VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2], 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 20:13:33 04/03/16 Sun
Author: He really thinks (by the numbers) that four people dying are worse than what we sustained during and after 9/11? What a raging lunatic.
Subject: Oh, but that doesn't count! That happened almost 100 years ago! Bush, Bush, Bush!
In reply to: Any answer less than 4,000 will be graded with an F 's message, "You stupid shit, you are actually going to try to blame Clinton for those four guys? OK BUBBLES! 'Four People Dead On Her Watch'
Now if that is the standard... if anyone that dies is the fault of who ever's 'watch' it was... then riddle me this:

How Many People Died On George Bush's Watch?

" on 04:41:59 04/03/16 Sun


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.