Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
PayPal Acct:
Feedback:
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
|
| Subject: Yes. It is fair for the director to tell the judges no returners just like it is fair to tell them any other criteria for a contestant. If a returner fit the criteria that the director wanted, then she would have been chosen. Yes it is a transition but there is nothing "unfair" about this. The state director has ALWAYS had input into the winner whether we like it or not. | |
Author: the unfortunate truth | [ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
] Date Posted: 10:36:02 06/27/14 Fri In reply to: not fan of new director 's message, "Do you think it is ok to have the Director tell the judges no returners?" on 10:30:18 06/27/14 Fri [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] |
| [> [> [> [> Subject: saying something like "no returners" is like saying no brunettes or no minorities NOT what the director is asked to charge the judges with. They are told to tell the judges things like "we really want someone who will do well at miss america" or "we want a great STATE " titleholder. OR even "talent is not important to us" but they are not supposed to blatantly dismiss any contestants | |
|
Author: hope thats not how it went down [ Edit | View ] |
Date Posted: 13:29:05 06/27/14 Fri |
|
Forum timezone: GMT-8 VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB: Before posting please read our privacy policy. VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems. Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved. |