VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1[2]3 ]
Subject: RE: Buells


Author:
Old School
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 17:18:53 10/17/02 Thu
In reply to: Phil 's message, "Re: BUELLS" on 23:55:23 10/16/02 Wed

Painfully well put. It's a shame, too. You WANT them to do well, but Buell keeps depending on a formula that only works for Harley. For whatever reason Eric Buell refuses to ebrace technology for the motor; the rest of the concept is open for debate, but the motor is not: it's weak, and quite probably unbuildable. Hopefully one day the Buell Ostritch will remove its head from the sand...if they're still around. Anyway Phil, accurately said; I would say "nice shot" but the term 'fish in a bucket' comes to mind. :)

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
Re: RE: Buellsdanno21:24:40 10/17/02 Thu


[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-6
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.