Date Posted:11:43 Author: andre-9Jan02 Subject: Re: Norman Paulsen's Rainbow Theory In reply to:
Eponymous-3Jan02
's message, "Re: Norman Paulsen's Rainbow Theory" on 11:42
An example of blind reasoning is to think you have made an accurate conclusion that is based 100% in truth that you can difidently vouch for its authenticity. Such an example would be of Ketch and others saying that Norman is to be considered a crazy when they havent lived his life and experienced what he may well have experienced. If they just dont know for damn sure, how can they be so sure they are right and go so far as to discourage others from being interested in his life? They should at least say, "I cant really say for sure if what he says is true or not, I dont know, I havent experienced that. It sounds crazy to me but thats my opinion only and I cant prove hes crazy just as I cant prove he's right."
