[ Show ]
[ Shrink ]
Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor
of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users'
privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your
privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket
to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we
also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.
Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your
contribution is not tax-deductible.)
Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):
[ Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 23:00:43 03/18/03 Tue
Author: So Cal Susan
Subject: Re: The Blade, the Vatican, and The Maid: Questions in need of some insight, some speculation
In reply to:
's message, "The Blade, the Vatican, and The Maid: Questions in need of some insight, some speculation" on 13:30:15 03/18/03 Tue
Can always rely on Ph0tog for the interesting questions...
>1.) Joan of Arc was burned at the stake in 1431, the
>Vatican claimed the Blade after that, only letting it
>out "in dire situations" for the next 500 years
>(1931), per Msgnr. Bellamy in "Legion," at which time
>it was given to Hitler to seal a pre-war deal with the
>then-Pope. Then, the Vatican wanted the Blade back,
>knew that Pez had it.
>In the interim between 1931 and Pez, (do you suppose)
>did the Vatican pursue its 'recapture'? Do you imagine
>that KI had a "deal" of his own with the Vatican, or
>is Irons just too big for even the Vatican to take on,
>in demanding the Blade's return? Or, only that the
>Vatican was not pleased with Pez having it, but might
>have settled had it come to be on someone else's wrist?
I think the Vatican may have even had a deal with Irons about the Blade. I mean if any one can broker a deal with the Vatican, it would be KI! :-)
Since the Blade was 'stolen' out of the archives of the Vatican, perhaps the Church wanted to see what would be done with it and for what purpose so they did not try to retrieve it right away.
Also, it was never determined that the Vatican was actually trying to retrieve, since Father Del Toro was not really "working" for the Church but other sinster forces that perhaps wanted the Blade for it's own endgame.
>2.) Joan of Arc was burned at the stake in 1431, by
>all accounts (at least ones that I know of) childless.
>The Blade (in the TV-verse, anyway) follows a certain
>bloodline, yes? Well, 500 years later, how does Joan
>manage to have offspring (Bronte and then Pez)?
>Or, was Joan not a true wielder (though we see her
>with Pez's face), and bloodline the Blade follows is
>Or, must we believe either, a.) the line it followed
>is Joan's, but an indirect line, as that of a brother
>or sister of hers, OR, b.) that Joan had a child,
>about whom history is silent?
I believe it was determined that there are different weilder bloodlines...not all related to one another. As EB said, "we are related but not in the way that you think". So I think that there are different "possibilities" of certain women in those bloodlines to become the Weilder but she has to be "tested" and proven worthy to wear it.
*wondering if any of this rambling actually answered Ph0tog's inquiries...*
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
[ Contact Forum Admin ]
Forum timezone: GMT-8|
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.