VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, [4], 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 07:28
Author: dwayanu - 15 May 2002
Subject: Re: Mu/Atlantis continued
In reply to: ketch - 15 May 2002 's message, "Re: Mu/Atlantis continued" on 07:27

Let us not get ahead of ourselves here. I have not done a turn about at all. I was merely trying to make sure that you understood what I was saying. When I said previously that the ice age ended suddenly, I just wanted to be sure that you did think that I thought that meant that all of the ice suddenly disappeared. It was the conditions conducive to an ice age that suddenly changed.
As far as the existence of Mu and Atlantis, as I explained earlier, before offering evidence about their existence, I thought it appropriate to address your position that it was impossible for them to have existed because there was been no cataclysm 12000 years ago that could have destroyed them. So, first things first.
First I am showing that in fact there was a cataclysm (or two -- five hundred years apart) approx. 12000 years ago. That is what my last post addresses.
In addition to the information in my last post, you might also at look Barbara Hand-Chow's work, where she says, "Scientific data convergence points to a global catastrophe around 9500 BC."
Now that it is established that there in fact was a cataclysm (or two) that could have destroyed Mu and Atlantis at about the time that Paulsen presents, and not only destroyed them by any means, but specifically by impacts from outer space, I will move on in my next post to discuss evidence of their existence.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]

Forum timezone: GMT+0
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.