Re: photograghers -- The Help Board

[ Show ]

Support VoyForums

[ Shrink ]

VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

[ Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 1, [2] ]

Subject: Re: photograghers

Author:
No name

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Date Posted: 12:08:24 08/05/01 Sun
In reply to: iluvpageants 's message, "photograghers" on 11:38:11 07/26/01 Thu

Personally, I would have them retouched. Even if you don't like digital, 9 out of 10 times a digital photo will be beat an unretouched photo. It's sad that it's that way but a digital just looks better because it's a "perfect" photo.

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:

[> [> Subject: Re: photograghers
Author: No name [ Edit \| View ]	Date Posted: 16:38:59 08/05/01 Sun Alot of what people think is digital is actually hand retouched on the negative and not actually digital at all. It looks more natural than the digital.