Ananda and NTLA article -- KRIYA YOGA DISCUSSION BOARD

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10:49
Author: Wondering 29 Aug 2001
Subject: Ananda and NTLA article

When I read the NTLA article I found it strange that the Ananda ad was placed next to it.
Anyway, at the time I thought it was very unliklely that anybody at Ananda would want
these things to be said about Yogananda. Now, I have heard some folks from Ananda claim that
it was a mistake - that they had no idea the article was going to be of that nature. However,
in Kriyananda's rebuttal to the NTLA article he states very clearly that he had discussions
with the author concerning the allegations of the article before it was published. So it seems to me
that Kriyananda must have had a good idea of what would be the nature of the article. In his rebuttal
Kriyananda even states that he would no longer advertise in the NTLA if such a slanderous article was published.
In light of this why didn't Ananda pull the ad? After Kriyananda's interview with the author I don't think much
imagination was required on his part to conclude what the nature of the article would be. Anyway, I would appreciate
it if anybody from Ananda (or anyone else) could provide me with some explanation. It does seem very strange and
the claim of ignorance of the nature of the article just doesn't seem very believable. On the otherhand I find it
hard to believe that Kriyananda or anyone at Ananda would wish for these things to be said about Yogananda.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Ananda and NTLA article -- Yogananda Devotee - 29 Aug 2001, 10:50
- Re: Ananda and NTLA article -- Wondering - 29 Aug 2001, 10:51
  - Re: Ananda and NTLA article -- Yogananda Devotee - 29 Aug 2001, 10:52
    - Re: Ananda and NTLA article -- Wondering - 29 Aug 2001, 10:53
      - Re: Ananda and NTLA article -- Yogananda Devotee - 29 Aug 2001, 10:55
        Re: Ananda and NTLA article -- ketch - 30 Aug 2001, 10:57
        Re: Ananda and NTLA article -- Yogananda Devotee - 30 Aug 2001, 10:55
        Re: Ananda and NTLA article -- ketch - 30 Aug 2001, 10:56
        Re: Ananda and NTLA article -- Yogananda Devotee - 31 Aug 2001, 10:58
        Re: Ananda and NTLA article -- ketch - 31 Aug 2001, 11:00
        Re: Ananda and NTLA article -- ketch - 2 Sep 2001, 11:01
        Re: Deleted Post -- How True - 4 Sep 2001, 11:04
        Re: Deleted Post -- ketch - 4 Sep 2001, 11:05
        Re: Deleted Post -- How True - 4 Sep 2001, 11:07
        Re: Deleted Post -- ketch - 5 Sep 2001, 11:10
        Re: Ananda and NTLA article -- Jimminy Cricket - 2 Sep 2001, 11:29
        Re: Ananda and NTLA article -- Yogananda Devotee - 31 Aug 2001, 11:30
        Re:You're wasting your time -- Anonymous - 31 Aug 2001, 11:31
        Re: Ananda and NTLA article -- Wondering - 30 Aug 2001, 11:33
        Re: Ananda and NTLA article -- Yogananda Devotee - 30 Aug 2001, 11:35
        Re: Ananda and NTLA article -- Anonymous - 30 Aug 2001, 11:35
Re(5): Deleted Post -- How True - 5 Sep 2001, 11:13
- Re: Re(5): Deleted Post -- Jimminy Cricket - 6 Sep 2001, 11:14
  - Re: Re(5): Deleted Post -- How True - 6 Sep 2001, 11:16
    - Re: Re(5): Deleted Post -- Jimminy Cricket - 6 Sept 2001, 11:17
      - Re: Re(5): Deleted Post -- How True - 6 Sep 2001, 11:19
        Re: Re(5): Deleted Post -- Jimminy Cricket - 6 Sep 2001, 11:20
        Re: Re(5): Deleted Post -- How True - 6 Sep 2001, 11:23
        Re: Re(5): Deleted Post -- Jimminy Cricket - 7 Sep 2001, 11:24
        Re: Re(5): Deleted Post -- How True - 7 Sep 2001, 11:26
        Re: Re(5): Deleted Post -- ketch - 7 Sep 2001, 11:27