VoyForums
[ Show ]
Support VoyForums
[ Shrink ]
VoyForums Announcement: Programming and providing support for this service has been a labor of love since 1997. We are one of the few services online who values our users' privacy, and have never sold your information. We have even fought hard to defend your privacy in legal cases; however, we've done it with almost no financial support -- paying out of pocket to continue providing the service. Due to the issues imposed on us by advertisers, we also stopped hosting most ads on the forums many years ago. We hope you appreciate our efforts.

Show your support by donating any amount. (Note: We are still technically a for-profit company, so your contribution is not tax-deductible.) PayPal Acct: Feedback:

Donate to VoyForums (PayPal):

Login ] [ Contact Forum Admin ] [ Main index ] [ Post a new message ] [ Search | Check update time | Archives: 123[4]56 ]
Subject: Re: 為什麼要擺脫意義呢?


Author:
試答
[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]
Date Posted: 10:20:15 07/14/01 Sat
In reply to: 背後有沒有什麼理念呢? 's message, "為什麼要擺脫意義呢?" on 09:49:46 07/14/01 Sat

我忘記了夏宇有沒有提過她的本意, 但我猜她的動機是要証明文字的獨立存在的可能, 就如顏色。但文字的存在可能是為意義而生, 因為沒有表達或紀錄的動機, 人就不會創造文字, 所以"磨擦無以名狀"最終做不到將文字比擬為顏色, 只成了色塊、意符.

>>夏宇《摩擦.無以名狀》是一個很好的「拼湊範例」。夏宇曾
>>g希望文字能夠擺脫意義而終於不可能。

[ Next Thread | Previous Thread | Next Message | Previous Message ]

Replies:
Subject Author Date
絕對同意11:14:08 07/14/01 Sat
Re: 為什麼要擺脫意義呢?你說得相當好嘛00:44:59 07/18/01 Wed
  • 是嗎 -- 然而飛不飛, 20:16:10 07/18/01 Wed
    • 那會不會是 -- 比較貼近於對作者意願的幾種不協調的猜測呢, 09:32:39 07/19/01 Thu


Post a message:
This forum requires an account to post.
[ Create Account ]
[ Login ]
[ Contact Forum Admin ]


Forum timezone: GMT-8
VF Version: 3.00b, ConfDB:
Before posting please read our privacy policy.
VoyForums(tm) is a Free Service from Voyager Info-Systems.
Copyright © 1998-2019 Voyager Info-Systems. All Rights Reserved.