VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 04:24:04 12/31/99 Fri
Author: Anonymous
Subject: Re: Robert Anton Wilson
In reply to: 's message, "Re: Robert Anton Wilson" on 17:58:59 09/22/99 Wed

> > ...and for robert anton wilson, i've read some of his
> > works, and really can't say that i'm too impressed.
> > w.
>
> Which works have you read? I've read quite a few
> books by him (or at least started them), and I would
> agree, most of them aren't very impressive. The
> Historical Illuminatus Trilogy (of which I can only
> find the 1st & 2nd parts) is one of the better ones
> tho'. Don't confuse it with his Illuminati! Trilogy
> written with Robert Shea -- my friend and I joke about
> how that book appears to have been 'written' by
> placing each chapter, cut into individual paragraphs,
> into a hat where the Roberts took turns picking
> paragraphs with their eyes closed, and gluing them
> onto the pages. The Historical Illuminatus, on the
> other hand, is entertaining even without the
> conspiratorial overtones.
>
> I also liked his one book that listed various
> conspiracy theories -- plausible or otherwise -- he
> has come across while researching his numerous
> writings. I cannot remember the title at the moment,
> but it was fairly interesting. Some of the theories
> were pretty humerous (John Hinckley (sp?) was really
> an android programmed to kill Pres. Reagan was quite
> funny).
>
> -s138
The number 23 is a valid egnima. It was discovered by William Burroughs. RAW discovered that it was synchronous with the number 17. Validity?
This is what I discovered. IF:

A,I,J,Y and Q each = 1
B,K,R = 2
C,G,L,S = 3
D,M,T = 4
H,E,N = 5
U,V,W = 6
Z,O = 7
F,P = 8

Then by adding the values of the letters of a word we get the 'number' of that word, such as;

MOON[23] EARTH[17]
HORUS[23] OSIRIS[17]
YAHWEH[23] Y'H'W'H[17]
JOSHUA[23] J'H'V'H[17]
BACCHUS[23] WINE[17]
WODAN[23] ODIN[17]
VOTAN[23] HIVIM[17]

CLOVIS[23] [17]INDIAN
SIOUX[23] [17]INDIAN
NORTH[23] [17]AMERICA
CENTRAL[23] [17]AMERICA

more???

The MOON[23]
GEYAGUGA[23
HECATE[23]
DYKTINNA[23]
MWEZI[23]

and more here also!

Be advised, you are among the first of the human race to recieve this information, even if it is just a coincident.

Maybe you missed the purpose of Wilson's work.

Cheers and Happy New Years,

[2^3+3^2]

MATHRA

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.