VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1]2345678910 ]
Subject: Missing the point


Author:
No name
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 00:08:56 03/04/14 Tue
In reply to: 's message, "Crowning everyone" on 19:33:57 03/03/14 Mon

>>>>>>Ohio valley just posted their lineup and said they
>>>>are
>>>>>>crowning 4 teens. 3 from scores and one from
>>>>people's
>>>>>>choice. But with that many in teen the numbers
>>>>>>support it. With their numbers I say they will
>>also
>>>>>>crown 3 Miss.
>>>>>
>>>>>So one gets to buy her crown? How embarrassing.
>Just
>>>>>go at large for crying out loud. Cumberland gives
>>one
>>>>>to every girl who shows up in teen? Save the money
>>>and
>>>>>go at large.
>>>>
>>>>I think it's unique and a good way to find the
>>>>scholarship while sending someone to state. Who
>>knows
>>>>it could be a dark horse that ends up doing well at
>>>>the state level.
>>>>Besides, someone buys their way into top 10 in Miss
>>at
>>>>state. What's the difference?
>
>G
>>
>>
>>>
>>>its a complete joke at state too. No dark horse gets
>>>the title that didn't earn their way into it. A
>>>horrible no talent no interview girl can have a rich
>>>daddy.
>>>It completely waters down the integrity of the
>>>program. How about doing fundraising that isn't
>asking
>>>for more money from the girls and their families. Why
>>>is it scholarship if the families and friends give
>the
>>>money? Heck just hand it to your girl instead of
>>>taking the chance some other girl gets it. Go out and
>>>get real donors and scholarships instead of this
>>>piddly you can get a crown if you are " peoples"
>>>choice. It isn't peoples choice when money is
>>involved.
>>
>>
>>As a veteran who has aged out of the system, I can say
>>that I have saw in years past that at state the young
>>lady who made the top 10 as the Viewer’s choice went
>>on to do very well. She may not win, but she has
>>moved on and done well. As for the “rich daddy”
>>comment many of these young ladies (not speaking about
>>the OV prelim girls since I don’t know them) have went
>>out and asked for sponsors to vote or for ad sponsors.
>> It all goes into the scholarship fund that you or
>>your daughter could potentially win this year or next
>>year. I think it is a very creative way for a new
>>preliminary to raise funds to help pay the
>>scholarship. As for you saying it is not being the
>>people’s choice when money is involved- It is the
>>people’s choice if the contestant’s family and friends
>>wants to vote for her. I applaud them for being
>>willing to give and support their contestant and the
>>scholarship fund. Watering down the integrity of the
>>program? Do you forget if they want they can go at
>>large in teen? They don’t even have to win a
>>preliminary to go. So what’s the difference in them
>>doing this and going at large? Nothing. Other than
>>the fact that they have donated to a scholarship fund
>>on a local level and not state. Don’t like it? Don’t
>>vote. It is as simple as that. Besides, they have 13
>>girls and 3 advance on from the judges picks. It’s
>>not like they are crowning everyone like some. Your
>>comments and opinion is off. You should really do
>>research on the program that you are scolding one for
>>“watering down the integrity”. Let’s be honest, it’s
>>late in the season and some of these very girls and
>>more will show up at large anyway.
>
>Getting a crown because you bought it is much
>different than getting a chance to earn it by going
>into top ten. Going at large seems to water down as
>well. And I absolutely won't vote nor would I ever ask
>people I know to spend money to give a girl a crown.
>Again it's asking the friends and family of these
>girls to give money. They will have to ask again at
>the state level if they want to sell ads. Enough
>already it's a scholarship pageant they are there to
>win the scholarship not provide it. I thinks its sad
>and humiliating for a girl to purchase her crown
>whether it's her rich daddy or a combination of
>friends and family. Its still isn't the peoples choice
>when money is involved because you have to pay to
>vote. As far as I have seen the past few peoples
>choice winners did have wealthy parents.



You don't have to vote. That's your choice but you miss the point. Going at large is just as doing this. At least this way the girls entry is paid and I highly doubt that she will spend near on her "votes" as she would going at large. I'd rather put work into doing it this way than not trying at all and going at large.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
What's the big deal?No name00:38:32 03/04/14 Tue


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.