Name (Registered users only):

  Expression ^{(Optional mood/title along with your name) Examples: (happy, sad, The Joyful, etc.) help)}

  E-mail address (optional):

* Type your message here:
>Hi again, Lucas, > >> >>I think the actor (blue T-shirt kid) not yelping is >>intentional. This spanking is a stinging one. Bad >>enuff to leave him sore temporarily. But it's not a >>super severe one. Belt spankings and cane spankings >>have relatively limited numbers of whacks, so they >>need force behind the whacks in order to achieve a >>really severe butt blistering. > >>So belt spankings over >>the knee probably aren't often very severe. > >Mine sure were!! >> >>Even if it isn't the case for you and me, I think it >>is possible for a spanking to be effective even >>without it resulting in any yelps from the boy >>receiving it. > >I wonder what my folks would think of me giving them >the silent treatment getting spanked. It's much too >likely that they would assume it's not hurting and >give it harder (if that's even possible), or maybe >longer, too. Also I <i>do</I> try not to yell when >my mom is giving it to me OTK in the kitchen so the >neighbor lady doesn't hear. Major inducement for that >but to no avail, by the time the third swat lands I'm >screaming > >I think one or two people who post here >>have mentioned receiving a big spanking without >>yelping or crying. > >Mr. PP (miss him) said that his two boys took their >lexan paddlings without crying. He mentioned >something about British/New Zealand tradition of >"keeping a stiff upper lip". More power to y'all - I >admire your ability to do that. I would sure make a >pretty poor British teenager (but you already know >that). > >The caning in P'tang, Yang, >>Kipperbang (not a severe caning) produces no yelps >>from the recipient. And I think there are several >>other portrayals (also based on real life) that are >>similar. > >Yeah, but these are movies. The actors do what the >director tells them to do. It is not evidence of >reality. >> >>I have to agree that it's got to be difficult telling >>the difference in sound between a belting over undies >>and a belting on a bare bottom. Depending on the >>underwear worn, most of the area hit by the belt will >>still be bare skin anyway. > >More importantly, the high fidelity quality of one's >computer speakers is of overwhelming importance here. >I'm lucky if my 1" diameter laptop speakers even make >a sound at all and even my desktop's El Cheapo Koss >outboards don't let me tell the difference between a >violin playing low notes and a cello playing high >ones. It takes my high-fidelity stereo headphone >system to be able to tell the difference between a >violin and a viola playing a duet. And my grandpa's >professional Sennheiser HD 800 S headphones even let >me hear the individual string vibrations of the double >basses. I'm sure it would take something like them to >be able to tell the difference between underpants and >skin. We would need two CD-quality audio clips, one >of a belt on undies and another of belt on skin to >A/B the two and see. Can you come up with two such >clips? > >>It's interesting to speculate about what the movie >>producers wanted us to imagine and what they chose to >>show. > >Also have to factor in what the censors would allow to >be portrayed and/or the director's ability to show >same. > > I think them showing the jeans coming down is >>intended to emphasise the vulnerability of the boy and >>also show that he's submitting to his punishment. They >>don't seem to want to emphasise embarrassment - which >>would be the effect if he has to take down his undies >>while his sister is watching the whole thing. > >Fair point. Otherwise they would have shown the >undies coming down along with the trousers. > >The focus is on how sore his bottom is going to be, not >>embarrassment. (As shown by his sister gloating >>specifically about how much pain he's going to be in.) >> >>I do think there's a slight hole in credibility that >>the kid submits to his spanking with so little >>protest. > >Yeah, well, as my dad often says when suspending your >disbelief at a scene becomes impossible, "The script >called for it." > >> maybe this is something that >>happens a lot and it has happened in the past that >>he's protested his innocence and got extra spanks for >>it. So he knows he just has to accept it. > >I can believe that vis-à-vis the father, but not the >sister. I don't have a sister (hallelujah) but if I >had <i>that</i> one I'd sure have something to say to >her other than "Go away"! Probably accompanied by a >fist - If I'm going to get the belt it might as well >be for a sheep as a lamb. >> >>There does seem to be some bias in the family. Firstly >>in the way that his parents automatically believe his >>sister and don't let him give his side of the story. >>Second that they let his sister watch the spanking >>(bare bottom or not) with a close up view even tho >>she's obviously gloating about it. That must be fairly >>unusual even for parents that spank. > >That may be a major point of the movie. >> >> >>I also prefer the first half of this short movie not >>the ending. To me it's most amusing for him to get >>this spanking knowing that it's all because of his >>sister wanting to see him get the belt. So I think it >>would've been funnier if the parents hadn't found out >>the truth. > >LUCAS!! That's just cruel! There is nothing funny >about this movie. Also, if the girl hadn't let the >cat out of the bag would we have even known the boy >didn't throw it in as charged? > >> >>In fairness I should mention that *some* beltings over >>the knee apparently can be quite severe. > >I'll testify to that!!! > >-Jerry
Choose Message Icon: None :-) Happy ;-) Wink :-D Joy :} Smirk <:-} Innocent ☮ Peace >:) Mischief B-) Shades <3 Heart |O Yawn <:P Sick >:-( Angry :~( Sad ? Question *!* Alert Thumbs Up Thumbs Down (!) Idea [Info] Info Oo. Talk [ View Emoticons ]

Notice: Copies of your message may remain on this and other systems on internet. Please be respectful.