saying something like "no returners" is like saying no brunettes or no minorities NOT what the director is asked to charge the judges with. They are told to tell the judges things like "we really want someone who will do well at miss america" or "we want a great STATE " titleholder. OR even "talent is not important to us" but they are not supposed to blatantly dismiss any contestants -- Miss Arizona Message Board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, [5], 6 ]

Subject: saying something like "no returners" is like saying no brunettes or no minorities NOT what the director is asked to charge the judges with. They are told to tell the judges things like "we really want someone who will do well at miss america" or "we want a great STATE " titleholder. OR even "talent is not important to us" but they are not supposed to blatantly dismiss any contestants

Author:
hope thats not how it went down
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 13:29:05 06/27/14 Fri
In reply to: the unfortunate truth 's message, "Yes. It is fair for the director to tell the judges no returners just like it is fair to tell them any other criteria for a contestant. If a returner fit the criteria that the director wanted, then she would have been chosen. Yes it is a transition but there is nothing "unfair" about this. The state director has ALWAYS had input into the winner whether we like it or not." on 10:36:02 06/27/14 Fri

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums^(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.