VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123[4]5678910 ]


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 12:11:55 06/19/00 Mon
Author: Islandgirl
Subject: Re: Is En Ami the answer to Requiem?
In reply to: detoured 's message, "Is En Ami the answer to Requiem?" on 23:57:56 06/18/00 Sun

Well, unless something happens during Season 8 that conclusively *PROVES* otherwise, I'm sticking with my theory that the baby was conceived naturally during "all things". So I don't think CSM implanted an alien embryo in Scully.
However, that still leaves the question of "How did Scully regain her fertility?" There are three possible explanations for this, as far as I can see:
1.) Your theory of CSM reimplanting Scully's ova during "En Ami". Right now, I think this is most likely the correct theory. Now that we've seen "all things" and "Requiem", certain comments CSM made during "EA" make more sense.
2.) Scully sort of healed herself by thinking happy thoughts and letting go of negative vibes. This seemed to be the underlying message of "all things" — it was how both Colleen and Daniel solved their health problems when traditional medicine failed them.
3.) Scully was never infertile in the first place; it was either a mistake or something the Consortium paid off/threatened her doctors into telling her. I seem to be the only one who subscribes to this theory, but I think there are a couple of things to support it. The first is Teresa (from "Pilot" and "Requiem"). Teresa was both a multiple-abductee and the mother of a baby. This shoots down the theory advanced in "Memento Mori" and other eps that once a woman is abducted she's left barren. (Maybe it has to do with the number of abductions, the age at which she was abudcuted, etc.) The other thing that kinda/sorta supports this theory (at least IMHO) is this. . .Scully was abducted early in Season Two. She was apparently shocked to realize, late in Season Four, that she was infertile. (Early in Season 4, during "Home", she spoke of having children as if she saw no reason why it might not be possible for her.) Without going into too much detail, don't most of you ladies think that if she had been completely barren for over two years, it would have led to the cessation of a certain monthly event? Don't you think she would have noticed? Finally, let's remember that Scully had apparently not put her fertility to the test at anytime between her abduction and the events of "all things"!

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Replies:



Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.