VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time ]
Subject: I personally am in favor of the eligibility rules they have now. I think it’s great a YOUNG 30-35 year old can compete (because that’s still young). I think it’s great married women can compete, because they made a commitment to the love of their life. I have known women who compete for Miss USA AND Miss America that literally compete every year, have an engagement ring on their finger, and live with their fiance (or boyfriend) At least the married woman made a choice to be married and not play house with someone. Who care if they are married or not. Marriage shouldn’t define a woman’s life. There are PLENTY of married CEOs, married doctors, married lawyers, married movie stars. So what’s the issue of a pageant title holder being married? Most people I know who don’t like the inclusive eligibility rules are older women (or men) themselves.


Author:
No name
 		[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 12:02:32 10/02/25 Thu
Author Host/IP: syn-047-231-178-134.res.spectrum.com/47.231.178.134
In reply to: 's message, "Would They Crown Her" on 11:15:50 10/02/25 Thu
 N/a
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
There needs to be a new age/marital limit. It's MISS. Periodt. I don't see one of the marrieds winning, maybe top 5. (NT)No name
(NoHost/69.250.36.194)		12:25:20 10/02/25 Thu
    What does age have to do with marriage eligibility? I think it’s great they are inclusive. You learn so much in pageantry. Periodt. Who cares if they are older than 30? Most of the older candidates look just as good as the 25 year old. You can stay in your closed box. For me and my heart, I’ll support all women who want to better themselves. PERIODT.No name
    (syn-047-231-178-134.res.spectrum.com/47.231.178.134)    		14:41:55 10/02/25 Thu
    One might place only to send a message to encourage other married But that would take the place of someone who truly deserves it (NT)No name
    (196.sub-174-227-90.myvzw.com/174.227.90.196)    		16:01:06 10/08/25 Wed

    [ Login ] Create Account Not required to post.
    Post a public reply to this message | Go post a new public message
     * HTML allowed in marked fields.
    * Message subject (required):

    * Name (Registered users only):

      Expression (Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)

      E-mail address (optional):

    * Type your message here:

    Choose Message Icon: [ View Emoticons ]

    Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.

    [ Contact Forum Admin ]

    Forum timezone: GMT-5
    VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
    Before posting please read our privacy policy.
    VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
    Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.