Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

Subject: Re:Nope, not Sturgil.

Author: fan

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 01:39:30 06/30/17 Fri Author Host/IP: NoHost/172.78.208.132 In reply to: Fin 's message, "I think maybe top 5 but no win" on 20:05:32 06/29/17 Thu >>>Agreed with Smith and Renard. >>>I agree. Sturgil thinks she is all that but she is just superficial and just pain rude. Try being nice first then being a role model. >>>Renard is a front-runner, but if you notice her >>>interactions with the other contestants you can tell >>>she is NOT well liked. It was very apparent at >>>orientation weekend. I hope she does well but based >on >>>what I saw and what I know, she wouldn't be the best >>>representative for WA. >>> >>>Sturgil thinks she has it in the bag and she might, >>>but one must wonder if she has the face for the job. >>> >>>Smith is definitely someone who would be an >>>interesting and fun titleholder - is her talent >strong >>>enough to win WA? She'd be killed at MAO with what >she >>>did at the open/sweeper. >>> >>>Murphy is stunningly beautiful on stage - no idea >what >>>her interview is like though. >>> >>>Abbott is incredible in talent but couldn't win a >>>local last year so I think her 1RU the year before >was >>>a fluke. >>> >>>Springer is a dark horse - she's extremely smart so I >>>would imagine her interview scores high, if she >brings >>>her A game she could be in the top 5 for sure... >>> >>>Ultimately, I think it's going to come down to >>>Sturgil, Smith, and Renard... [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> [> [> [> Subject: Enough, we get the picture...you dont like Gabby "Washington Mom"

Author: Fan [ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 08:38:51 06/30/17 Fri Author Host/IP: 71-212-19-200.tukw.qwest.net/71.212.19.200 >>>>Agreed with Smith and Renard. >>>>I agree. Sturgil thinks she is all that but she is >just superficial and just pain rude. Try being nice >first then being a role model. > >>>>Renard is a front-runner, but if you notice her >>>>interactions with the other contestants you can tell >>>>she is NOT well liked. It was very apparent at >>>>orientation weekend. I hope she does well >>>>what I saw and what I know, she wouldn't be the best >>>>representative for WA. >>>> >>>>Sturgil thinks she has it in the bag and she might, >>>>but one must wonder if she has the face for the >job. >>>> >>>>Smith is definitely someone who would be an >>>>interesting and fun titleholder - is her talent >>strong >>>>enough to win WA? She'd be killed at MAO with what >>she >>>>did at the open/sweeper. >>>> >>>>Murphy is stunningly beautiful on stage - no idea >>what >>>>her interview is like though. >>>> >>>>Abbott is incredible in talent but couldn't win a >>>>local last year so I think her 1RU the year before >>was >>>>a fluke. >>>> >>>>Springer is a dark horse - she's extremely smart so >I >>>>would imagine her interview scores high, if she >>brings >>>>her A game she could be in the top 5 for sure... >>>> >>>>Ultimately, I think it's going to come down to >>>>Sturgil, Smith, and Renard... [ Post a Reply to This Message ]

[> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Oh look, her director is here. Everyone has an opinion on who places.

Author: Stop tying to censor what others write who will be top 5 [ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 05:39:24 07/01/17 Sat Author Host/IP: c-67-160-70-51.hsd1.wa.comcast.net/67.160.70.51 >>>>>Agreed with Smith and Renard. >>>>>I agree. Sturgil thinks she is all that but she is >>just superficial and just pain rude. Try being nice >>first then being a role model. >> >>>>>Renard is a front-runner, but if you notice her >>>>>interactions with the other contestants you can >tell >>>>>she is NOT well liked. It was very apparent at >>>>>orientation weekend. I hope she does well >>>>>what I saw and what I know, she wouldn't be the >best >>>>>representative for WA. >>>>> >>>>>Sturgil thinks she has it in the bag and she might, >>>>>but one must wonder if she has the face for the >>job. >>>>> >>>>>Smith is definitely someone who would be an >>>>>interesting and fun titleholder - is her talent >>>strong >>>>>enough to win WA? She'd be killed at MAO with what >>>she >>>>>did at the open/sweeper. >>>>> >>>>>Murphy is stunningly beautiful on stage - no idea >>>what >>>>>her interview is like though. >>>>> >>>>>Abbott is incredible in talent but couldn't win a >>>>>local last year so I think her 1RU the year before >>>was >>>>>a fluke. >>>>> >>>>>Springer is a dark horse - she's extremely smart so >>I >>>>>would imagine her interview scores high, if she >>>brings >>>>>her A game she could be in the top 5 for sure... >>>>> >>>>>Ultimately, I think it's going to come down to >>>>>Sturgil, Smith, and Renard... [ Post a Reply to This Message ]