VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1234 ]
Subject: Post 296 A: Correction of Post 295 A: Dec. 31, 2011


Author:
teltalheart/moderator
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 22:11:33 12/31/11 Sat
Author Host/IP: 173-242-230-121.scottsboro.org/173.242.230.121

Post 296 A: Correction of Post 295 A: Dec. 31, 2011

I wish to correct a spelling error I made in Post 295 A:.
Under reference number (2) I made a misspelling of the title of that Reference Book. I wrote "Plantagent Ancestry". It should have been "Plantagenet Ancestry" by Douglas Richardson. I also left off the '(son)' appellation in front of "Coel I" as indicating him, Coel I, as the son of Penardun and Marius.

Due to the nature of human being, or should I say the propensity for illicit relationships of human beings, it is impossible to prove with 100% certainty before the advent of DNA a true family bloodine. No matter how "Royal" that bloodline may be. One thing about it. A man, before the advent of DNA, could never be sure a child by his wife or mistress was his. A woman always knows a child is hers. Thus the reason the 'Royal' bloodlines of the early Egyptians, Celts, and Hebrews, just to name a few, was held in the female line.

There will always be naysayers to any genealogy, no matter how well researched it might be. I have seen well respected genealogists write books and make obvious mistakes. As time goes on genealogy usually gets better with the advent of more information. But not always. In some cases older records may be more accurate. In some cases the researcher may have known something he or she failed to write down for posterity.

My genealogy on this particular line stands as is. Unless I see something that proves otherwise to me. It is what it is. I will say this; it is at least as accurate, if not more so, than that of Henry Charles Albert David Windsor, Prince of Wales, a.k.a. Prince Harry.

At any rate the chart references on Post 295 A: should have been thus:


(1) Bloodline of the Holy Grail, by Sir Laurence Gardner; (C) Element Books Limited 1996, & Text (C) Chevalier Labhran 1996.
(2) Plantagenet Ancestry, by Douglas Richardson; (C) Genealogical Publishing Co., Inc. 2004.
(3) Southern Kith and Kin, by Jewell Davis Scarborough (C) 1957.
(4) http://www.werelate.org/wiki/Person:Henry_Dugger_%2810%29, and www.werelate.org/wiki/Person:Daniel_Dugger_%281%29...etc.
(5) Genealogical records of Michael D. Barnes, a.k.a. teltalheart on www.voy.com/40560/

And, HAPPY NEW YEAR, EVERYONE, 2012!

End Post 296 A: www.voy.com/40560/ teltalheart=Michael D. Barnes

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]



Forum timezone: GMT-6
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.