Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct: 
Feedback: 
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
| [ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ] |
| Subject: Fourth highest score vs more money | |
|
Author: No name |
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 21:35:56 03/04/14 Tue In reply to: 's message, "Correct" on 08:50:29 03/04/14 Tue >>>>>>Ohio valley just posted their lineup and said they >>>>are >>>>>>crowning 4 teens. 3 from scores and one from >>>>people's >>>>>>choice. But with that many in teen the numbers >>>>>>support it. With their numbers I say they will >>also >>>>>>crown 3 Miss. >>>>> >>>>>So one gets to buy her crown? How embarrassing. >Just >>>>>go at large for crying out loud. Cumberland gives >>one >>>>>to every girl who shows up in teen? Save the money >>>and >>>>>go at large. >>>> >>>>I think it's unique and a good way to find the >>>>scholarship while sending someone to state. Who >>knows >>>>it could be a dark horse that ends up doing well at >>>>the state level. >>>>Besides, someone buys their way into top 10 in Miss >>at >>>>state. What's the difference? >>> >>>its a complete joke at state too. No dark horse gets >>>the title that didn't earn their way into it. A >>>horrible no talent no interview girl can have a rich >>>daddy. >>>It completely waters down the integrity of the >>>program. How about doing fundraising that isn't >asking >>>for more money from the girls and their families. Why >>>is it scholarship if the families and friends give >the >>>money? Heck just hand it to your girl instead of >>>taking the chance some other girl gets it. Go out and >>>get real donors and scholarships instead of this >>>piddly you can get a crown if you are " peoples" >>>choice. It isn't peoples choice when money is >>involved. > > >My point exactly. Great post. They have went on and >did well. Sounds to me like someone didn't get the >votes she had hoped for. Has nothing to do with a >"rich daddy". It has everything to do with being a >person who I a kind, respected and puts the work in. >In this case that person may need a little extra >coaching to get there but this program is about growth >and I sure between now and state the young lady who >wins this crown will make great strides whomever she >is. There is absolutely no reason someone should have >such a negative outlook on this. It's rediculous. I think the difference here is peoples choice for a top ten spot and a CHANCE compete more and actually winning a crown for it vs put in enough money and get the crown. And it isn't a Miss Congeniality award for being nice and well liked it is for who put in the most money. Like it or not someone will get a crown because they paid the most vs three others who will get one because they had the high scores. Now, if you are the fourth highest girl that night and you didn't put in the most money how will you feel? Thats where the bad taste seems to come in to play for that one girl who doesn't have the money but had the scores. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] |
| Subject | Author | Date |
| Give it a rest. They added a title that wouldn't have been there anyway. | No name | 21:58:21 03/04/14 Tue |
|
||