VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 12345[6]78910 ]
Subject: Re: many buddhism research already point out that 楞嚴經是假的. Indeed, based on the buddhism research information, many China buddhism book is not pass from "Buddha", properly is the monk compose by themselves. However, Not REAl, does not mean that China buddhism book not point out the "utilmae truth". Some point out the truth, but some are not. Therefore, must be careful .


Author:
Tong Tong
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 20:53:51 12/29/03 Mon
In reply to: almond 's message, "珍惜" on 13:27:49 12/29/03 Mon


[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
[> [> Subject: 近代大德虛雲老和尚說:「現在是末法時代,你到那裡訪善知識呢?不如熟讀一部《楞嚴經》,修行就有把握,就能保綏哀救,消息邪緣,令其身心,入佛知見,從此成就,不遭歧路!」明朝袾宏大師則說:「縱使他人能說此經,吾亦尊之為佛祖也。相反,縱使佛現於前而說《楞嚴經》是偽經者,吾等亦視為魔說可矣!」但很巧合,楞嚴經是佛教中破魔障邪見的要經,但又剛好遇上被指為假經,實在有點無奈,梵文學家果斌居士的考證,就認為楞嚴經不是假的。但無論如何,當中的道理若不是邪說,都值得參考的。


Author:
almond
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 08:36:27 12/30/03 Tue


[ Post a Reply to This Message ]
[> [> Subject: Re: many buddhism research already point out that 楞嚴經是假的. Indeed, based on the buddhism research information, many China buddhism book is not pass from "Buddha", properly is the monk compose by themselves. However, Not REAl, does not mean that China buddhism book not point out the "utilmae truth". Some point out the truth, but some are not. Therefore, must be careful .


Author:
林麗文
[ Edit | View ]

Date Posted: 05:37:46 03/15/04 Mon

楞嚴經 has some mistakes but not all. Nobody can find the original one. However, it is very essencially that 楞嚴經 is to say Buddhisattava Maitreya's practice not Kuan Yin.
This is very important. Maitreya's main stream teaching is on "Love is suffering, impermence and noself". For all Maitreya's disciples, it is very important to study 楞嚴經 and listen to sermon of 楞嚴經.

[ Post a Reply to This Message ]


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT+7
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.