in excess of
1. 50 miles per hour on a divided highway outside of a thickly settled or business district for a distance of 1/4 of a mile.
2. 40 miles per hour on an undivided highway outside of a thickly settled or business district for a distance of 1/4 of a mile.
3. 30 miles per hour in a thickly settled or business district for a distance of 1/8 of a mile.
4. 20 miles per hour in a legally established school zone.
Note the distance requirements associated with the enforcement of Chapter 90, Section 17. Instantaneous radar or laser readings are not adequate. The motor vehicle must be shown to have been in excess of these speed limits for the entire distance associated with each respective speed limit. Also the prima facie speed limits cannot be posted, with the exception of a legally established school zone.
The road where the young man was ticketed is illegally posted (this is known due to a request for information that was done), therefore, it falls under MGL ch 90 sec 17. Being that the road was in a business district the speed limit is 50MPH. Remember, he was allegedly clocked going 51 MPH. What officer would write a ticket for 1 MPH over the limit? Besides, in Massachusetts we have “presumed” speed limits. Under the law it is legal to travel over the posted speed limit if the speed you are traveling is reasonable and safe to do so under the existing circumstances.
So you see if you break the law you will be punished. If the police, legislature, or other officials break the law, you will be punished. Where is the justice in all of this?
If you want more information because you think you may have been wrongfully ticked, or you just want to be educated for future reference, answer this post by simply typing “more info wanted” in the name (required) space.
Replies:
Subject: Just for your Information


Author:
Taken from the National Motorists Association web site
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 06:41:56 11/13/07 Tue

Where Does Your Three Dollars Per Gallon Really Go?
No one likes paying $35 for a fill-up that used to cost $15. But where does all your dinero go, actually? Is it Big Oil — or Big Government — that’s got you over a barrel?
Let’s break it down.
Crude Oil
Believe it or not, the cost of the oil itself is pretty low, roughly about 50 cents of the current per-gallon retail price of fuel. Even though world demand for oil continues to uptick steadily (and geometrically), the oil producing countries have kept pace - opening the spigots all the way. There appears to be plenty of oil, actually.
It’s mostly market volatility (which is based to a great extent on the social/political volatility of the situation in oil-producing areas and countries like Iraq and Venezuela) and artificial decreases in production by OPEC states that causes the world price of a gallon of crude to fluctuate like a haywire Geiger counter.
Who to blame? Unstable government, radical regimes; market manipulators, current events.
Refining/Distribution Costs
This is the big one, bottom-line wise. Around 50-75 cents of what you’re paying per gallon at the pump (depending on where you live/the time of year) goes to offset the cost of turning light sweet crude into something that will burn in your car’s engine. And burn cleanly, it’s important to add.
There are multiple (and varying) requirements for retail gasoline - including that it be "oxygenated" or "reformulated" in some areas (and at certain times of the year) as a means of curbing vehicle exhaust emissions. This is not cheap. In fact, the add-on costs of complying with federal and state motor fuels requirements have increased massively over the past 20 years.
It is often necessary, for example, to brew one type of fuel for one state - and a slightly different one for an adjacent state. These fuels must then be transported separately, via dedicated pipelines or trucks. That gets into bucks, fast. Also, refiners must guesstimate how much of a given type of gas to produce; if demand ends up exceeding supply, the price goes up.
Who to blame? Your federal and state lawmakers; excessive bureaucracy, conflicting/counterproductive regulations; air pollution.
Motor Fuels Taxes
This one’s beefy, too. Depending on where you live, you’re paying another 50 cents (or more) in federal, state and local motor fuels taxes on every gallon you burn.
The good news: As the total price of a gallon of regular unleaded shot up from around $1.50 just a few years ago to $3 or more today, the relative cost of motor fuels taxes has gone down. They used to account for about a third of the total price we paid; that’s now down to about a fourth. Feel better now?
Who to blame? The government, at all levels.
Oil Company Profits
In a word, huge. About 75 cents to $1 out of the $3 something you are paying at the pump - depending on whose numbers you use (or believe). This accounts for the record profits we’ve all read about. However, there is a caveat here - and it is "net" vs. "gross" profits.
While there’s no question the oil companies have been raking it in lately, there is a question as to just how much is actually left over after taking into account operating expenses and other things (including massive CEO pay packages) that detract from the bottom line. The true number is hard to gauge. But rest assured, it’s not small.
Who to blame? The oil companies. They have something you not only want but pretty much must have. You’ll pay what they say - like it or not.
Small Stuff
The remaining chump change (about 10-15 cents per gallon) goes to pay for things like credit card fees, mark-up/profit for the individual gas station dealer (he has to make money, too) and so on. Trying to make a buck selling gas on the retail level is actually a very tough proposition.
Your local gas n’ go very likely makes more money on its mini-mart than it does on the fuel it sells - so don’t get mad at him when the gas you bought yesterday for $3.10 is selling for $3.29 on Saturday morning. He’s probably feeling just as screwed as you.
Who to blame? No one. We’re in this one together.
Replies:
Subject: basic rights


Author:
HITLOD
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 16:51:01 11/10/07 Sat

Dear fellow Brothers and Sisters of the MA DOC and HOC,

This is to inform you of the formation of the “Hurt In The Line Of Duty” (HITLOD) support group. HITLOD was created out of the dyer need to learn and share information about the I.A. system, your Healthcare treatment and your over all Rights. HITLOD was created by and for those who are affected by it. We are mostly Unit 4 members and we’re not asking for handouts BUT we do need and want your support.
* You can help by signing up on our emailing list and pass this message on.

The following are some basic RIGHTS and first steps to take when HURT IN THE LINE OF DUTY…
*If you were injured in the line of duty seek medical help for real serious injuries get to an ER for treatment and if able let your Boss and Union know you got hurt a.s.a.p..
* No matter who first helps you medically follow up immediately with your Primary Care Physician (PCP). Explain exactly what happen and list all of your injuries no matter how trivial.
*Most important do not let your PCP farm you out to any outside overall healthcare providers i.e. a workman’s comp clinics also known as “occupational health clinics” of any type without a clear understanding of your Rights.
*The only healthcare providers you should be seeing outside your PCP are specialists referred by your PCP for your specific injuries and or those you choose to see. Note; you could be ordered by the boss/system to see their doctors but you still have rights.

Sincerely,
HITLOD
Turnkeyer@aol.com
Subject: How sad of a day is it now Tony Dungy !


Author:
Copied from http://wbztv.com/homepage
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 16:15:47 11/05/07 Mon



Report: Colts Accused Of Cheating Against Patriots
(WBZ) BOSTON Here’s a strange twist: According to a Yahoo.com report the Colts are being investigated for cheating in their game against the New England Patriots.

Jason Cole of Yahoo reports that Patriots are accusing the Colts of piping in crowd noise during Sunday’s game In Indianapolis. A game the Patriots won 24 to 20.

Cole’s article quotes NFL spokesman Greg Aiello as saying: "We’re aware of it and we’re looking into it. It may just be the TV feed from CBS, but we’re checking it out."

Cole points out that some people watching the much hyped game said there seemed to be a "skip" in sound, and that this might confirm that the Colts play loud crowd noise in an effort to distract opponents while the opposing team is on offense.

The Yahoo article says that Patriots President, Jonathan Kraft complained about it after the game to the league’s Vice President of Security, Milt Ahlerich. Ironically Alerich is the very same person who confiscated the videotape the Patriots made during a game earlier this season against the New York Jets. The team was accused of stealing signals made by the Jets coaches.

The NFL eventually fined the Patriots and docked them a first round draft pick for the offense. It also drew criticism from many people across sports, including the NFL.

Colts Coach, Tony Dungy called the Patriots spying scandal was a "sad day for the league" and likened the Patriots to Barry Bonds. Something Patriots Coach, Bill Belichick must have had in mind during the coaches far from cordial handshake after Sunday’s game.

This is the latest in a long line of animosity between the two bitter rivals. In the past Colts G.M., Bill Polian has complained that the Patriots have repeated bent the rules. Polian has also reportedly been explosive in the press box at Gillette Stadium, including a disturbing outburst during a Colts 40 to 21 win in 2006. Fox Sports quoted Polian as yelling "Break his leg!" as former Patriots Quarterback, Doug Flutie scrambled around during the last play of the game.

The Colts have long been suspected of piping in fake crowd noise as a home field advantage, but now the NFL is investigating. Cole quotes Aiello as saying "We’re aware of the accusations, but there has never been anything to substantiate it."

After the game, Patriots Quarterback Tom Brady was not directly asked whether the Colts cheated but did comment on the noise at the RCA Dome. Brady said: "The crowd noise is... I don’t know if there’s a levels of being deaf, but we couldn’t hear anything, and you really couldn’t hear anything at certain times, so we pretty much went exclusively with the wrist band, which is a challenge too."

According to the Yahoo.com article, a Patriots spokesman said Monday that the team plans no formal protest to the league.

Click on this link and scroll to the 2:25 time code in this to hear what appears to sound like some sort of skip in the audio.
Replies:
Subject: e-board supporting David Sullivan for mayor?


Author:
Lifer
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 18:15:09 10/25/07 Thu

How in the world can the e-board support David Sullivan for mayor of Fall River after Tom Finnernan made him flip his vote on the death penalty?
Dave Sullivan is a do nothing, flip flopping and spineless state rep. which our union should stay away from supporting him for any elected office.
You people on the e-board should get your priorities in order and do some homework before backing someone like this character. This guy has done nothing for the southeastern mass. area as a state rep and I wouldn't vote him in as animal control officer let alone any other state or municipal position. I am fully aware of this mans' voting history,his special interest groups and perks he's been receiving since elected

One Who Knows
Replies:
Subject: Thank you Mr. Ralph White. reposted from www.massretirees.com


Author:
co in the no
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 22:30:37 10/22/07 Mon

repost from www.massretirees.com




STATE RETIREMENT BOARD ELECTION
Ballots will shortly be sent to all members of the State Retirement System for a very important election.

Association President Ralph White is running for re-election to a new three-year term as one of the two elected members of the State Retirement Board. The second elected seat is currently being held by Theresa McGoldrick. Her term will not expire this year.

Ralph White, the senior member of the Board, wishes to remind all retired state employees of the importance of this election. He is the only state retiree on the five-member Board. The following statement is from Mr. White:

“Retirees need an experienced member on the Board upon whom they can count to look out for their best interests and those of their survivors, someone who will fight on their behalf, both at the Retirement Board and at the Legislature.

“There are seven candidates in this case. In a random pick for ballot position, I am fifth. You will see the word incumbent next to my name. Do not take this election for granted. Please take the time to return your ballot as instructed so that it will be registered and be counted. Your vote is very important to all retirees even though they may belong to one of our other retirement systems.

“I have devoted my life to you and all public retirees of this state. All I ask is that you, as a member of the State Retirement System, spend $0.41 (postage stamp) so that I can continue to represent you at the State Retirement Board and in turn continue to lead our crusade for members and survivors of the Commonwealth’s retirement systems.”

Thank you very much.

Ralph White

Note to active state employees: “While I am a retired state employee, I also represent you on the State Retirement Board. Theresa McGoldrick, my counterpart, who is the other elected member on the Board, works with me as a team. She does an excellent job on behalf of the members of our system. You, as well as our retirees, can reach me at 617-723-7283 at anytime if you have a pension question or problem. I would greatly appreciate your vote. Check with your agency or department office for ballots.”

Thank you,

Ralph White
Subject: ITS NOT JUST US., IT'S ALL OF THE MIDDLE CLASS


Author:
I BELIEVE THE GOP HAS GIVEN RISE TO A NEW UNION MOVEMENT
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 10:55:24 05/27/07 Sun


Read more from President Sweeney.


Maybe the loudest message from the recent congressional election was that regular folks have had enough and are ready to take back economic power from the corporate elite and radical right wing.



Working America has seen wages stagnate, costs soar and wealth and privilege become more concentrated in the hands of fewer and fewer people. This has not been an accident. The pro-corporate and anti-union policies of the Bush administration and its congressional rubber-stampers have deliberately favored the wealthy and corporate interests over working people.



The new Congress has many opportunities to right these wrongs. I believe the most important step the new Congress can take to rebuild the beleaguered middle class is to pass the Employee Free Choice Act. This law would repair the hopelessly broken system that is supposed to ensure workers’ freedom to form unions.



It’s no accident that the 25-year decline in workers’ wages in our country has paralleled a 25-year slide in the size and strength of America’s union movement. Unions are the surest way for workers to protect themselves against corporate greed and lift their families up into higher standards of living. Unions and our members are also the great leveling power in our capitalist economy, ensuring that money doesn’t flow too fast to the rich and leave the rest of us with nothing to spend or invest or save.



But for the last quarter century, unions and working people have been under relentless attack. Employers and the politicians they control have been waging an all-out war against workers who simply try to exercise their right to form the unions they want representing them. Worker after worker after worker is fired for trying to form unions—like Ed Martin, a former Comcast service technician in Beaver Falls, Pa., and John Summerhour, a former baggage screener at Jackson-Hartsfield Airport in Atlanta. Worker after worker waits years for the benefits of union membership—like registered nurse Lori Gay and her colleagues at Salt Lake Regional Medical Center in Salt Lake City who have been waiting for four years for the ballots to be counted from their union election.



The struggles of Ed and John and Lori are not aberrations. These violations of basic human rights take place every day in our country. In America, we don’t enslave, torture or murder workers as they do in Burma, Zimbabwe, Colombia, Russia and China. We’re much more subtle: We enslave dreams, torture hopes and clamp the iron shackles of poverty around the ankles of workers so they can’t climb any higher on the economic ladder. It is the shame of our nation—and it’s an international disgrace.



The Employee Free Choice Act won’t instantly end the war on working families. But it will make it harder for employers to interfere with the basic rights valued by every person in America: Freedom of speech. Freedom of association and assembly. Freedom to join or form unions. The Employee Free Choice Act won’t guarantee a high-wage economy or automatically close our wage and wealth gap. But it will give more workers a chance to become union members with the kind of wages and health care and pensions they deserve. It will help build stronger communities. It will help create a more balanced economy. And it will give working families a level playing field so we can further strengthen the progressive movement that is so important to the political balance in our country.



The fight to enact the Employee Free Choice Act belongs to all of us. It’s a fight for our rights, our economic security and our future. We are taking it to Capitol Hill, where the newly elected majority party actually supports our cause, and to the streets and worksites of America to lobby from the grassroots.



We will win this struggle the same way we won back the House and Senate—by the power of our purpose, the clarity of our conviction and the strength of our solidarity.
Replies:
Subject: How About Them Bush Folk's???


Author:
Just keeps getting better!
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 21:07:01 04/30/07 Mon

Corps asked to explain pump contract

When the Army Corps of Engineers solicited bids for drainage pumps for New Orleans, it copied the specifications — typos and all — from the catalog of the manufacturer that ultimately won the $32 million contract, a review of documents by The Associated Press found.

The pumps, supplied by Moving Water Industries Corp. of Deerfield Beach, Fla., and installed at canals before the start of the 2006 hurricane season, proved to be defective, as the AP reported in March. The matter is under investigation by the Government Accountability Office, the investigative arm of Congress.

In a letter dated April 13, Sen. David Vitter (news, bio, voting record), R-La., called on the Corps to look into how the politically connected company got the post-Hurricane Katrina contract. MWI employed former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush, President Bush's brother, to market its pumps during the 1980s, and top MWI officials have been major contributors to the Republican Party.

While it may not be a violation of federal regulations to adopt a company's technical specifications, it is frowned on, especially for large jobs like the MWI contract, because it could give the impression the job was rigged for the benefit of a certain company, contractors familiar with Corps practices say.

The Corps' January 2006 call for bids for 34 pumps used the wording on how the pumps should be built and tested, with minor changes, found in MWI catalogs.

The specifications were so similar that an erroneous phrase in MWI catalogs — "the discharge tube and head assembly shall be abrasive resistance steel" — also appears in the Corps specifications. The phrase should say "abrasion resistant steel." An incorrect reference to the type of steel that would be required apparently was also lifted.

Eugene Pawlik, a Corps spokesman in Washington, said the agency is working on a response to Vitter's letter.

MWI declined to discuss how it won the contract. GAO would not talk about its probe.

Richard White, a federal contracting expert, said it is "not unheard for a spec to be copied, in particular in cases of emergency purchases."

"It's not a good practice, but it's not anything egregious, especially if the Corps allowed other companies to negotiate to change it," White said.

After Katrina swamped about 80 percent of the city, Congress appropriated $5.7 billion to rebuild New Orleans' flood protection systems. Vitter and Sen. Mary Landrieu (news, bio, voting record), D-La., have excoriated the Corps over its workmanship since Katrina.

In his letter to the commander of the Corps, Vitter said the bid solicitation for the pumps "includes specifications identical to those written and marketed by Moving Water Industries." In addition, "the testing specifications are also identical to the testing specifications developed and authored by MWI."

A May 2006 memo by a Corps inspector working on the project, provided to the AP earlier this year, warned that the pumps were faulty and would not work if needed to remove water during a hurricane. GAO opened its investigation after the memo surfaced.

The Corps and MWI insist the pumps would have worked, but last year's mild hurricane season never put them to the test. The pumps have been overhauled and are being reinstalled.

The Corps withheld about 20 percent of MWI's contract price — including an incentive of about $5 million to deliver them by June 1, 2006 — until the flaws have been resolved. But the Corps also spent $4.5 million for six additional MWI pumps for use in troubleshooting the defective ones.

The Corps contract officer overseeing the January 2006 bid, Cindy Nicholas, was told about the copied specifications during a conference call with FPI Inc., a Florida company that also bid on the project, shortly after MWI was awarded the contract. A recording of the briefing was provided to the AP by FPI.

"Are you folks aware that the specifications that you folks put out was a copy of the specifications in the MWI catalog?" asked Bob Purcell, who was an FPI salesman at the time the bids were taken.

"No, I'm not aware of that," Nicholas replied.

Corps official Dan Bradley said during the briefing that consulting engineers had a hand in drawing up the specifications.

Purcell then complained: "We were forced to meet someone else's specifications in entirety." He said the consultants did not cooperate with FPI, and he charged that MWI was given "a head's up" about the job. That, he said, was evident by MWI's order for pump engines before the contract was even put out to bid.

"I don't know anything about that, sir," Nicholas responded. She said that if MWI ordered the engines ahead of time, "they took a big risk."

"Obviously it was a risk that paid off, let's put it that way. They must have had some assurance!" Purcell exclaimed.

"Not from me," Nicholas said.

MWI would not comment on the alleged order for pump engines before the award of the contract.

Purcell, a former MWI employee, is a plaintiff in a federal whistleblower lawsuit accusing MWI of fraudulently helping Nigeria obtain $74 million in taxpayer-backed loans for overpriced and unnecessary pumping equipment. The U.S. Justice Department has joined the suit as a plaintiff.
Replies:
Subject: BUSH STILL HIDING


Author:
Impeach this moron!
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 14:47:40 07/09/07 Mon


Bush denies Congress access to aides
By LAURIE KELLMAN, Associated Press Writer 25 minutes ago
WASHINGTON - President Bush invoked executive privilege Monday to deny requests by Congress for testimony from two former aides about the firings of federal prosecutors.

ADVERTISEMENT

The White House, however, did offer again to make former counsel Harriet Miers and one-time political director Sara Taylor available for private, off-the-record interviews.

In a letter to the heads of the House and Senate Judiciary panels, White House counsel Fred Fielding insisted that Bush was acting in good faith and refused lawmakers' demand that the president explain the basis for invoking the privilege.

"You may be assured that the president's assertion here comports with prior practices in similar contexts, and that it has been appropriately documented," the letter said.

Retorted House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers:

"Contrary what the White House may believe, it is the Congress and the courts that will decide whether an invocation of executive privilege is valid, not the White House unilaterally," the Michigan Democrat said in a statement.

The exchange Monday was the latest step in a slow-motion legal waltz between the White House and lawmakers toward eventual contempt-of-Congress citations. If neither side yields, the matter could land in federal court.

In his letter regarding subpoenas the Judiciary panels issued, Fielding said, "The president feels compelled to assert executive privilege with respect to the testimony sought from Sara M. Taylor and Harriet E. Miers."

Fielding was responding to a 10 a.m. EDT deadline set by the Democratic chairmen, Sen. Patrick Leahy of Vermont and Conyers, for the White House to explain it's privilege claim, prove that the president personally invoked it and provide logs of which documents were being withheld.

As expected, Fielding refused to comply. He said he was acting at Bush's direction, and he complained that the committees had decided to enforce the subpoenas whether or not the White House complied.

"The committees have already prejudged the question, regardless of the production of any privilege log," Fielding wrote. "In such circumstances, we will not be undertaking such a project, even as a further accommodation."

Leahy also questioned the explanation.

"I have to wonder if the White House's refusal to provide a detailed basis for this executive privilege claim has more to do with its inability to craft an effective one," he said in a statement.

The privilege claim on testimony by former aides won't necessarily prevent them from appearing under oath this week, as scheduled.

Leahy said that he expected Taylor, Bush's former political director, to testify as scheduled before the Senate panel on Wednesday. Fielding tried to head off any possibility that she would tell the story the president believes is protected under the privilege.

"I respectfully request that you inform Ms. Taylor that the president has directed her not to provide this testimony," Fielding wrote in a letter Monday to Neil Eggleston, her lawyer. Eggleston did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

But Taylor was included on e-mails about the firings released earlier this year by the Justice Department, and Leahy believes she could answer questions about those and other matters. She also sent potentially thousands of e-mails on a Republican National Committee account outside the White House. Leahy said those communications are are not covered by executive privilege.

The House Judiciary Committee scheduled Miers' testimony for Thursday, but it was unclear whether she would appear, according to congressional aides speaking on condition of anonymity because negotiations were under way.

The probe into the U.S. attorney firings was only one of several Democratic-led investigations of the White House and its use of executive power spanning the war in Iraq, Bush's secretive wiretapping program and his commutation last week of I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby's prison sentence.

Fielding's letter welcomed lawmakers back to town with a clear indication that relations between Congress and the White House had soured during the break.

Bush's counsel cloaked his tough rejoinder to the Democratic committee chairmen in gentlemanly language, but his message was unequivocal: the White House won't back down, and believes the congressional legal argument to be far weaker than its own and its attitude less appealing.

Fielding dismissed the chairmen's attempt to "direct" the White House to provide the legal underpinning of Bush's executive privilege claims and a detailed listing of the documents he is withholding. He said the White House already has provided its legal argument and so does not need to do so again — and won't.

"We are aware of no authority by which a congressional committee may `direct' the Executive to undertake the task of creating and providing an extensive description of every document covered by an assertion of Executive Privilege," he wrote. Fielding suggested that asserting executive privilege on the testimony comes as a result of this impasse and the lack of good faith it demonstrates on the part of Congress.

More broadly, Fielding suggested that the congressional inquiry into the entire matter of the U.S. attorneys' dismissals has no constitutional basis, in large part because the president has sole authority to hire and fire federal prosecutors.

"Although we each speak on behalf of different branches of government, and perhaps for that reason cannot help having different perspectives on the matter, it is hoped you will agree, upon further reflection, that it is incorrect to say that the President's assertion of executive privilege was performed without `good faith,' " Fielding's letter said.
Replies:
Subject: Impeach Bush and Cheney!


Author:
Statesman
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 11:26:19 07/14/07 Sat


This is not a partisan issue. Impeachment is necessary to resolve the constitutional crisis this admistration has created! For the sake of limiting the power of this and future administrations please support impeachment!

www.bcimpeach.com

www.impeachcheney.org
Replies:
Subject: Bush and Cheney Should Be Locked Up!


Author:
What are they hiding from!
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 10:56:58 06/28/07 Thu


Bush won't supply subpoenaed documents


WASHINGTON - President Bush, moving toward a constitutional showdown with Congress, asserted executive privilege Thursday and rejected lawmakers' demands for documents that could shed light on the firings of federal prosecutors.

Bush's attorney told Congress the White House would not turn over subpoenaed documents for former presidential counsel Harriet Miers and former political director Sara Taylor.

In reaction, Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy accused the administration of shifting "into Nixonian stonewalling" and revealing "disdain for our system of checks and balances."

"With respect, it is with much regret that we are forced down this unfortunate path which we sought to avoid by finding grounds for mutual accommodation," White House counsel Fred Fielding said in a letter to Leahy and the chairman of the House Judiciary Committee. "We had hoped this matter could conclude with your committees receiving information in lieu of having to invoke executive privilege. Instead, we are at this conclusion."

Thursday was the deadline for surrendering the documents. The White House also made clear that Miers and Taylor would not testify next month, as directed by the subpoenas, which were issued June 13. The stalemate could end up with House and Senate contempt citations and a battle in federal court over separation of powers.

"Increasingly, the president and vice president feel they are above the law," said Leahy, D-Vt., after getting the news from Fielding in an early-morning phone call. "In America no one is above law."

In his letter, Fielding said Bush had "attempted to chart a course of cooperation" by releasing more than 8,500 pages of documents and sending Gonzales and other senior officials to testify before Congress. The White House also had offered a compromise in which Miers, Taylor, White House political strategist Karl Rove and their deputies would be interviewed by Judiciary Committee aides in closed-door sessions, without transcripts. Democrats Patrick Leahy of Vermont and John Conyers of Michigan, the chairs of the Senate and House Judiciary Committees, have rejected that offer.

On the other hand, Fielding said Bush "was not willing to provide your committees with documents revealing internal White House communications or to accede to your desire for senior advisors to testify at public hearings.

"The reason for these distinctions rests upon a bedrock presidential prerogative: for the President to perform his constitutional duties, it is imperative that he receive candid and unfettered advice and that free and open discussions and deliberations occur among his advisors and between those advisors and others within and outside the Executive Branch," Fielding said.

"The doctrine of executive privilege exists, at least in part, to protect such communications from compelled disclosure to Congress, especially where, as here, the president's interests in maintaining confidentiality far outweigh Congress's interests in obtaining deliberative White House communications," Fielding said.

"Further, it remains unclear precisely how and why your committees are unable to fulfill your legislative and oversight interests without the unfettered requests you have made in your subpoenas," Fielding said. "Put differently, there is no demonstration that the documents and information you seek by subpoena are critically important to any legislative initiatives that you may be pursuing or intending to pursue."

It was the second time in his administration that Bush has exerted executive privilege, said White House deputy press secretary Tony Fratto. The first instance was in December, 2001, to rebuff Congress' demands for Clinton administration documents.

Tensions between the administration and the Democratic-run Congress have been building for months as the House and Senate Judiciary panels have sought to probe the firings of eight federal prosecutors and the administration's program of warrantless eavesdropping. The investigations are part of the Democrats' efforts to hold the administration to account for the way it has conducted the war on terrorism since the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks.

Democrats say the firings of the prosecutors over the winter was an example of improper political influence. The White House says U.S. attorneys are political appointees who can be hired and fired for almost any reason.

Democrats and even some key Republicans have said that Attorney General Alberto Gonzales should resign over the U.S. attorney dismissals, but he has steadfastly held his ground and Bush has backed him.

Just Wednesday, the Senate Judiciary Committee subpoenaed the White House and Vice President Dick Cheney's office, demanding documents pertaining to terrorism-era warrant-free eavesdropping.

Separately, that panel also is summoning Gonzales to discuss the program and an array of other matters — including the prosecutor firings — that have cost a half-dozen top Justice Department officials their jobs.

The Judiciary panels also subpoenaed the National Security Council. Leahy added that, like House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers, D-Mich., he would consider pursuing contempt citations against those who refuse.
Replies:
Subject: Here's why I never have and never will vote for Romney


Author:
Semper Fi
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 14:29:37 08/08/07 Wed

Romney Speaks Up for Sons' Decisions
By GLEN JOHNSON, Associated Press Writer
1 hour ago

BETTENDORF, Iowa - Republican presidential hopeful Mitt Romney on Wednesday defended his five sons' decision not to enlist in the military, saying they're showing their support for the country by "helping me get elected."

Romney, who did not serve in Vietnam due to his Mormon missionary work and a high draft lottery number, was asked the question by an anti-war activist after a speech in which he called for "a surge of support" for U.S. forces in Iraq.

Romney, the former Massachusetts governor, also saluted a uniformed soldier in the crowd and called for donations to military support organizations. Last week, he donated $25,000 to seven such organizations.

"The good news is that we have a volunteer Army and that's the way we're going to keep it," Romney told some 200 people gathered in an abbey near the Mississippi River that had been converted into a hotel. "My sons are all adults and they've made decisions about their careers and they've chosen not to serve in the military and active duty and I respect their decision in that regard."

He added: "One of the ways my sons are showing support for our nation is helping me get elected because they think I'd be a great president."

Romney's five sons range in age from 37 to 26 and have worked as real estate developers, sports marketers and advertising executives. They are now actively campaigning for their father and have a "Five Brothers" blog on Romney's campaign Web site.

Romney noted that his middle son, 36-year-old Josh, was completing a recreational vehicle tour of all 99 Iowa counties on Wednesday and said, "I respect that and respect all those and the way they serve this great country."

The woman who asked the question, Rachel Griffiths, 41, of Milan, Ill., identified herself as a member of Quad City Progressive Action for the Common Good, as well as the sister of an Army major who had served in Iraq.

"Of course not," Griffiths said when asked if she was satisfied with Romney's answer. "He told me the way his son shows support for our military and our nation is to buy a Winnebago and ride across Iowa and help him get elected."

The town-hall-style meeting was the first of eight events scheduled for Romney just three days before the Iowa Straw Poll, a nonbinding beauty contest among the Republican presidential contenders.

In the days leading up it, Romney is airing a new television ad in the state in which he encourages supporters to attend the event, portrays himself as an outsider to Washington and takes swipes at both Republicans and Democrats there.

"Washington politicians in both parties have proven they can't control spending, and they won't control our borders," Romney says in the ad. "I will, but I need your help to do it."

While former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani, Arizona Sen. John McCain and former Tennessee Sen. Fred Thompson, who is considering a campaign are not participating, Romney has been actively organizing with the aim of gaining momentum into January's Iowa caucuses, which kick off the presidential nominating process.
Replies:
Subject: John McCain 2008


Author:
John McCain 2008 fan from SBCC
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 12:49:26 09/27/07 Thu

Any John McCain 2008 fans here?
Replies:
Subject: Pay out = more pay


Author:
3D
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 12:45:44 09/27/07 Thu

Contributions are not deductible as charitable contributions for federal income tax purposes. Federal Election Law requires us to report the name, address, occupation, and employer for contributions aggregating in excess of $200 in an election cycle. The maximum an individual may contribute is $2,300 for the primary election and an additional $2,300 for the general election. Couples may contribute $4,600 for the primary and general elections, respectively. Federal PACs may contribute $5,000 for each election. Contributions from corporations, labor unions, federal government contractors, national banks, and foreign nationals without permanent residency status are prohibited.
Subject: This is what this board is for


Author:
Concerned
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 16:58:51 09/24/07 Mon

2 Texas Inmates Escape; Officer Killed
By MICHAEL GRACZYK, Associated Press Writer
3 hours ago

HUNTSVILLE, Texas - Two inmates working in prison field overpowered a guard Monday and ran her over in a stolen pickup truck, killing the woman as they fled, prison officials said.

One inmate was apprehended within an hour, and a manhunt was under way in Huntsville for the second. Stetson-hatted lawmen on horseback could be seen in the nearby fields with bloodhounds checking in the brush.

The missing inmate, Jerry Martin, 37, had been imprisoned since 1997 and was serving a 50-year sentence for attempted murder.

Martin and John Ray Falk, 40, were working outside the Wynne Unit of the Texas Department of Criminal Justice just north of Huntsville Monday morning. They overpowered the officer about 10:30 a.m. in the field along Interstate 45, took her weapons and stole a Huntsville city truck that was nearby, department spokesman Jason Clark said.

"They ran over the officer," Clark said. "We can confirm she did die."

The name of the officer was not immediately released.

Falk, who had been serving a life sentence since 1986 for murder, was caught. Martin remained at large.

"At some point, and this is where it gets sketchy, they ditched the truck," Clark said.

Martin is believed to have run into a wooded area along I-45 about a mile or two south of where the officer was killed. At least one shotgun the officer was carrying had not been accounted for, agency spokeswoman Michelle Lyons said.

Based on his good disciplinary record in prison, Martin was classified as a minimum security inmate and assigned to do field work outside the prison under the supervision of officers.

"In this case, obviously, something went wrong," Lyons said.

Authorities in Utah were also searching for a pair of fugitives Monday after two convicted killers escaped from a county jail near the Utah-Wyoming border.

Danny Martin Gallegos, 49, and Juan Carlos Diaz-Arevelo, 27, escaped Sunday after jumping the fence at the Daggett County jail, about 120 miles east of Salt Lake City, said Jack Ford, a spokesman for the Utah Department of Corrections. He said the men were discovered missing during an inmate count at 8 p.m. _ six hours after they were last seen at the jail.

"Both men are considered dangerous. Do not approach," the sheriff's office said in a statement.

Diaz-Arevelo was convicted of murder and child abuse in 2006. Gallegos was convicted of aggravated murder in 1991. Because of overcrowding, the two men had been transferred to the jail from the state prison, Ford said.

In north Georgia, another search was on for three inmates who escaped from the Fannin County Jail in Blue Ridge. The Georgia State Patrol was called to assist the search by air after the three escaped on Sunday.
Subject: New Instant Messages


Author:
Massmoderators
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 12:19:19 09/05/07 Wed

At lease one moderator on a daily basis will now be availabe for your questions and/or comments. We will be using Yahoo! messenger under the screen name massmoderators. This is a service we are trying in addition to the email option at the top of our webpages.

There may be rare occassions where you may have to wait a few days for a response but we will do our best to get back to you within 12-24 hours. If you find one of us online please feel free to say hello!

Best of luck to all. We look forward to developing closer relationships thoughout the department, as well as improving your Voy Forums experience.

Massmoderators
Subject: Time to ID the Rats and Traitors before they get away


Author:
True Blue
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 09:38:58 04/19/07 Thu

Now that the dirty bitches' ship has sunk all the shit bags are on the run.
We need to clean house our selves. Not the we wouldn't talk to them for awhile or lets kick them out of the Union bullshit. I mean run them the fuck out of town and make sure those motherfuckers don't get the 20/50.
They sucked dick and ass for many years in their slushy or frozen jobs and even becoming managers. Not all but most of them helped fuck you every step of the way.
Now its time to make them pay for their sins.
Replies:
Subject: unplugged


Author:
unplugged
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 16:53:22 08/04/07 Sat



http://www.politico.com/blogs/jonathanmartin/0807/Mitt_unplugged.html
Subject: Bush defends military buildup in Iraq


Author:
AP
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 11:27:51 07/04/07 Wed


MARTINSBURG, W.Va. - President Bush on Wednesday defended the U.S. military buildup in Iraq in a patriotic Fourth of July speech, saying victory will require "more patience, more courage and more sacrifice."


"However difficult the fight is in Iraq, we must win it," Bush said, telling members of the West Virginia Air National Guard that he admires the valor of America's fighting men and women but that now is no time to leave.

"We must succeed for our own sake. For the security of our citizens we must support our troops. We must support the Iraqi government and we must defeat al-Qaida in Iraq."

He defended the U.S.-led invasion in Iraq to a friendly audience that cheered the toppling of Saddam Hussein as well as Bush's decision in January to send 28,000 more U.S. troops to Iraq to try to tamp down on the violence and encourage the Iraqis to reach political agreements among Shiites, Sunnis and Kurds.

The offensive in Baghdad and areas to the north and south has boosted American casualties, although the number of bombings and shootings has fallen in the city in recent days.

"It's a tough fight, but I wouldn't have asked those troops to go into harm's way if the fight was not essential to the security of the United States of America," Bush said of the more than 4-year-old war that has claimed the lives of over 3,580 men and women of the U.S. military.

In Baghdad, the administration was highlighting a ceremony where more than 500 troops, who have fought in Iraq, re-enlisted in the U.S. armed forces and a hundred of their comrades raised their right hands to recite an oath making them citizens of the United States.

Difficulties remain, however; Sunnis, Shiites and Kurds said Wednesday that they have not been able to agree to a draft bill to regulate the country's oil industry — something U.S. officials hope will rally Sunni support for the government and reduce backing for insurgents. The oil bill is a top concern of Iraq's Sunni minority, which is centered in regions of the country with little proven reserves and fears that Shiites and Kurds in the oil-rich south and north will monopolize profits from the industry.

Bush thanked the servicemen and women serving abroad and their families, including children at the event who recited the Pledge of Allegiance with him. He read from a 1777 newspaper article about an Independence Day celebration in Philadelphia where people fired artillery, toasted democracy and watched fireworks that illuminated the sky.

"We're still celebrating, and rightly so," Bush said.

About 2,000 people, including members of the 167th Airlift Wing and their families were invited to the event.

On the other side of the state, West Virginia Patriots for Peace, who are critical of the Bush administration and its handling of the war, scheduled a protest against the president's invitation-only appearance at the 167th Airlift Wing.

"The Fourth is not going to go by with this guy coming in here and no voices coming back at him," said the Rev. Jim Lewis, a member of the group and a veteran activist.

"I was told it was a closed affair, that it was for the families and a few invited guests. They've iced us out," Lewis said. "The public needs to know that this is certainly an isolated event."

After the speech, Bush was returning to the White House to watch fireworks and celebrate his 61st birthday on Friday.

"I told her to fire up the grill," Bush said he told first lady Laura Bush, who did not attend.
Subject: Paris Hilton


Author:
Give me a break!
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 11:52:53 06/07/07 Thu


Paris Hilton Released to Her Home
THURSDAY JUNE 07, 2007 09:45 AM EDT
THURSDAY JUNE 07, 2007 10:25 AM EDT UPDATED
By Emily Fromm


Due to an undisclosed "medical condition," Paris Hilton has been reassigned from jail to her home, where she will wear an electronic monitoring device.

"She was not released, she was reassigned," Los Angeles County Sheriff's Dept. spokesperson Steve Whitmore said at a press conference Thursday.

He would not provide further details about the medical condition, citing privacy laws. He did not know if the condition was pre-existing, but said the decision was made after "extensive consultation" with medical personnel.

Whitmore said Hilton was released shortly after midnight on Thursday: "She was transported out of here by us, there was a transference to her attorney, and then she was taken home."

Hilton has been credited with five days of time served and will spend the remaining 40 days of her 45-day sentence confined to her home wearing an ankle bracelet with a range of 3,000-4,000 square feet.

Asked whether she would be confined completely, Whitmore said: "There's some fudge with that. If someone goes and gets their mail, if they're 30 minutes outside, that's okay. It's a complicated electronic situation."

Whitmore said the sheriff's department is not concerned with appearing to be soft on the celebrity inmate. "It doesn't matter how we look, really," he said. "We just hopefully do our job and do it professionally, with a sense of humanity."

TMZ.com reported Thursday morning that Hilton had been released early Thursday.

Hilton, 26, began her sentence Sunday night at the Century Regional Detention Facility in Lynwood, south of Los Angeles.

The heiress was sentenced to 45 days in jail for violating her probation by driving with a suspended license. Amid speculation that she would actually serve much less time due to prison overcrowding, police said she would spend at least 23 days behind bars.
Replies:
Subject: middlesex CO's highest paid in state


Author:
huh
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 16:07:32 06/21/07 Thu

Middlesex Correction Officers Association, NEPBA Local 500 Ratify New Two-Year Deal
New England PBA Negotiates Contract in Three Weeks

June 6, 2007 – The members of the Middlesex Correction Officers Association, NEPBA Local 500 overwhelmingly ratified a new two-year contract making them the highest paid correction officers in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. The former local of the International Brotherhood of Correctional Officers (IBPO) has been without a contract since June 30, 2006 and had filed a petition to decertify from the IBCO with the Massachusetts Labor Relations Commission on September 11, 2006. Although the leadership was unable to negotiate a deal with the High Sheriff of Middlesex County while the petition to decertify was pending, most are thankful for the wait and for the contract negotiation skills of the New England PBA.

When the election was completed, the IBCO was history and the difficult job of negotiating a new contact began. Less than three weeks ago, New England PBA President Bryan W. McMahon and New England PBA Executive Director Jerry Flynn met with Middlesex Sheriff James V. DiPaola and the Chief Legal Counsel John Granara of the Middlesex Sheriff’s Office to discuss the current expired contract. As the discussions progressed, the New England PBA and the leadership team of the Middlesex Correction Officers Association, NEPBA Local 500 negotiated a new contract in less than three weeks, something IBCO couldn’t do in three years!

NEPBA Chief Negotiator Jerry Flynn called the negotiations “very professional with an open and frank discussion of the issues.” Flynn stated, “None of this could have been accomplished without the full commitment of the Sheriff of Middlesex County and his staff.” He further stated, “Sheriff DiPaola should be commended for remaining true to his campaign promise of competitive salaries being his priority.”

New England PBA President Bryan W. McMahon called the contract “a great first step in introducing what we can do in providing quality representation to some of our newest members.”

Union President Rick Looney praised the New England PBA for their “professionalism and commitment” and stated, “This is the best contract we have ever received – without giving up or getting ZERO’s.”
Highlights of the contract include:

6% across the board raise over two years for all union members
Signing Bonus for all union members
Raised employer contribution level three dollars per week per member to cover dental and vision
6% across the board raise over two years for all union members. The New England PBA extends a warm “thank you” for the leadership support of people such as Rick Looney, Denise Cohen, Keith Sullivan and Curtis LeMay for all of their time, commitment and hard work. It’s a pleasure to work with such dedicated individuals and we look forward to a long and prosperous relationship. The membership of NEPBA Local 500 ratified the contract by a vote of 378 in favor to 12 opposed.

6% across the board raise over two years for all union members. The New England PBA extends a warm “thank you” for the leadership support of people such as Rick Looney, Denise Cohen, Keith Sullivan and Curtis LeMay for all of their time, commitment and hard work. It’s a pleasure to work with such dedicated individuals and we look forward to a long and prosperous relationship. The membership of NEPBA Local 500 ratified the contract by a vote of 378 in favor to 12 opposed.
Subject: Bush Defends Missile Defense Shield


Author:
By JENNIFER LOVEN Associated Press June 05, 2007
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 09:01:07 06/06/07 Wed

President Bush risked further stoking a testy dispute with Russia over a new U.S. missile defense system on Tuesday, saying that Moscow has 'derailed' once-promising democratic reforms.
In a speech celebrating democracy's progress around the globe _ and calling out places where its reach is either incomplete or lacking _ Bush said that free societies emerge 'at different speeds in different places' and have to reflect local customs. But he said certain values are universal to all democracies, and rapped several countries for not embracing them.
'In Russia, reforms that once promised to empower citizens have been derailed, with troubling implications for democratic development,' Bush said, speaking at a democracy conference here organized by former dissidents.
The president asserted that this discussion of democratic backsliding in Russia under the leadership of President Vladimir Putin was just one part of a strong relationship. 'America can maintain a friendship and push a nation toward democracy at the same time,' Bush said.
But the lecture, however gentle, was not likely to be well-received by Putin, already riled over what he sees as unwelcome meddling by the United States in Russia's sphere of influence.
Most recently, Moscow has become increasingly irritated by U.S. plans to build a missile shield in Eastern Europe, on Russia's doorstep.
U.S. officials have been alarmed by threatening statements from Putin and others over the proposed network. Russia believes the system _ with a radar base planned for the Czech Republic and interceptor missiles in neighboring Poland _ is meant for it. Putin has said he has no choice but to boost his nation's own military potential in response.
Putin warned over the weekend that Moscow could take 'retaliatory steps' including aiming nuclear weapons at U.S. military bases in Europe. China on Tuesday joined Russia in saying the shield could touch off a new arms race.
'Part of a good relationship is the ability to talk openly about our disagreements,' Bush said in the speech at Czernin Palace . 'So the United States will continue to build our relationships with these countries and we will do it without abandoning our principles or our values.'
Bush said this same approach applies to other allies with difficult democratic records, naming Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan and China.
Subject: Unmoderated Message Boards


Author:
Massmoderators
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 09:07:17 06/02/07 Sat


The following message boards will no longer be moderated until further notice (We would like have it last through the summer if possible):

Concord
Old Colony
MCICJ
Norfolk
Baystate
Gardner
Union Issues
Political
SECC Alumni

Please post responsibly. These are your message boards to use as you see fit, but please make every effort not to resort to pointless name calling, excessive profanity and vulgarity. All points of view are welcome within reason. Please post with professionalism in mind. Thank you! Enjoy!
Subject: Norfolk Message Board


Author:
MCIN Moderator
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 10:41:17 05/27/07 Sun

The Norfolk message board will be unmoderated until further notice. Enjoy your summer!
Subject: Union Message Board


Author:
Massmoderators
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 23:30:57 05/08/07 Tue


The Union Message Board will be unmoderated until further notice.
Subject: Feed them to the lions


Author:
Ceasar
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 17:28:57 05/08/07 Tue


Deval to managers: (Re)apply yourselves
By Casey Ross
Boston Herald Reporter

Tuesday, May 8, 2007 - Updated: 04:20 AM EST

Gov. Deval Patrick is launching a broad housecleaning of state government that could result in the dismissals of several top officials, including embattled Department of Social Services Commissioner Harry Spence.

Patrick, moving to strengthen his hold on state agencies, has asked about 50 top managers from previous GOP administrations to reapply for their jobs or expect to get the boot by June 1. The letter, distributed Friday, asks each manager to provide a justification for keeping his or her job.

“If you wish to be considered for reappointment, please forward immediately your resume, accomplishments, publications, personal statements and any other relevant information,” the letter reads.

Some State House insiders have expressed surprise that Patrick did not move more swiftly to remove Republican holdovers. The move comes after a series of early missteps by Patrick and personnel changes among his top advisers.

“Every secretary I have asked to compose a team of people who are pulling in the same direction and complement each others’ skills, who share information so we are not governing in silos,” Patrick said yesterday. . “There is no single formula for that.”

In addition to Spence, who has come under fire for deaths and injuries to children in DSS care, Patrick asked for resumes from Revenue chief Alan LeBovidge, Registrar of Motor Vehicles’ Anne Collins and Mental Health Commissioner Elizabeth Childs.

Kyle Sullivan, a spokesman for Patrick, said the letter does not mean there will be blanket firings. “The governor has asked each of the secretariats to build a team that shares this administration’s priorities and vision,” Sullivan said.

Spence, who was appointed head of DSS in late 2001 by Republican acting Gov. Jane Swift, has said publicly he hopes to keep his job. A spokeswoman said Spence was not available for comment.

Patrick said he’ll wait to hear a recommendation from his Health and Human Services Secretary JudyAnn Bigby on Spence’s future.

“I think Harry Spence is terrific. He’s brought a lot to the table, but every single Cabinet secretary is responsible for composing his or her team, obviously with my ultimate approval, and I trust them to do that,” Patrick said.
Subject: who's really being watched?


Author:
truth
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 18:08:13 05/04/07 Fri

From the top down. Including Mitt with his eye on 2008. They are the ones who will be getting laughed at the most. Former Commissioner Dumbass gets on the news and tells the good people of the commonwealth that she has disciplined over 400 officers this year for excessive force on inmates, which tells everyone watching that she is admitting wrong. Next thing you know over 400 inmates have law suits against the dept. and the commonwealth, the state pays out huge $$ to canteen (inmate accounts) and when Mitt goes to run in 2008, he will be the first republican in history who is soft on crime for taking convicted felons word over his employees, the sworn officer of the commonwealth. Good luck winning that in 2008.
Subject: Why don’t we honor our fallen servicemembers?


Author:
3D
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 17:36:08 05/01/07 Tue

Why don’t we honor our fallen servicemembers?
COMBINED JOINT TASK FORCE- 82
COMBINED PRESS INFORMATION CENTER
BAGRAM AIRFIELD, AFGHANISTAN
APO AE 09354

Press Center: 0799-063-013
bagrammediacenter@afghan.swa.army.mil
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
April 23, 2007
RELEASE # 144

Why don’t we honor our fallen servicemembers?

By Army Sgt. Jim Wilt
Combined Joint Task Force-82 Public Affairs Office

BAGRAM AIRFIELD, Afghanistan - Following the deaths of 32 Virginia Tech students, the President of the United States ordered that all American flags be flown at half-staff for one week.

In accordance with the president’s order, the U.S. flag at Bagram Airfield was raised to half-staff.
The deaths of the 32 students are a tragedy that was felt throughout the world. Even Afghan President Hamid Karazi gave his condolences to the U.S. on the loss of so many young lives. The president of a country, which has seen more than its fair share of young deaths, tipped his proverbial hat to these young people.

But I find it ironic that the flags were flown at half-staff for the young men and women who were killed at VT yet it is never lowered for the death of a U.S. servicemember.

Is the life of Sgt. Alexander Van Aalten, a member of our very own task force, killed April 20 in Helmand province not valued the same as these 32 students? Surely his death was as violent as the students.

Aalten’s death lacked the shock factor of the Virginia massacre. It is a daily occurrence these days to see X number of U.S. troops killed in Iraq or Afghanistan scrolling across the ticker at the bottom of the TV screen. People have come to expect casualty counts in the nightly news; they don’t expect to see 32 students killed.

Also, more parents have children in school than children in the military. This makes the deaths hit closer to home for a lot people.

The deaths of our friends and family members in the military are not forgotten by the citizens of our great country. We see this as people line the streets to honor those who lost their lives fighting for the freedom of our country and the freedom of other countries.

Individual states have taken it upon themselves to raise their flags to half-mast when one of their children dies.
I think it is sad that we do not raise the bases’ flag to half-staff when a member of our own task force dies.
Department of Defense directives mandate we honor our fallen leaders from former presidents to the state governors, but there is no provision for the men and women who die preserving our way of life.

I can understand not lowering flags across the country for the death of a single servicemember. But shouldn’t the servicemember’s state lower the flag to show their respect to the fallen trooper, if only for one day? Some states do, but not all of them.

At the very minimum, the servicemember’s forward operating base and the installation of his or her parent unit should show their respect by lowering the flag for one day.

We line the sides of Disney Drive here when one of our brothers or sisters in the service dies, but we don’t lower the flag they fight under. A person can argue that we have Memorial Day for this but tell that to the people who knew the person.

We walk down Disney Drive everyday and salute the ranks above us, and those above us salute back. This is a sign of respect.

The U.S. flag is more than a piece of cloth. It is a symbol, a symbol which represents the people of America.
Hundreds of thousands of men and women have died under our flag, preserving its people.
When we honor the flag by saluting it, we are honoring what it stands for. We honor freedom, the people it represents and a way of life.

Isn’t it time our flag saluted back when a person makes the ultimate sacrifice? Shouldn’t the flag, which represents our society, tip its hat when someone dies to ensure it will fly another day?

If the flags on our FOBs were lowered for just one day after the death of a servicemember, it would show the people who knew the person that society cared, the American people care.
Subject: Senator Jarrett Barrios


Author:
No more PAC money for this douche bag.
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 19:00:14 04/25/07 Wed

Replies:
Subject: THEY HAVE THE CASH


Author:
WHAT ABOUT US?
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 09:02:58 02/17/07 Sat

http://www.cjpc.org/February06Newsletter.htm


Annual cost to DOC of salaries for five MA Correctional Officers Union (MCOFU) board members: $455,0006


Adapted from “The MA Department of Correction (DOC) by the Numbers,” prepared by Angela Antoniewicz, August 2004, at http://www.cjpc.org/doc_doc_stats.htm. All statistics taken from the Governor’s Commission on Correction Reform Report except as noted.


1 Bureau of Justice Statistics. (June 2004). www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/pub/pdf/spe01.pdf
2 Bureau of Labor Statistics. (May 2003). http://www.bls.gov/oes/2003/may/oes333012.htm
3 Not adjusted for inflation percent for MA residents, extrapolated from the Report, 23.
4 Society for Human Resource Management. (2000). http://salary.com/benefits/layouthtmls/bnfl_display_nocat_ Ser27_Par65.html
5 DOC Advisory Council, Final Report, 16. This increase, attributed by the DOC to an increase in retirements, was disappointing to the AC.
6 DOC Advisory Council, Preliminary Repo
Replies:
Subject: THANK YOU


Author:
THANKS
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 19:44:38 04/18/07 Wed

As a Municipal Police Officer I want to support the Mass Correction Officers request for a raise. They are safeguarding the very worst of society that we arrest and send to prison. To further make it tough, they have a commissioner who supports the convicts more than her own Officers! Don't beleive the propaganda of the inmates' "rights" groups our Corrections Officers are among the most professional of the country. They not only need a raise, they need a commissioner with actual experience, someone with a correctional/Law Enforcement expeirence, not a social working /Counseling background. I cannot see how these part-time legislators and Politically connected State jobs get raise ,yet they turn a blind eye to the professionals who walk the tiers ever day keeping society safe.

J.O. Braintree
Subject: EXECUTIVE ORDER NO.478


Author:
REVOKING EXECUTIVE ORDER NO.452
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 16:29:29 02/13/07 Tue

BY HIS EXCELLENCY DEVAL L. PATRICK JAN 30th 2007 10:25 AM
ORDER REGARDING NON-DISCRIMINATION,DIVERSITY,EQUAL OPPORTUNITY,AND AFFIRMITIVE ACTION.RACIAL QUOTAS ARE BACK.PROMOTIONS WILL BE DONE BY SKIN COLOR,SEX AND RACIAL ORIGIN ONCE AGAIN.FORGET ABOUT YOUR SCORES,YOU,VE GOT MORE TO WORRY ABOUT THAN THAT.I WOULD LIKE TO SEE A CLASS ACTION DISCRIMINATION SUIT START SOON.IF ENOUGH PEOPLE SIGN ON ,TOGETHER WE CAN!!!!!
Replies:
Main index ] [ Archives: 123[4] ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.