Author:
teltalheart/moderator
|
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
Date Posted: 23:09:31 06/26/11 Sun
Author Host/IP: 98-159-200-219.scottsboro.org/98.159.200.219
Post 276 A: Perer, Ferrer / Norman or old Breton
To begin with about my previous post 275 A:, the Normans (Northmen) Vikings were indeed a thieving, robbing, raping, murdering group back then between the 8th and 11th centuries. But, it is also a true that 98.9% of us descended from western European stock have their DNA in us as part of our ancestry. My Puryear (Perrier, Perers) may very well be the line of Ferrers; as in Henry de Ferrers, a Norman knight from the baronial family from Ferrieres St. Hilary, near Bernai, Normandy. In fact an allegory between the separation of the common named families of Perers and Ferrers may have been written of in Geoffrey of Monmouth's book 'THE HISTORY OF THE KINGS OF BRITAIN.'However, they could also possibly be old Breton as well.
In part two of his book the chapter 'Before The Romans Came' Geoffrey writes:
"After the death of Cunedagius, his son Rivallo succeeded him, a peaceful, prosperous young man who ruled the kingdom frugally." (One wonders if this could have been Riwal a.k.a Rivallous a.k.a. Hoel I King of the Bretons and founder of Domnonee or Dumnonia abt.520 A.D. in Brittany France; this would also be the ancestor of Budic Count of Cornouailles ca.900, whose younger son, Periou, is said to be the ancestor of the family Perer, Perrier, Purrier, Purryer, Puryer etc.). "In his time it rained blood for three days and men died from the flies which swarmed. Rivallo's son Gurgustius succeeded him. Sisillius came after Gurgustius, then Jago the nephew of Gurgustius, then Kimarcus the son of Sisillius and after him Gorboduc." (Budic?). "Two sons were born to Gorboduc, one called Ferrex and the other Porrex. When their father became senile, a quarrel arose between these two as to which should succeed the old man on the throne. Porrex was the more grasping of the two and he planned to kill his brother by setting an ambush for him. When Ferrex learned of this he escaped from his brother by crossing the sea to Gaul. With the support of Suhard, King of the Franks, Ferrex returned and fought with his brother. Ferrex was killed in the battle between them and so too was all the force which had come over with him. Their mother, whose name was Judon, was greatly distressed when she heard of her son's death. She was consumed with hatred for Porrex, for she had loved Ferrex more than him. Judon became so unbalanced by anguish which the death of Ferrex had caused her that she made up her mind to avenge the death upon his brother Porrex. She chose a time when Porrex was asleep, set upon him with her maid-servants and hacked him to pieces.
As a result of this the people of Britain were for a long time embroiled in a civil war; and the island came into the hands of five kings who kept attacking and massacring each other's men in turn."
In the book: 'The Plantagenet Ancestry' by Lt.-Col. W.H. Turton, D.O.S. it shows on page 188 the descendency of the rulers of Brittany France and the Counts of Cornouailles. Judon, presumably a male, is the son of "Urbon (Congar), C. de Cornouaille." The son of Judon is Constantin C. de Cornouaille who married Barilie. They appear to have had two sons, Argant, Prince of Brittany and the second son was Justin. The successor of Justin was Alfrond, whose successor was Ulfret C. de Cornouaille, whose successor was Diles C. de Cornouaille who married Alava the great granddaughter of Prince Argent. Their successor was Budic I, Count de Cornouaille whose younger son was Periou. The son of Periou was Guegon de Perieur.
To those interested in the Grail Legend; the line of the Grail blood was said to be descended from Saint James The Just, the brother of Jesus. Thus the line of the Grail is Hebrew and or Jewish. One should note 'Judon' is the old High German word for Jew. It was used in a time when the use of Biblical names was not yet in vague. The Isle of Avalon has been said by many and suspected by more to be the peninsula of Brittany, France. w.voy.com forward slash four zero five six zero forward slash. Some have also suspected it to be the Isle of Sein which is near Carnac just off the coast of Brittany.
It should be remembered that Geoffrey was writing a story of a history of Britain that they wished was true. It was a piece of political propaganda as much as anything. It was designed to find the Normans, and in particularly Henry II who was king of England at the time, blameless of any wrongdoing and nothing less than selfless saviors of England. The truth was he, Henry, launched a war and won the throne by force. Henry's mother Empress Matilda was to be Queen regant of England. But her cousin Stephen usurped her claim. To my knowledge his book was the first modern mention of Utherpendragon and Arthur. The story during Henry II's time became so popular Henry made a great show of supposedly "finding" the grave of King Arthur. The fourth son of Henry II, Geoffrey II (1158-1186) was duly married off to Constance of Penthievre (Pendragon) the only child of Conan IV, Duke of Brittany and Earl of Richmond. Their only son was Prince Arthur, who was murdered by his uncle King John of England, after the death of his father, Geoffrey II. Thus this English side of the supposed Royal family secured the throne of England for themselves and their descendents once again. For a further exploration of this I suggest reading 'Eleanor of Aquitaine and the Four Kings' by Amy Kelly. As Mr. Peter Harradine of The International Commission on Nobility and Royalty put it "For example 80% of all European stock are descended from royalty, yet they 99.9% are all commoners." So who decides who is royalty and who is not? Apparently it's a good ol' boys club. They are only royalty because they have all gotten into agreement with each that they will "recognize" each other as being royal. One cannot be a king if one is illegitimate. This was the ruling of William the Conquer. Yet before he was William the Conquer he was William the Bastard. He created this law in England after he had fought his way to the throne. This rule should have excluded James I, the illegitimate son of Mary Queen of Scots and Rizzio thus making the entire "Royal Family" illegitimate, and should exclude Prince Harry of Wales, son of Lady Diana and Major James Hewitt. Just another example of those in power doing whatever they damn well please.
End post 276 A: www.voy.com/40560/, teltalheart=Michael D. Barnes
[
Next Thread |
Previous Thread |
Next Message |
Previous Message
]
|
Feedback: 
Post 276 A: Perer, Ferrer / Norman or old Breton