VoyForums

Sat February 16, 2019 19:27:56Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]3456789 ]
Subject: Re: Tom Chan(CWC) 陳緯駿真是最有問題的老師


Author:
TKP
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 22:56:24 06/06/09 Sat
In reply to: Louis wool 's message, "Re: Tom Chan(CWC) 陳緯駿真是最有問題的老師" on 19:01:35 06/06/09 Sat

>>>>>>>>請大家選舉最有問題的老師 可在此提名及解釋
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>最有問題谓當然是指壞處 如態度 教學方式
>等等
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>同學,與其要選舉最有問題既老師,
>>>>>>>何不選舉一些用心教學既老師, 指出他們的好處?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>指出他們的壞處也可以令他們明白自己的不足之處
>>>>>
>>>>>本人認為最有問題是Tom
>>>>>Chan•他很嚴肅•及小事化大,與偉大的姚sir的處事中旨
>�
>>�
>>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>,他會為一些微不足道的事情責罵同學,如有人在課室玩�
>�
>>"
>>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>",(一種擲紙的遊戲),他會罰全班一起留堂罰抄,本人認
>�
>>�
>>>�
>>>>S
>>>>>有必要這樣做,學生貪玩是必然的,只需責罰幾句就算數�
>A
>>�
>>>L
>>>>�
>>>>>袚d咁多野去曬學生時間。
>>>>即是說你沒反省過
>>>>學生貪玩是必然的,但本來貪玩就是會闖禍,我認為Tom
>>>>Chan沒做錯
>>>
>>>請問Tom
>Chan的中文名是什麼?他教什麼科目?教得好唔好?
>>
>>Tom Chan叫 (CWC) 陳緯駿,他好似教phy 同
>>chem,教得好唔好就見人見智,不過d學生話zinc 同 程sir
>>好d
>
>我個人都覺得Zinc 同
>Mr程教得好D,佢地有時上得好輕鬆,但Tom Chan就很嚴肅,郁 d
>就罰同記野,but anyway見人見智啦。

記得中3個時有好多人玩飛毯,結果比陳緯駿Tom Chan罰,多過半班的人也要留堂罰抄,留到6點,雖然Tom Chan為我地好,但都未免太strict了. . .

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan(CWC) 陳緯駿真是最有問題的老師


Author:
史巴詩星人
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 11:45:59 06/08/09 Mon

>>>>>>>>>請大家選舉最有問題的老師 可在此提名及解釋
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>最有問題谓當然是指壞處 如態度 教學方式
>>等等
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>同學,與其要選舉最有問題既老師,
>>>>>>>>何不選舉一些用心教學既老師, 指出他們的好處?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>指出他們的壞處也可以令他們明白自己的不足之處
>>>>>>
>>>>>>本人認為最有問題是Tom
>>>>>>Chan•他很嚴肅•及小事化大,與偉大的姚sir的處事中�
>�
>>�
>>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>�
>>>>>>,他會為一些微不足道的事情責罵同學,如有人在課室玩
>�
>>�
>>>"
>>>>�
>>>>>�
>>>>>>",(一種擲紙的遊戲),他會罰全班一起留堂罰抄,本人�
>{
>>�
>>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>S
>>>>>>有必要這樣做,學生貪玩是必然的,只需責罰幾句就算數
>�
>>A
>>>�
>>>>L
>>>>>�
>>>>>>袚d咁多野去曬學生時間。
>>>>>即是說你沒反省過
>>>>>學生貪玩是必然的,但本來貪玩就是會闖禍,我認為Tom
>>>>>Chan沒做錯
>>>>
>>>>請問Tom
>>Chan的中文名是什麼?他教什麼科目?教得好唔好?
>>>
>>>Tom Chan叫 (CWC) 陳緯駿,他好似教phy 同
>>>chem,教得好唔好就見人見智,不過d學生話zinc 同 程sir
>>>好d
>>
>>我個人都覺得Zinc 同
>>Mr程教得好D,佢地有時上得好輕鬆,但Tom Chan就很嚴肅,郁 d
>>就罰同記野,but anyway見人見智啦。
>
>記得中3個時有好多人玩飛毯,結果比陳緯駿Tom
>Chan罰,多過半班的人也要留堂罰抄,留到6點,雖然Tom
>Chan為我地好,但都未免太strict了. . .

Tom Chan個樣好惡,令人不敢接近他,冇其他老師咁受歡迎
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan(CWC) 陳緯駿真是最有問題的老師


Author:
Amaths 王
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 09:54:41 06/10/09 Wed

>>>>>>>>>>請大家選舉最有問題的老師 可在此提名及解釋
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>最有問題谓當然是指壞處 如態度 教學方式
>>>等等
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>同學,與其要選舉最有問題既老師,
>>>>>>>>>何不選舉一些用心教學既老師, 指出他們的好處?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>指出他們的壞處也可以令他們明白自己的不足之處
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>本人認為最有問題是Tom
>>>>>>>Chan•他很嚴肅•及小事化大,與偉大的姚sir的處事中
>�
>>�
>>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>�
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>,他會為一些微不足道的事情責罵同學,如有人在課室�
>�
>>�
>>>�
>>>>"
>>>>>�
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>",(一種擲紙的遊戲),他會罰全班一起留堂罰抄,本人
>�
>>{
>>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>�
>>>>>>S
>>>>>>>有必要這樣做,學生貪玩是必然的,只需責罰幾句就算�
>�
>>�
>>>A
>>>>�
>>>>>L
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>袚d咁多野去曬學生時間。
>>>>>>即是說你沒反省過
>>>>>>學生貪玩是必然的,但本來貪玩就是會闖禍,我認為Tom
>>>>>>Chan沒做錯
>>>>>
>>>>>請問Tom
>>>Chan的中文名是什麼?他教什麼科目?教得好唔好?
>>>>
>>>>Tom Chan叫 (CWC) 陳緯駿,他好似教phy 同
>>>>chem,教得好唔好就見人見智,不過d學生話zinc 同 程sir
>>>>好d
>>>
>>>我個人都覺得Zinc 同
>>>Mr程教得好D,佢地有時上得好輕鬆,但Tom Chan就很嚴肅,郁
>d
>>>就罰同記野,but anyway見人見智啦。
>>
>>記得中3個時有好多人玩飛毯,結果比陳緯駿Tom
>>Chan罰,多過半班的人也要留堂罰抄,留到6點,雖然Tom
>>Chan為我地好,但都未免太strict了. . .
>
>Tom Chan個樣好惡,令人不敢接近他,冇其他老師咁受歡迎

Tom Chan係咪教低form架,聽d師兄講話佢唔係好教得掂高form
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan(CWC) 陳緯駿真是最有問題的老師


Author:
Oiloon
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 14:47:17 06/10/09 Wed

>>>>>>>>>>>請大家選舉最有問題的老師 可在此提名及解釋
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>最有問題谓當然是指壞處 如態度 教學方式
>>>>等等
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>同學,與其要選舉最有問題既老師,
>>>>>>>>>>何不選舉一些用心教學既老師, 指出他們的好處?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>指出他們的壞處也可以令他們明白自己的不足之處
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>本人認為最有問題是Tom
>>>>>>>>Chan•他很嚴肅•及小事化大,與偉大的姚sir的處事�
>�
>>�
>>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>�
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>,他會為一些微不足道的事情責罵同學,如有人在課室
>�
>>�
>>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>"
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>",(一種擲紙的遊戲),他會罰全班一起留堂罰抄,本�
>H
>>�
>>>{
>>>>�
>>>>>�
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>S
>>>>>>>>有必要這樣做,學生貪玩是必然的,只需責罰幾句就算
>�
>>�
>>>�
>>>>A
>>>>>�
>>>>>>L
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>袚d咁多野去曬學生時間。
>>>>>>>即是說你沒反省過
>>>>>>>學生貪玩是必然的,但本來貪玩就是會闖禍,我認為Tom
>>>>>>>Chan沒做錯
>>>>>>
>>>>>>請問Tom
>>>>Chan的中文名是什麼?他教什麼科目?教得好唔好?
>>>>>
>>>>>Tom Chan叫 (CWC) 陳緯駿,他好似教phy 同
>>>>>chem,教得好唔好就見人見智,不過d學生話zinc 同
>程sir
>>>>>好d
>>>>
>>>>我個人都覺得Zinc 同
>>>>Mr程教得好D,佢地有時上得好輕鬆,但Tom Chan就很嚴肅,郁
>>d
>>>>就罰同記野,but anyway見人見智啦。
>>>
>>>記得中3個時有好多人玩飛毯,結果比陳緯駿Tom
>>>Chan罰,多過半班的人也要留堂罰抄,留到6點,雖然Tom
>>>Chan為我地好,但都未免太strict了. . .
>>
>>Tom Chan個樣好惡,令人不敢接近他,冇其他老師咁受歡迎
>
>Tom Chan係咪教低form架,聽d師兄講話佢唔係好教得掂高form

Tom Chan form3個時做我班主任,個時唔記得係咪日子,有一排要捐錢,咁人人都捐散子,跟住Tom Chan 叫人幫手 "唱" 散子,得好少人肯唱,最後Tom Chan 是但選幾個人,然後迫人唱散子,我覺得佢咁做有佢的理由,但未免太硬來了,為此等小事令到學生不高興,不太值得。
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan(CWC) 陳緯駿真是最有問題的老師


Author:
阿達
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 15:36:31 06/10/09 Wed

>>>>>>>>>>>>請大家選舉最有問題的老師 可在此提名及解釋
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>最有問題谓當然是指壞處 如態度 教學方式
>>>>>等等
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>同學,與其要選舉最有問題既老師,
>>>>>>>>>>>何不選舉一些用心教學既老師, 指出他們的好處?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>指出他們的壞處也可以令他們明白自己的不足之處
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>本人認為最有問題是Tom
>>>>>>>>>Chan•他很嚴肅•及小事化大,與偉大的姚sir的處事
>�
>>�
>>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>�
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>,他會為一些微不足道的事情責罵同學,如有人在課�
>�
>>�
>>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>�
>>>>>>"
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>",(一種擲紙的遊戲),他會罰全班一起留堂罰抄,本
>�
>>H
>>>�
>>>>{
>>>>>�
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>S
>>>>>>>>>有必要這樣做,學生貪玩是必然的,只需責罰幾句就�
>�
>>�
>>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>A
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>L
>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>袚d咁多野去曬學生時間。
>>>>>>>>即是說你沒反省過
>>>>>>>>學生貪玩是必然的,但本來貪玩就是會闖禍,我認為To
>m
>>>>>>>>Chan沒做錯
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>請問Tom
>>>>>Chan的中文名是什麼?他教什麼科目?教得好唔好?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Tom Chan叫 (CWC) 陳緯駿,他好似教phy 同
>>>>>>chem,教得好唔好就見人見智,不過d學生話zinc 同
>>程sir
>>>>>>好d
>>>>>
>>>>>我個人都覺得Zinc 同
>>>>>Mr程教得好D,佢地有時上得好輕鬆,但Tom
>Chan就很嚴肅,郁
>>>d
>>>>>就罰同記野,but anyway見人見智啦。
>>>>
>>>>記得中3個時有好多人玩飛毯,結果比陳緯駿Tom
>>>>Chan罰,多過半班的人也要留堂罰抄,留到6點,雖然Tom
>>>>Chan為我地好,但都未免太strict了. . .
>>>
>>>Tom Chan個樣好惡,令人不敢接近他,冇其他老師咁受歡迎
>>
>>Tom
>Chan係咪教低form架,聽d師兄講話佢唔係好教得掂高form
>
>Tom Chan
>form3個時做我班主任,個時唔記得係咪日子,有一排要捐錢,
>咁人人都捐散子,跟住Tom Chan 叫人幫手 "唱"
>散子,得好少人肯唱,最後Tom Chan
>是但選幾個人,然後迫人唱散子,我覺得佢咁做有佢的理由,�
>蹵憫K太硬來了,為此等小事令到學生不高興,不太值得。

同意 有時佢只聽片面之詞 就懲罰同學 跟Miss On一樣 問都唔問清楚
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: 算啦


Author:

[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 21:12:26 06/10/09 Wed

算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工, 唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假. 而且食髓知味! 我係佢索性唔做好過.
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: 算啦


Author:
DavidM
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 11:48:21 06/11/09 Thu

>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假. 而且食髓知味!
>我係佢索性唔做好過.


Tom Chan有返工又點,
教得唔好,
做得唔好,
我係Tom Chan就會做好d
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: 算啦


Author:
Fa Yin
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 13:43:13 06/11/09 Thu

>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假. 而且食髓知味!
>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>
>
>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>教得唔好,
>做得唔好,
>我係Tom Chan就會做好d

Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part 好多人答錯,Tom Chan係咁咦say sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人答對!!
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Tom Chan是最有問題的老師


Author:
kai 正
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 18:27:59 06/14/09 Sun

>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假. 而且食髓知味!
>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>
>>
>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>教得唔好,
>>做得唔好,
>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>
>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part 好多人答錯,Tom
>Chan係咁咦say
>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人答對!!

我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之前派幾個打手泥搞事
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan是最有問題的老師


Author:
old boy
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 13:06:21 06/15/09 Mon

>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假. 而且食髓知味!
>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>
>>>
>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>教得唔好,
>>>做得唔好,
>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>
>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part 好多人答錯,Tom
>>Chan係咁咦say
>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人答對!!
>
>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之前派幾個打手泥�
>d事

tom chan 好鐘意小事化大•又難係嚴肅•乜都揸正黎做•好多人都唔like佢
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan是最有問題的老師


Author:
手指長
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 20:29:10 06/16/09 Tue

>>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假. 而且食髓知味!
>>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>>教得唔好,
>>>>做得唔好,
>>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>>
>>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part 好多人答錯,Tom
>>>Chan係咁咦say
>>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人答對!!
>>
>>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之前派幾個打手泥
>�
>>d事
>
>tom chan
>好鐘意小事化大•又難係嚴肅•乜都揸正黎做•好多人�
>ㄜ鷲ike佢

Nelson Fung教書好好 好過Tom Chan Tom Chan不如做番差人啦 教書不適合他
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: 心水清的人應該發現


Author:
過氣校友
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 00:03:35 06/17/09 Wed

心水清的人應該發現, 這一大堆回應是來自同一人. 相信亦是在九濟堂不斷侮辱同學, 老師的那位5E學生.
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: 心水清的人應該發現


Author:
asd
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 19:16:12 06/18/09 Thu

>心水清的人應該發現, 這一大堆回應是來自同一人.
>相信亦是在九濟堂不斷侮辱同學, 老師的那位5E學生.
雖然你地可能真係同一個人
不過TOMCHAN真係教得唔係好dim!
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan是最有問題的老師


Author:
愛校人
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 12:41:47 06/17/09 Wed

>>>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假.
>而且食髓知味!
>>>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>>>教得唔好,
>>>>>做得唔好,
>>>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>>>
>>>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part 好多人答錯,Tom
>>>>Chan係咁咦say
>>>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人答對!!
>>>
>>>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之前派幾個打手�
>d
>>�
>>>d事
>>
>>tom chan
>>好鐘意小事化大•又難係嚴肅•乜都揸正黎做•好多人
>�
>>ㄜ鷲ike佢
>
>Nelson Fung教書好好 好過Tom Chan Tom
>Chan不如做番差人啦 教書不適合他

同意,不過可能是幾位5E學生
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan是最有問題的老師


Author:
博士
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 20:20:10 06/18/09 Thu

>>>>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假.
>>而且食髓知味!
>>>>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>>>>教得唔好,
>>>>>>做得唔好,
>>>>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>>>>
>>>>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>>>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part 好多人答錯,Tom
>>>>>Chan係咁咦say
>>>>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人答對!!
>>>>
>>>>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之前派幾個打手
>�
>>d
>>>�
>>>>d事
>>>
>>>tom chan
>>>好鐘意小事化大•又難係嚴肅•乜都揸正黎做•好多�
>H
>>�
>>>ㄜ鷲ike佢
>>
>>Nelson Fung教書好好 好過Tom Chan Tom
>>Chan不如做番差人啦 教書不適合他
>
>同意,不過可能是幾位5E學生

為何總是一口咬定是5E的人搞事呢?不可以是form1,form2,form3嗎?一定是E班嗎?希望校友和同學們可以想清楚才下判斷
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan是最有問題的老師


Author:
IQ<100 100%仆街 的人
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 14:48:36 07/28/09 Tue

>>>>>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假.
>>>而且食髓知味!
>>>>>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>>>>>教得唔好,
>>>>>>>做得唔好,
>>>>>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>>>>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part 好多人答錯,Tom
>>>>>>Chan係咁咦say
>>>>>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人答對!!
>>>>>
>>>>>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之前派幾個打?>?>>�
>>>d
>>>>�
>>>>>d事
>>>>
>>>>tom chan
>>>>好鐘意小事化大•又難係嚴肅•乜都揸正黎做•好多
>�
>>H
>>>�
>>>>ㄜ鷲ike佢
>>>
>>>Nelson Fung教書好好 好過Tom Chan Tom
>>>Chan不如做番差人啦 教書不適合他
>>
>>同意,不過可能是幾位5E學生
>
>為何總是一口咬定是5E的人搞事呢?不可以是form1,form2,for
>m3嗎?一定是E班嗎?希望校友和同學們可以想清楚才下判斷
D人個個扮5E整, 影衰哂5E. 大家無evidence就唔好亂講.
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan是最有問題的老師


Author:
Billy仔話要Rap 一 rap, 就唔會sad, 玩gap gap, 洗pat pat
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 10:50:36 07/31/09 Fri

>>>>>>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>>>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假.
>>>>而且食髓知味!
>>>>>>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>>>>>>教得唔好,
>>>>>>>>做得唔好,
>>>>>>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>>>>>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part 好多人答錯,Tom
>>>>>>>Chan係咁咦say
>>>>>>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人答對!!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之前派幾個打
>?>?>>�
>>>>d
>>>>>�
>>>>>>d事
>>>>>
>>>>>tom chan
>>>>>好鐘意小事化大•又難係嚴肅•乜都揸正黎做•好�
>h
>>�
>>>H
>>>>�
>>>>>ㄜ鷲ike佢
>>>>
>>>>Nelson Fung教書好好 好過Tom Chan Tom
>>>>Chan不如做番差人啦 教書不適合他
>>>
>>>同意,不過可能是幾位5E學生
>>
>>為何總是一口咬定是5E的人搞事呢?不可以是form1,form2,fo
>r
>>m3嗎?一定是E班嗎?希望校友和同學們可以想清楚才下判斷
>D人個個扮5E整, 影衰哂5E. 大家無evidence就唔好亂講.


咁又係,你都講得幾有道理
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Tom Chan一定是最有問題的老師,nelson最好


Author:
海狗王
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 17:54:54 08/01/09 Sat

>>>>>>>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>>>>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假.
>>>>>而且食髓知味!
>>>>>>>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>>>>>>>教得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>做得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>>>>>>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part 好多人答錯,Tom
>>>>>>>>Chan係咁咦say
>>>>>>>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人答對!!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之前派幾個�
>�
>>?>?>>�
>>>>>d
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>d事
>>>>>>
>>>>>>tom chan
>>>>>>好鐘意小事化大•又難係嚴肅•乜都揸正黎做•好
>�
>>h
>>>�
>>>>H
>>>>>�
>>>>>>ㄜ鷲ike佢
>>>>>
>>>>>Nelson Fung教書好好 好過Tom Chan Tom
>>>>>Chan不如做番差人啦 教書不適合他
>>>>
>>>>同意,不過可能是幾位5E學生
>>>
>>>為何總是一口咬定是5E的人搞事呢?不可以是form1,form2,f
>o
>>r
>>>m3嗎?一定是E班嗎?希望校友和同學們可以想清楚才下判斷
>>D人個個扮5E整, 影衰哂5E. 大家無evidence就唔好亂講.
>
>
>咁又係,你都講得幾有道理


Tom Chan係咪教form6 chem?
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan一定是最有問題的老師,nelson最好


Author:
我愛Tom Chan
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 14:42:59 08/07/09 Fri

>>>>>>>>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>>>>>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假.
>>>>>>而且食髓知味!
>>>>>>>>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>>>>>>>>教得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>做得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>>>>>>>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part 好多人答錯,Tom
>>>>>>>>>Chan係咁咦say
>>>>>>>>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人答對!!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之前派幾個
>�
>>�
>>>?>?>>�
>>>>>>d
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>d事
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>tom chan
>>>>>>>好鐘意小事化大•又難係嚴肅•乜都揸正黎做•�
>n
>>�
>>>h
>>>>�
>>>>>H
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>ㄜ鷲ike佢
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Nelson Fung教書好好 好過Tom Chan Tom
>>>>>>Chan不如做番差人啦 教書不適合他
>>>>>
>>>>>同意,不過可能是幾位5E學生
>>>>
>>>>為何總是一口咬定是5E的人搞事呢?不可以是form1,form2,
>f
>>o
>>>r
>>>>m3嗎?一定是E班嗎?希望校友和同學們可以想清楚才下判�
>_
>>>D人個個扮5E整, 影衰哂5E. 大家無evidence就唔好亂講.
>>
>>
>>咁又係,你都講得幾有道理
>
>
>Tom Chan係咪教form6 chem?


Tom Chan 會考好似有30分,勁人
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan一定是最有問題的老師,nelson最好


Author:
Angel
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 21:03:07 08/14/09 Fri

>>>>>>>>>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>>>>>>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假.
>>>>>>>而且食髓知味!
>>>>>>>>>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>>>>>>>>>教得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>做得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>>>>>>>>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part 好多人答錯,Tom
>>>>>>>>>>Chan係咁咦say
>>>>>>>>>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人答對!!
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之前派幾�
>�
>>�
>>>�
>>>>?>?>>�
>>>>>>>d
>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>d事
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>tom chan
>>>>>>>>好鐘意小事化大•又難係嚴肅•乜都揸正黎做•
>�
>>n
>>>�
>>>>h
>>>>>�
>>>>>>H
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>ㄜ鷲ike佢
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Nelson Fung教書好好 好過Tom Chan Tom
>>>>>>>Chan不如做番差人啦 教書不適合他
>>>>>>
>>>>>>同意,不過可能是幾位5E學生
>>>>>
>>>>>為何總是一口咬定是5E的人搞事呢?不可以是form1,form2
>,
>>f
>>>o
>>>>r
>>>>>m3嗎?一定是E班嗎?希望校友和同學們可以想清楚才下判
>�
>>_
>>>>D人個個扮5E整, 影衰哂5E. 大家無evidence就唔好亂講.
>>>
>>>
>>>咁又係,你都講得幾有道理
>>
>>
>>Tom Chan係咪教form6 chem?
>
>
>Tom Chan 會考好似有30分,勁人


係咪呀,我唔係幾信
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan一定是最有問題的老師,nelson最好


Author:
種金的人
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 12:56:47 08/15/09 Sat

>>>>>>>>>>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假.
>>>>>>>>而且食髓知味!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>>>>>>>>>>教得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>做得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>>>>>>>>>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part 好多人答錯,Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>Chan係咁咦say
>>>>>>>>>>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人答對!
>!
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之前派幾
>�
>>�
>>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>?>?>>�
>>>>>>>>d
>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>d事
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>tom chan
>>>>>>>>>好鐘意小事化大•又難係嚴肅•乜都揸正黎做�
>E
>>�
>>>n
>>>>�
>>>>>h
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>H
>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>ㄜ鷲ike佢
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Nelson Fung教書好好 好過Tom Chan Tom
>>>>>>>>Chan不如做番差人啦 教書不適合他
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>同意,不過可能是幾位5E學生
>>>>>>
>>>>>>為何總是一口咬定是5E的人搞事呢?不可以是form1,form
>2
>>,
>>>f
>>>>o
>>>>>r
>>>>>>m3嗎?一定是E班嗎?希望校友和同學們可以想清楚才下�
>P
>>�
>>>_
>>>>>D人個個扮5E整, 影衰哂5E. 大家無evidence就唔好亂講.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>咁又係,你都講得幾有道理
>>>
>>>
>>>Tom Chan係咪教form6 chem?
>>
>>
>>Tom Chan 會考好似有30分,勁人
>
>
>係咪呀,我唔係幾信

你係咪TOM CHAN打手AR.作到咁大,30分= =
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan一定是最有問題的老師,nelson最好


Author:

[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 00:04:40 08/16/09 Sun

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假.
>>>>>>>>>而且食髓知味!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>教得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>做得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>>>>>>>>>>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part 好多人答錯,Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>>Chan係咁咦say
>>>>>>>>>>>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人答對
>!
>>!
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之前派?>X
>>�
>>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>�
>>>>>>?>?>>�
>>>>>>>>>d
>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>d事
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>tom chan
>>>>>>>>>>好鐘意小事化大•又難係嚴肅•乜都揸正黎做
>�
>>E
>>>�
>>>>n
>>>>>�
>>>>>>h
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>H
>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>ㄜ鷲ike佢
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Nelson Fung教書好好 好過Tom Chan Tom
>>>>>>>>>Chan不如做番差人啦 教書不適合他
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>同意,不過可能是幾位5E學生
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>為何總是一口咬定是5E的人搞事呢?不可以是form1,for
>m
>>2
>>>,
>>>>f
>>>>>o
>>>>>>r
>>>>>>>m3嗎?一定是E班嗎?希望校友和同學們可以想清楚才下
>�
>>P
>>>�
>>>>_
>>>>>>D人個個扮5E整, 影衰哂5E. 大家無evidence就唔好亂講.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>咁又係,你都講得幾有道理
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Tom Chan係咪教form6 chem?
>>>
>>>
>>>Tom Chan 會考好似有30分,勁人
>>
>>
>>係咪呀,我唔係幾信
>
>你係咪TOM CHAN打手AR.作到咁大,30分= =

讀得好唔代表惜教書
30分大晒咩!!
教得唔好就唔好教la
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan一定是最有問題的老師,nelson最好


Author:
狗神
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 23:35:29 08/16/09 Sun

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假.
>>>>>>>>>>而且食髓知味!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>教得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>做得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>>>>>>>>>>>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part 好多人答錯,Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Chan係咁咦say
>>>>>>>>>>>>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人答�
>�
>>!
>>>!
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之前派
>?>X
>>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>�
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>?>?>>�
>>>>>>>>>>d
>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>d事
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>tom chan
>>>>>>>>>>>好鐘意小事化大•又難係嚴肅•乜都揸正黎�
>�
>>�
>>>E
>>>>�
>>>>>n
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>h
>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>H
>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>ㄜ鷲ike佢
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>Nelson Fung教書好好 好過Tom Chan Tom
>>>>>>>>>>Chan不如做番差人啦 教書不適合他
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>同意,不過可能是幾位5E學生
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>為何總是一口咬定是5E的人搞事呢?不可以是form1,fo
>r
>>m
>>>2
>>>>,
>>>>>f
>>>>>>o
>>>>>>>r
>>>>>>>>m3嗎?一定是E班嗎?希望校友和同學們可以想清楚才�
>U
>>�
>>>P
>>>>�
>>>>>_
>>>>>>>D人個個扮5E整, 影衰哂5E.
>大家無evidence就唔好亂講.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>咁又係,你都講得幾有道理
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Tom Chan係咪教form6 chem?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Tom Chan 會考好似有30分,勁人
>>>
>>>
>>>係咪呀,我唔係幾信
>>
>>你係咪TOM CHAN打手AR.作到咁大,30分= =
>
>讀得好唔代表惜教書
>30分大晒咩!!
>教得唔好就唔好教la

nelson教得最好
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan一定是最有問題的老師,nelson最好


Author:
old boy
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 14:40:47 09/01/09 Tue

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假.
>>>>>>>>>>>而且食髓知味!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>教得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>做得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part 好多人答錯,Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Chan係咁咦say
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人答
>�
>>�
>>>!
>>>>!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之前�
>�
>>?>X
>>>>�
>>>>>�
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>?>?>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>d
>>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>d事
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>tom chan
>>>>>>>>>>>>好鐘意小事化大•又難係嚴肅•乜都揸正黎
>�
>>�
>>>�
>>>>E
>>>>>�
>>>>>>n
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>h
>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>H
>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>ㄜ鷲ike佢
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>Nelson Fung教書好好 好過Tom Chan Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>Chan不如做番差人啦 教書不適合他
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>同意,不過可能是幾位5E學生
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>為何總是一口咬定是5E的人搞事呢?不可以是form1,f
>o
>>r
>>>m
>>>>2
>>>>>,
>>>>>>f
>>>>>>>o
>>>>>>>>r
>>>>>>>>>m3嗎?一定是E班嗎?希望校友和同學們可以想清楚才
>�
>>U
>>>�
>>>>P
>>>>>�
>>>>>>_
>>>>>>>>D人個個扮5E整, 影衰哂5E.
>>大家無evidence就唔好亂講.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>咁又係,你都講得幾有道理
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Tom Chan係咪教form6 chem?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>Tom Chan 會考好似有30分,勁人
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>係咪呀,我唔係幾信
>>>
>>>你係咪TOM CHAN打手AR.作到咁大,30分= =
>>
>>讀得好唔代表惜教書
>>30分大晒咩!!
>>教得唔好就唔好教la
>
>nelson教得最好

Nelson really does a good job, but he uses Chinese in his lessons.
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Re: Tom Chan一定是最有問題的老師,nelson最好


Author:
Current Boy
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 19:51:27 09/04/09 Fri

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假.
>>>>>>>>>>>>而且食髓知味!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>教得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>做得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part
>好多人答錯,Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Chan係咁咦say
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人?>?>>�
>>>�
>>>>!
>>>>>!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之前
>�
>>�
>>>?>X
>>>>>�
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>?>?>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>d
>>>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>d事
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>tom chan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>好鐘意小事化大•又難係嚴肅•乜都揸正?>?>>�
>>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>E
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>n
>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>h
>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>H
>>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>ㄜ鷲ike佢
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>Nelson Fung教書好好 好過Tom Chan Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>>Chan不如做番差人啦 教書不適合他
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>同意,不過可能是幾位5E學生
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>為何總是一口咬定是5E的人搞事呢?不可以是form1,
>f
>>o
>>>r
>>>>m
>>>>>2
>>>>>>,
>>>>>>>f
>>>>>>>>o
>>>>>>>>>r
>>>>>>>>>>m3嗎?一定是E班嗎?希望校友和同學們可以想清楚?>~
>>�
>>>U
>>>>�
>>>>>P
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>_
>>>>>>>>>D人個個扮5E整, 影衰哂5E.
>>>大家無evidence就唔好亂講.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>咁又係,你都講得幾有道理
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Tom Chan係咪教form6 chem?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Tom Chan 會考好似有30分,勁人
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>係咪呀,我唔係幾信
>>>>
>>>>你係咪TOM CHAN打手AR.作到咁大,30分= =
>>>
>>>讀得好唔代表惜教書
>>>30分大晒咩!!
>>>教得唔好就唔好教la
>>
>>nelson教得最好
>
>Nelson really does a good job, but he uses Chinese in
>his lessons.


Why he can't use Chinese? That's good for students to learn Maths easily and will FULLY understanding on that topic.
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: Nelson Fung一定是最好的老師,nelson最好


Author:
講手王
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 19:00:59 09/24/09 Thu

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>而且食髓知味!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>教得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>做得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part
>>好多人答錯,Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Chan係咁咦say
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的人
>?>?>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>!
>>>>>>!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之�
>e
>>�
>>>�
>>>>?>X
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>?>?>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>d
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>d事
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>tom chan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>好鐘意小事化大•又難係嚴肅•乜都揸正
>?>?>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>�
>>>>>>E
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>n
>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>h
>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>H
>>>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ㄜ鷲ike佢
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Nelson Fung教書好好 好過Tom Chan Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>Chan不如做番差人啦 教書不適合他
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>同意,不過可能是幾位5E學生
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>為何總是一口咬定是5E的人搞事呢?不可以是form1
>,
>>f
>>>o
>>>>r
>>>>>m
>>>>>>2
>>>>>>>,
>>>>>>>>f
>>>>>>>>>o
>>>>>>>>>>r
>>>>>>>>>>>m3嗎?一定是E班嗎?希望校友和同學們可以想清楚
>?>~
>>>�
>>>>U
>>>>>�
>>>>>>P
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>_
>>>>>>>>>>D人個個扮5E整, 影衰哂5E.
>>>>大家無evidence就唔好亂講.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>咁又係,你都講得幾有道理
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Tom Chan係咪教form6 chem?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>Tom Chan 會考好似有30分,勁人
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>係咪呀,我唔係幾信
>>>>>
>>>>>你係咪TOM CHAN打手AR.作到咁大,30分= =
>>>>
>>>>讀得好唔代表惜教書
>>>>30分大晒咩!!
>>>>教得唔好就唔好教la
>>>
>>>nelson教得最好
>>
>>Nelson really does a good job, but he uses Chinese in
>>his lessons.
>
>
>Why he can't use Chinese? That's good for students to
>learn Maths easily and will FULLY understanding on
>that topic.


佢教數教得勁好,生動,又concept勁
[> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> [> Subject: miss chung著衫有d出位...


Author:
新人
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 18:29:23 11/08/09 Sun

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>算啦, Tom Chan點講都有返工,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>唔似得有些人在學期中幾成時間都是放假.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>而且食髓知味!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係佢索性唔做好過.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan有返工又點,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>教得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>做得唔好,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我係Tom Chan就會做好d
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan 有次上堂講錯左chem
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>D野,跟住到考試個時,有一part
>>>好多人答錯,Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Chan係咁咦say
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>sorry,但就冇delete條問題,搞到好多負6的�
>H
>>?>?>>�
>>>>>�
>>>>>>!
>>>>>>>!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>我覺得唔算得囉,佢同姚sir一樣咁衰,姚sir之
>�
>>e
>>>�
>>>>�
>>>>>?>X
>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>?>?>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>d
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>d事
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>tom chan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>好鐘意小事化大•又難係嚴肅•乜都揸�
>�
>>?>?>>�
>>>>>�
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>E
>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>n
>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>h
>>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>H
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>ㄜ鷲ike佢
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Nelson Fung教書好好 好過Tom Chan Tom
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>Chan不如做番差人啦 教書不適合他
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>同意,不過可能是幾位5E學生
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>為何總是一口咬定是5E的人搞事呢?不可以是form
>1
>>,
>>>f
>>>>o
>>>>>r
>>>>>>m
>>>>>>>2
>>>>>>>>,
>>>>>>>>>f
>>>>>>>>>>o
>>>>>>>>>>>r
>>>>>>>>>>>>m3嗎?一定是E班嗎?希望校友和同學們可以想清�
>�
>>?>~
>>>>�
>>>>>U
>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>P
>>>>>>>>�
>>>>>>>>>_
>>>>>>>>>>>D人個個扮5E整, 影衰哂5E.
>>>>>大家無evidence就唔好亂講.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>咁又係,你都講得幾有道理
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>Tom Chan係咪教form6 chem?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>Tom Chan 會考好似有30分,勁人
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>係咪呀,我唔係幾信
>>>>>>
>>>>>>你係咪TOM CHAN打手AR.作到咁大,30分= =
>>>>>
>>>>>讀得好唔代表惜教書
>>>>>30分大晒咩!!
>>>>>教得唔好就唔好教la
>>>>
>>>>nelson教得最好
>>>
>>>Nelson really does a good job, but he uses Chinese in
>>>his lessons.
>>
>>
>>Why he can't use Chinese? That's good for students to
>>learn Maths easily and will FULLY understanding on
>>that topic.
>
>
>佢教數教得勁好,生動,又concept勁


miss chung著衫有d出位...算唔算有問題?


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+7
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2017 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.