Re: Is Life Threat the Only Measure for what should be allowed? -- NAS Lowry Student Opinions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1] ]

Subject:

Re: Is Life Threat the Only Measure for what should be allowed?

Author:
Jose Castillo

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 14:00:46 02/27/07 Tue
In reply to: Robert Hubbard 's message, "Is Life Threat the Only Measure for what should be allowed?" on 14:15:39 02/26/07 Mon

but stealing is a crime as are all the other things you listed and they make the area your in bad. alot of people wont go into neighborhoods because of all the things you listed, but i dont think people will look down on people on there cell phones, it doesnt affect the community in anyway and if you are in a public place you should just put up with it seeing how its public,im not saying its ok to do anything in public but its just dumb to not be able to use cell phones.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]