VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12[3]4 ]
Subject: Post 352 A: JPD - 04, A New Monarchy, part 2


Author:
teltalheart/moderator
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 22:34:51 01/18/15 Sun
Author Host/IP: 98-159-196-245.scottsboro.org/98.159.196.245

Post 352 A: JPD - 04, A New Monarchy, part 2

As has been stated on Post 350 A: and 351 A:, It is now obvious that due to the revelations of The Guardian: "Questions raised over Queen's ancestry after DNA test on Richard III's cousin's." Queen Elizabeth II's right to rule is obviously in question as the true monarch of Britain. After the battle of Bosworth, 1485, and death of Richard III, the Tudors used their descent from John of Gaunt, son of Edward III and father of Henry IV, to claim title to the throne of England.

With the revelation that the Y-DNA of John of Gaunt didn't make it down to the present Duke of Beaufort's line, close cousins of Elizabeth II. Still Elizabeth II has many lines with many noble lineages. Even if the line from John of Gaunt has proven not to be present and makes that line and any claim to the throne through it illegitimate. The most obvious of Elizabeth II's claims would be to the Royal House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha. It is a German Noble House and title. It's just to bad that King George V of England felt he had the right, one still wonders from where, to have his subject nobles renounce any German titles they may have had after 1918 and the end of WWI. It may have been one pillar Elizabeth II could have stood upon as a claim to the English throne. Like a shakspearian tale, hoisted by one's own family petard.

She may yet have a claim to Scotland, as a descendant of Mary Queen of Scots. Even if the line is illegitimate if Henry Stewart, Lord Darnley proves to not be the father on James VI of Scotland - I of England, as I suspect. She does have a descent through Margaret, daughter of the King Christian I of Norway, Sweden and Denmark, (as does ourself), wife of James III of Scotland.

No matter what the British 'Royals' have done to our family line we are not without compassion for our dear cousins plight. Our Dear cousin will always have a place amongst the nobles of the Grand Principality and Grand Archduchy of Doggerland. On the first publishing of part 1 on 23:55:40 01/09/15 of Post 352 A:, we had announced our dear cousin would be ennobled as a Countess in Doggerland. That is still the case and should be considered as such.

End post 352 A: part 2, teltalheart is Sir Michael D. Barnes, Grand Prince and Grand Archduke of Doggerland.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]



Forum timezone: GMT-6
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.