VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, [3], 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 17:50:32 05/14/02 Tue
Author: Sparky
Subject: Re: Spoken like a true NG stooge!
In reply to: Chazman 's message, "Spoken like a true NG stooge!" on 14:04:34 05/14/02 Tue

>Only an injured party, or the legal guardian or next
>of kin of an injured party can file a law suit. If
>there is no injured party, there is no suit. Unless
>Jack K was going out and buying a set of these sticks
>he cannot be an injured party. Got that now?

Then why don't he go out and buy a set and become the injured party so he himself can file a suit instead of asking others to do it for him? You're not that bright are you?

>I have the complete "hard copy" of the patent, and you
>know what, Jack just may do that! Of course since the
>club isn't as per the design in the patent, and the
>swing isn't either, the patent is completely
>unenforcible as far as NG taking any action against
>someone.

What? If NG is violating the patent why would they bring action against someone else for their own(NG) patent voilation? Your so ignorant and confused as to what's going on you don't even know what your saying.

>Jack's got a giant hard on for NG, that sure is the
>case, but, that doesn't alter the FACT that the
>allegations he is bringing against them are 100% true!
>If they weren't NG would be suing him, wouldn't they?

Suing him for what? Reread the page from Kuykendalls' web site. He says they placed his patient # on their clubs and asked golfers who feel they were mislead to look into their legal rights. He never says any of this was illegal, he implied it may have mislead people. Explains why HE isn't suing them and they aren't suing him.

The clubs and swing are covered under the same patent because Kuykendall patented the whole system. If NG changes the club head style but still claims the clubs are specially designed for the NG swing they're still covered under the same patent #. If the clubhead themselves were covered under a DESIGN PATENT they would be in viloation. Again, explains why Kuykendall isn't suing and is asking others to risk their money on a suit.

>So trying out different things to see what's best is
>now considered bieng stupid? Funny thing, I tried them
>all and NG as taught by Tom Sanders, (now BGG) is the
>best, so that makes me real stupid I guess!

I suppose so considering you tried them thinking they were going to do what they claimed.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT-5
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.