Re: Comment on Delusional Relgious Teachings --Name Some -- Mamusz' Restoration Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, [10] ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 21:16:18 03/05/11 Sat
Author: Lois
Subject: Re: Comment on Delusional Relgious Teachings --Name Some
In reply to: George 's message, "Re: Comment on Delusional Relgious Teachings --Name Some" on 19:14:38 03/05/11 Sat

>>>>I have several times commented that there are
>certain
>>>>things that people consciously deny because they
>just
>>>>don't want to believe it. That said, I will not cite
>>>>any specific examples of such claimed disbelief.
>>>>
>>>>I'll just quote the passage from the Book of Mormon
>>>>that illustrates this idea:
>>>>
>>>>But behold, I have all things as a testimony that
>>>>these things are true; and ye also have all things
>as
>>>>a testimony unto yoyu that they are true; and will
>ye
>>>>deny them? Belioevest thou that these things are
>>true?
>>>>Behold, I knnow that thou believest, but thou art
>>>>possessed with a lying spirit, and ye have put off
>>the
>>>>Spirit of God, that it may have no place in you; but
>>>>the devil hath power over you, and he doth carry you
>>>>about, working devices, that he may destroy the
>>>>children of God.
>>>>
>>>>Alma 16:49-51 (LDS 30:41-42)
>>>>
>>>>Behavior or speech that is contradictory to what
>>>>someone claims to be truth is a sure sign of an
>>>>unconscious conviction that can't be consciously
>>>>overthrown, regardless of what one chooses to say or
>>>>do.
>>>>
>>>>George
>>>
>>>
>>>Perhaps some of us can post examples of past, or
>>>current philosphies or Christian doctrines whose
>>>adherents have plainly demonstrated that they do not,
>>>in fact, actually believe these philosophies or
>>>doctrines in their heart of hearts, but merely
>shuffle
>>>them around in conscious thought and speech to make
>>>disobedience to the real truth bearable for them.
>>>
>>>George
>>
>>George,
>>
>>I don't know exactly what you are asking. I think you
>>are asking for forms of hypocrisy. In other words,
>>what are "Christians" publicly proclaiming, while in
>>fact practicing the opposite.
>>
>>I think it is truly hypocritical to claim to be
>>passionate about Jesus, and then not be able to answer
>>a simple question about Him. Here is the question, "Do
>>you believe that Jesus Christ is the Only way to
>>salvation? Please answer "yes", "no" or "I don't
>know".
>>
>>This simple question has caused the most absurd verbal
>>acrobatics from some people who claim to be passionate
>>about Jesus Christ. I call that hypocrisy.
>>
>>Why the acrobatics? Because some worldly person,
>>persons, or institution is listening to the answer
>>that might be given.
>>
>>Here is another example. Some people claim that they
>>believe in the scriptures, and also claim that, yes
>>indeed, homosexual acts are a sin. But ask them to
>>comment on an agenda in which it is about to be made
>>an official part of the church. Suddenly they can't
>>comment. Why? Because some worldly person, persons, or
>>institution is listening to the answer that might be
>>given.
>>
>>Oh, I almost forgot this one. "Thou shalt not judge."
>>The very people who spout that one are the most
>>judgmental people I have ever known. Just give an
>>opinion contrary to theirs and see what names they
>>will call you.
>>
>>Lois
>>
>Lois, I'm referring to the situation of the person who
>subconsciously knows that something is true, but
>denies it during his waking hours in order to
>rationalize his behavior. You recall the scripture "A
>double-minded man is unstable in all his ways." There
>are plenty of people who think that they are perfectly
>respectable and mentally healthy, but the split
>between what they know deep down inside to be true,
>and the ersatz truth they use during waking hours to
>rationalize their behavior makes them psychiatric
>cases.
>
>For instance, anyone (particularly in the priesthood,)
>knows that if the Book of Mormon is not historically
>true, that Joseph Smith, Jr. was a liar. Orson Pratt
>himself pretty much said that if the BoM is true, no
>one can dismiss it and be saved. If it is not true, it
>is one of the most evil things ever concocted, and no
>one can be saved and subscribe to it. Members of all
>Restoration churches know this unconsciously, but the
>ones who want to become liberal and enlightened
>without giving up their family's faith have to find a
>way to endure this split between real deep-down
>knowledge and conscious rationalization.
>
>From time to time I have had to make metal castings in
>the laboratory. When the casting is warped or has
>internal tension, it is very stressed and likely to
>break under pressure. People who try to live their
>lives with this split between what they know is the
>truth, and what they pretend is true, have that
>internal stress that causes all kinds of insane
>behavior. I think this difficult is the root cause of
>all the division inside the RLDS Church. Those who
>have internally converted to a belief that the BoM and
>the Restored Church is inherently false try to keep
>practicing the faith, and their efforts become so
>warped that all this craziness that we see going on
>nowadays results.
>
>George

George,

I think I see what you mean. It never ceases to amaze me that some of the people in the church who claim that the Book of Mormon is a good book but not necessarily true, and that Joseph Smith Jr. is a real problem to the Restoration, and that the additions in the Inspired Version are just fairy tales or something, can BRAG about how many generations their family has been in the church!!

If everything the church used to teach is false, then why would a person BRAG about how many generations their family has been in the church? Oh, right. The reason they brag is because they think that somehow their family's heritage in the church gives them the right to rule all the "lesser" peoples.

It is kind of psychotic.

Lois

THE NEW CURRICULUM: PROJECTED PRECEDURES AND SCHEDULINGPrepared by the Church School Division,
Department of Religious Education
September, 1967, Pages 4-5

As we involve ourselves in the task of working with our writers, the positions set forth in the papers will give needed guidance to them as they attempt to translate the intent of the curriculum into actual lesson materials. This does not mean, however, that the study papers themselves will be made available to the writers. Each writer, in his relationship to an editor and in the light of the nature of his special assignment, will constitute a particular situation, and how the intent of curriculum is interpreted to the writer will be determined in large measure by the particularity of that relationship. As a general rule, we state that basicly these study papers are not intended for general circulation.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: Comment on Delusional Relgious Teachings --Name Some -- George, 23:16:51 03/05/11 Sat