Re: A Recommendation To Promote Understanding -- Mamusz' Restoration Forum

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, [6], 7, 8, 9, 10 ]

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 10:22:23 08/12/11 Fri
Author: Lois
Subject: Re: A Recommendation To Promote Understanding
In reply to: George 's message, "A Recommendation To Promote Understanding" on 07:19:21 08/12/11 Fri

>I feel rather challenged, common-sense wise, after the
>last exchange with John. What led to my resignation
>from the church was the abominable way that the church
>computer network is operated.
>
>It occurred to me that a lot of the hurt feelings and
>anger generated in the miscommunication between
>individuals and HDQ may be due to the persons running
>the computer system. After all, if they can make forum
>posts and threads disappear, they can make emails
>disappear, too.
>
>If you have something that is bothering you regarding
>the church administration, do not trust
>communication to email. In the soap opera politics of
>the church, if the operator(s) of the network don't
>like what you are talking about, they can interrupt
>communication.
>
>For instance, if you wish to write the president to
>ask him to intervene in the silencing of a priest,
>just write a good old letter. Federal law prohibits
>monkeying with the mail system. If the network
>operator(s) suspect that the silenced priest is a
>Christian, he/she/they/TG might just make your email
>disappear to make you think that the president didn't
>even want to answer your email.
>
>John's perfect confidence in assuming that I never
>received any reply whatsoever from Dr. Smith is
>what tipped me off to this.
>
>George

Sometime between 1985 and 1988 I wrote a letter to Wallace B. Smith and someone else, one of the apostles I believe. I always figured some underling would have consigned it to file 13, the shredder. Contempt for the prophet began as early as 1962 by the seventy.

Lois

What this all means is that the church started in 1860 by Joseph Smith, III (As the Communitarian leadership now claims it began) no longer believes that a man can be born designated by God as a prophet, and has switched to believing that a man can be born designated by God to be a homosexual.(George)

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

Re: A Recommendation To Promote Understanding -- George, 16:18:07 08/12/11 Fri