Create a New Forum Admin Login Member Login Contribute to Voyager Search VoyForums Help Desk VoyForums Exchange VoyForums Directory/Categories VoyForums Homepage VoyForums News FAQ - Frequently Asked Questions

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: [1], 2 ]

Subject: Re: Food for Thought Author: Elli [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ] Date Posted: 12:27:50 04/09/02 Tue In reply to: donnap 's message, "Re: Food for Thought" on 20:55:52 04/08/02 Mon Sorry Don, but it is not enough, not by a long shot. I probably know more about the trial and this case than all of you. No, I was not allowed into the courtroom, but I did have people there taking notes, and people taping SNN. If anyone here has a biased view that would be you Don. You have bought into all the pre-trial publicity that Ralf was guilty. I'm not even gong to try and convice you of his innocence because your mind is made up. That's ok, you have a right to your opinion. However I will not keep quiet as long as my husband is behind bars for something he did not do. As for being convicted by a jury of his peers, juries make mistakes. This jury did, not that I entirely blame them, as they were swayed by a strong media push to convict Ralf. But thankfully appelate judges rule on the law and not what is portrayed by the media. It is on the law that Ralf will get a new trial. Although I have not known Geoff that long, I do think I know him better than you Don. I have spent hours talking with Geoff and his team, and when Geoff says he will be there for Ralf when a new trial is scheduled then I beleive that he will keep his promise. If you are going to keep coming here than get used to my posts, they are not going stop just because you don't agree, anymore than I expect you to stop posting because I don't agree with you. After all diversity makes the world go around. Looking forward to your next post Don. [ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Subject Author Date Re: Food for Thought Nettie 14:53:21 04/09/02 Tue Re: Food for Thought -- Elli, 18:02:00 04/09/02 Tue Re: Food for Thought -- Nettie, 18:20:44 04/09/02 Tue Re: Food for Thought -- Elli, 01:07:05 04/10/02 Wed Re: Food for Thought -- Nettie, 09:56:45 04/10/02 Wed Re: Food for Thought -- Elli, 10:46:00 04/10/02 Wed Re: Food for Thought -- Chris, 11:59:58 04/10/02 Wed